Agency & Partnerships Flashcards
What is agency (definition)
Fiduciary relationship which results from the manifestation of consent by one person to another that the other shall act on his behalf and subject to his control, and consent by the other person so to act
What degree of control is needed for agency?
Degree need not be significant
Sufficient if principal specifies tasks agent should perform
What is the equal dignities rule?
Agency agreements must be in writing when agent is to enter into certain contracts within SOF or agency agreement itself would fall within SOF
For valid agency relationship to exist, check for the following:
Capacity
Consent
Writing if required
What fiduciary duties does an agent owe to the principal?
Duty of care = carry out agency w rsble care
Duty of loyalty = owe undivided loyalty to principal
Duty of obedience = must obey all rsble directions of their principal
What duties does a principal owe to an agent (these are not fiduciary duties)?
Compensation
Cooperation
Indemnity/reimbursement
Express contractual duties
What remedies does an agent have for principal’s breach of duties?
Contractual remedies
Possessory lien
What remedies does a principal have against an agent for breach of duty?
Contract remedies
Tort remedies
Constructive trust
Action for secret profits
Withhold compensation
Terminate agency
What is actual authority?
Actual authority = based on principal’s dealings with the agent
Express = conveyed by principal in words, based on the agency agreement
Implied = agent rsbly believes exists as a result of principal’s words or actions
What are some things implied authority can be based on?
Incidental to express authority
arising out of custom known to the agent
resulting from prior acquiescence by the principal
to take emergency measures
to delegate authority where it’s necessary or customary
to pay for and accept delivery of goods
to give general warranties
to manage investments
After determining that there was actual (express or implied) authority, need to first determine whether it was actually terminated before saying they had the go ahead. What are some grounds for termination?
the happening of an event specified in a contract that terminates authority
lapse of a rsble time if termination isn’t specified in contract
a change in circumstances, including destruction of subject matter, insolvency, change in business conditions, etc
agent’s breach of fiduciary duty
either party’s unilateral termination
operation of law (for ex, by changes of law, by person’s death if the agent knows about it, by change in mental capacity)
When is agency irrevocable?
When it’s an agency coupled with an interest or a power given as security - can’t be revoked if agency was given to protect the agent’s rights and it is supported by consideration
What is apparent authority?
Based on third party’s rsble belief
When principal holds out another as possessing authority and based on this holding out, a third party is rsbly led to believe that authority exists
If the principal’s words or conduct would lead a rsble person in the third party’s position to believe that the agent has authority to act on the principal’s behalf, the agent has apparent authority to bind the principal
What is ratification?
After-the-fact authority
Express: oral or written affirmation
Implied: principal accepts benefits
For ratification to occur, the principal must:
(1) have knowledge of, or reason to know, all material facts regarding the contract
(2) accept the entire transaction and
(3) have capacity
Be aware of some third party thing intervening and cutting off ratification ability
who is bound on a contract between agents, principals, and third parties?
Generally, if agent had actual or apparent authority to enter a contract for the principal, or if the principal ratified a previously unauthorized contract, the agent can’t be held personally responsible
If parties to the contract intended for the agent to be liable, the agent can be found liable even though he normally wouldn’t be
And if agent didn’t actually have authority to enter into contract, agent can be held liable for damages for breaching an implied warranty that a principal w contractual capacity exists and they they, the agent, had authority to contract for the principal
BUT if the principal is UNIDENTIFIED or UNDISCLOSED, either the principal or the agent can be held liable
but remember: whether the principal was disclosed, unidentified, or undisclosed only matters when considering agent liability - any type of principal will be bound as long as the agent had authority so you don’t need to discuss then
when may third parties be liable to the principal and agent?
Principal = disclosed = only the principal, not the agent, may enforce the contract and hold third party liable
Principal = unidentified or undisclosed = either principal or agent may enforce contract and hold party liable
Principal can’t enforce contract if there’s been an affirmative fraudulent misrepresentation of the principal’s identity or if there is an unforeseen increased burden to the third party due to the fact that performance is due to the other principal and not the agent
What is vicarious liability?
employer liable for torts in scope of employee’s employment
Not liable for independent contractor’s actions generally
Except if the activity involved was inherently dangerous, the duty was nondelegable, or the principal knowingly selected an incompetent IC - then employer can be held vicariously liable for IC’s actions
How do you determine if someone is an employee or an independent contractor?
Principal/employer retains the right to control the manner in which an employee performs their works
Principal does not reserve/have a right to control the manner in which work is performed by an IC
If principal has right to tell agent how to achieve the results he desires, the agent is an employee
What are some factors to consider when determining if principal has high two control the method and manner of work:
Degree of skill required (greater the skill, greater the likelihood of IC)
Tools and facilities used
Period of employment
Basis of compensation
Business purpose
Distinct business
characterization and understanding of parties
customs of the locality regarding work supervision
What three factors are helpful to assess if the employer’s tort was committed within the scope of employment?
Was the conduct “of the kind” that the agent was hired to do?
Did the tort occur “on the job”? (detour = minor deviation from employer’s directions, liable; frolic = substantial deviation from employer’s directions, not liable)
Was the conduct actuated/motivated at least in part to benefit the principal?