Agency and Partnership Flashcards
Three Agency Problems
- Liability of Principal to Third Parties for Torts of an Agent.
- Liability of Principal to Third Parties for Contracts Entered into by an Agent.
- Duties which Agents Owe to Principals.
Liability for Principal for Torts of Agent - Respondeat Superior or Vicarious Liability
Issue: Whether the principal will be vicariously liable for torts committed by its agent.
Two Part Test for Principal Liability to Torts
- There is a Principal Agent Relationship;
AND - The Tort must be commited by the agent within the scope of the relationship.
Principal-Agent Relationship Requirements
- Assent
- Benefit
- Control
Assent
An informal agreement between the Principal, who has capacity, and the Agent
Benefit
The Agent’s conduct must be for the Principal’s benefit.
Control
The Principal must have the right to control the Agent by having the power to supervise the manner of the Agent’s performance
Sub-Agents: Will the principal be vicariously liable if its agent gets the help of a “sub-agent” and they commit a tort?
Only if there is: 1. Assent 2. Benefit 3. Control Between Principal and Sub-Agent tortfeasor
**Without all three, NO VICARIOUS LIABILITY
Borrowed Agents: Will the principal who borrows another principal’s agent be vicariously liable the “borrowed agent” tort?
Only if there is: 1. Assent 2. Benefit 3. Control Between Borrowing Principal and Borrowed Agent tortfeasor
**Without all three, NO VICARIOUS LIABILITY
The key distinction between an Agent and an Independent Contractor
There is NO RIGHT TO CONTROL an Independent Contractor because there is NO POWER to supervise the manner of its performance or work.
Vicarious Liability Rule for Independent Contractor Torts
As a rule, there can be no vicarious liability for an Independent Contractor’s torts.
Exceptions to NO Vicarious Liability for Independent Contractors
- Inherently dangerous activities - if youR IC commits a tort in an inherently dangerous activity, Vicariously Liable. (Non-Delegable Duty)
AND - Estoppel - if you hold out your IC with the appearance of Agency you will be estopped from denying liability.
Scope of Principal-Agent Relationship Test
- Was conduct “of the kind” agent was hired to perform?
- Did the tort orccur “on the job”? Frolic v. Detour
- Did the agent intend to benefit the Principal?
Was conduct “of the kind” agent was hired?
Was the conduct within the job description, if so likely inside the scope.
Did the tort occur “on the job”? **Tested often
A frolic is a new and independent journey and is outside the scope.
A detour is a mere departure from an assigned task and is inside the scope.
Did the agent intent to benefit the Principal?
If the Agent, even in part, intended to benefit the Principal by its conduct that is enough to be inside the scope.
Vicarious Liability of the Principal for Intentional Torts Committed by the Agent
Intentional torts are generally outside the scope.
Exceptions to Vicarious Liability of the Principal for Intentional Torts Committed by the Agent
- If conduct was authorized by the Principal
OR - If conduct was natural from the nature of employment
OR - If conduct was motivated by a desire to serve principal
What to look for in within the scope?
Detour if you are driving back to work.
Liability of Principal for Contracts Entered by Agents Issue
Whether the principal is liable for contracts entered into by its agent?
Test for Liability of Principal for Contracts Entered by Agents Issue
Principal is liable for contracts entered into by its agent only if the principal authorized the agent to enter the contract.
Four Types of Authority
- Actual Express
- Actual Implied
- Apparent
- Ratification
Actual Expressed Authority
Principal used words to express authority to agent.
Actual express authority can be
1. Oral
AND
2. Private
Narrowly Interpreted - confined to words used in it.
Exceptions to Oral and Private Actual Expressed Authority
If the contract itself must be in writing, then the express authority must be in writing.
**Land Sales (Look up Statute of Fraud)