Agency Flashcards
Definition of Agency
Agency is a fiduciary relationship, where a person or entity (the agent) acts on behalf of another (the principal).
Elements – An agency relationship exists if there is:
1) Assent – a formal or informal agreement;
2) Benefit – the conduct primarily benefits the principal; AND
3) Control – the principal has the right to control the agent (control doesn’t need to be significant).
Types of Agency Relationships
− Universal Agent – has broad authority,
authorized for ALL acts the principal can perform.
− General Agent – has authority to conduct a series of transactions over a period of time.
− Special Agent – has limited authority either for a specific act/transaction OR a specified period of time.
Termination of Agency Relationship
An agency relationship terminates by:
a) A manifestation by either party that the relationship is terminated;
b) Expiration of a specified term of authority;
c) Death of principal or agent (by operation of law); OR
d) Incapacity of the principal or agent (by operation of law) – except if a durable power of attorney exists.
Actual Authority
A principal is bound to a contract entered into by its agent if the agent had actual authority.
2 types of actual authority
Express Authority→by principal’s explicit directions to the agent (either orally or in writing).
Implied Authority→either:
a) Action is necessary to carry out the agent’s express authorized duties;
b) Agent acted similarly in prior dealings with the principal; OR
c) It’s customary for an agent in that position (silence/acquiescence can give rise to a reasonable belief of authority in the future).
Apparent Authority
A principal is bound to a contract entered into by its agent if the agent had apparent authority.
Apparent Authority exists when:
1) A third-party reasonably believes the agent has authority to act on behalf of the principal; AND
2) That belief is traceable from the principal’s manifestations (principal holds the agent out as having authority).
A principal holds the agent out as having authority when he:
a) gives a position or title indicating authority;
b) previously held the agent out and did not published a revocation; OR
c) cloaked the agent with the appearance of authority.
*Continues until the principal communicates termination to third-parties.
Apparent Authority is NOT applicable if:
a) the third-party had knowledge that the agent did not have actual authority;
b) the transaction was not within the ordinary usages of business; or
c) there is an undisclosed principal.
Ratification
Makes the principal liable for an agent’s contract entered into without authority.
Ratification occurs when the Principal:
1) Has knowledge of all material facts or contract terms; AND
2) Assents (approves) to the same through words or conduct.
*Agent also remains liable if principal was not disclosed.
Agent’s Contractual Liability
Generally, an agent has NO liability if they:
1. Fully disclose the principal to a third-party; AND
2. Have actual or apparent authority.
Employee vs. Independent Contractor
Primary focus is whether the principal had the right to control the manner and method in which the job was performed.
Factors→courts analyze the following to determine if a person is an employee or independent contractor:
1) type of work;
2) pay (hourly vs. per project);
3) who supplied the equipment/tools;
4) degree of supervision;
5) degree of skill required;
6) if the work benefits the employer’s business;
7) extent of principal’s control over work details;
8) whether agent/contractor is engaged in a distinct business;
9) length of time employed/engaged;
10) characterization & belief of relationship; and
11) whether agent was hired for a business purpose.
Respondeat Superior Doctrine
An employer is liable for an employee’s negligent acts if the employee was acting within the scope of the employment.
Employee acts within Scope of Employment when:
a) Performing work assigned by the employer; OR
b) Engaging in a course of conduct subject to the employer’s control.
Time, Place, & Purpose Test
To determine the scope of employment, courts analyze whether the conduct:
i) Is of the kind the employee is employed to perform;
ii) Occurs substantially within the authorized time and space limits; and
iii) Is motivated (in whole or part) to serve the employer.