After Virtue Flashcards

1
Q

Chapter 1 synopsis

A

Imagines a world where society rejects science and destroys scientific knowledge, then regrets its decision and attempts to bring science back

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Consequences of chapter 1

A

Since only parts of science remain, people start practicing it without really understanding it or how to use it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Conclusion of chapter 1

A

The way we use the language of morality in the real world is the same chaotic state as science is in his imaginary world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why cant his chapter 1 hypothesis be accepted?

A

A lack of evidence either way

We inherently do not recognise the current state that we are in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MacIntyre on modern practices

A

They think they can see the chaos of the way we use oral language but actually cannot, since they are born from it and do not have the faculties to look past it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MacIntyre on history

A

Vital to understanding philosophy

Since academic history has only been a thing for 2 centuries it still has the issue of perspective from more language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Chapter 7 synopsis

A

Since we are understanding virtue as obeying certain rules, we must come up with some rules
We cannot achieve this in modern individualist culture
This has extreme consequences for justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why modern individualist culture is an issue

A

It provides no framework for deciding between, e.g. the left and right wings of politics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Academics MacIntyre uses

A

Robert Nozick

John Rawls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why does he use these academics?

A

To demonstrate that, due to the discord in moral language and philosophy’s too systematic and scientific approach, there is no framework for decision.
E.g. abortion in U.S.: both sides of view’s conclusions follow from their premises, but the starting premises are incompatible. There is also no real hope for finding a consensus on the matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Macintyre on rational agent

A

The one in the contentious situation who would make the decision.
We are not behind a veil of ignorance
Appealing to that premise begs the question: why choose A over B?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly