Affirmative Defenses to Intentional Torts Flashcards
Consent
what are the 3 types
- Actual consent
- Apparent consent
- Presumed consent
Actual Consent rule
scope of consent
o A person’s actual consent extends to conduct of the actor that is not substantially different in nature from the conduct that the person is willing to permit.
Actual consent
dealing with sports
certain types of conduct is expected, and then there’s other conduct that isn’t expected
Reasonable conduct within a game
* Ask whether the conduct part of the game?–> if so its within the scope of consent
Actual Consent
Consent requires the capacity to do so…but…
o Incapacity might be due to a plaintiff’s youth, intellectual disability, or mental illness, or it might be due to a temporary condition such as inebriation.
The standard in is generally whether the “person is capable of appreciating the nature, extent, and potential consequences of the conduct consented to.
Actual consent
dealing with inferred actual consent rule
Presumed Consent rule
You must ask yourself “would a reasonable person in the defendant’s position believe that the plaintiff consented to D’s conduct?”
o Ex. using this in a fact pattern where P is silent
Presumsed Consent
Emergency Doctrine EXCEPTION
o It’s the policy of doctor being there immediately or P’s life is in jeopardy
o 1. P is unconscious
o 2. There is an emergency of life or death where immediate action is necessary
o 3. AND physician has no reason to believe that had this person been conscious, they would have objected
Presumed Consent
Religious Exception to Emergency Doctrine Exception
Religious objections can cease the emergency doctrine by the P himself or by parents over the child
Presumed Consent
Doctor overruling Exception to Emergency Doctrine Exception
- If the doctor can overrule a parent’s denial of life-or-death emergency to operation of a minor child–> the doctor needs an immediate court order
Presumed Consent
Accidental conduct on P by Physician
o Even if the conduct is beneficial to P–>battery is still committed bc there was no consent
Presumed Consent
conditions paced
o Anyone may put conditions on consent
o AND every adult of sound mind has the right to determine what shall be done with her body
Presumed consent
more on conditions placed dealing with refusing treatment
o A competent, informed adult may refuse medical treatment that is necessary to preserve life as long as right to refuse treatment is not limited to those who are suffering from terminal condition
Self Defense (SD)
general rules for SD
Generally, you must meet initial aggressor’s force
* Your force must be proportionate to the aggressor’s force
Generally, you can use deadly force when you reasonably believe you are threatened with deadly force
* You can make a mistake as long you reasonably believed you were threatened with deadly force
Non deadly force
* There is never a duty to retreat
SD
Deadly Force majority approach: Stand your Ground
- You can stand your ground in a place you have the right to be in
- AND you can use deadly force when met with deadly force
SD
Deadly Force minority approach: Castle Doctrine
You must retreat rather than using deadly force even if you can do so safely unless you are in your own home
* If you are in your own home–> you do not have to retreat, and you can use proportional force
o The law presumes that if you are threatened with deadly force by aggressor–> you can use deadly force
* This doctrine typically comes into play is when ppl break and enter into a home at night