Advice PT1 Flashcards
Decision making has been studies by many research over the years, however
The social context and social process is typically ignored which are key factors of decision making.
For example group decision making where there leaders and some sort of established hierarchy.
Advice provides
Cross, Borgatti & Park 2001
Solution Meta Knowledge Problem reformulation Validity Legitimisation
There is a difference between information and advice which is
That information is descriptive whilst advice is evaluative
Reasons to take advice
Accept help Share responsibility and resource Increase knowledge Be more accurate Get emotion support
There is a social pressure to not reject advice
People seek advice of others before making decision
Harvey & Fischer 1997
Yanis 2004
When they are in complex situation in which they have little to no experience ( Harvey and Fischer, 1997) and little knowledge (Yanis, 2004)
Asking for advice is dependant on many factors one being the mental
Effort and task demands.
Low effort demands tend to be simple, unimportant and low risk.
Whilst high effort demands are risky, important and complex.
Decision making has been studies under
Judge Advisor System
Hierarchical Team Decision Making
Participative Decision making
The judge Advisor System developed by Sniezek & Buckley (1995) is
A paradigm in which the judge obtains information to share and recommend an Advisor.
There are two roles in the Judge Advisor system which are the
Advisor and Judge.
The Advisor is the individual that provides information to the Judge, whist the Judge is the optimal decision maker.
The Judge Advisor System differs from Hollenbeck et al (1995)
Hierarchical Decision Making Team Model, since it gives one person the power to decide
The hierarchical team decision making by Hollenbeck et al (1995) is
Look it up
The participative decision making is a paradigm
That encourages employees to share and participate in organisational decision making.
According to Bonaccio & Dalal (2010)
There are four types of advices
Recommendation for
Recommendation on what the jugde ought to do
Recommendation Against
Recommendation against on what the judge ought not to do
