adverse possession Flashcards
continuous
exercise or control over property during the statutory period in a way that is customary for that type of property
* Privity of this is necessary for tacking
hostile or adverse
use is nonpermissive
* Use is adverse or hostile to the true owner’s rights
actual
must physically occupy the property in some manner
* Possessor must treat the land as an “average owner”
notorious/open (visible)
acts must be sufficiently visible to put a reasonable owner on notice that the property is being occupies by a non-owner
claim of right or color of title
either claim it by actual possession or defective title
exclusive
type that would be expected by a true owner
* Exclusion of the true owner by the non-owner
statutory period
adverse possession relies on a ()
tacking privity rule
() allows parties claiming adverse possession to use their predecessors’ conduct on the property to meet the time requirements of adverse possession
- Must be connected by privity of title or claim
*The original adverse possessor purported to transfer title/claim of property to the successor
brown v gobble holding
created CHANCES
claim of right
() → made by someone who cannot allege that the title had ever come into their possession in the past
*He has dispossessed the true owner by virtue of civil trespass
color of title
() results when a written instrument that purports to transfer title to real property either has no effect because the grantor doesn’t own the property or there is some defect in the title
paine v sexton holding
Land claimed through adverse possession may be maintained in a predominantly natural state if sufficient notice of occupation exists
nome 2000 v fagerstrom holding
The actions required for adverse possession depend on the character of the land in question, and the requirements will be met if the land is used for the statutory period as an average owner of similar property would use it
hoffman v bob law holding
A property owner does not have an absolute right to an injunction ordering the removal of an encroachment
doctrine of relative hardship
A balancing test where an equity court considers a number of factors to determine the potential harms to the parties with and without injunctive relief