Advanced Quantum Mechanics Flashcards

1
Q

What is a condition on the potential of a hamiltonian for it to be translationally invariant?

What about for a system of two particles?

A

The potential must be constant in r (otherwise the hamiltonian would not be translationally invariant).
-> i.e: there can be no external forces for translational invariance

However, for a system of two (or more) particles, the potential can be a function of the difference of particle locations, so invariant to spatial translation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is the hamiltonian by definition invariant to time-translation?

A

The hamiltonian is evaluated for an instant in time, and is not dependent on the past or the future.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is meant by galilean invariance?

A

The combination of space/time translation and rotational symmetry groups. (all space-time continuous symmetries)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the significance of two operators that commute?

A

They can be simultaneously diagonalised, i.e: the operators SHARE EIGENSTATES.
-> a state can be an eigenstate of both operators simultaneously, so the result of both “measurements” can be known simultaneously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the effect of parity and time reversal transforms on momentum?

A

Both result in p -> -p (but for different reasons)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the form of the lorenz boost operator?

A

4x4 matrix acting on space-time 4-vector.

y, y, 1, 1 on the leading diagonal
-y beta, -y beta on the top left anti-diagonal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Given transformation operator T, what is the form of the transformation of operator A?
What is a condition for the invariance of operator A under the transformation?

A

wavefunction –> T wavefunction
! A –> T A T^-1 !
This can be shown by considering the action of A on a wavefunction, and then transforming this.
SHOW (check notes)

For invariance: A = T A T^-1 = T^-1 A T
(the last bit can be shown by considering a matrix element involving A)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the difference between a “passive” and “active” transformation?

A

Passive is the action of an operator on a wavefunction to transform it.
Active is changing the coordinate system of a wavefunction to transform it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How can we find symmetry generators for continuous symmetries?

A

Consider the active transformation, making the transformation parameter arbitrarily small (as it is continuous) and making a taylor expansion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the generator for spatial translation?

Show this derivation.

A

Momentum operator is the generator for spatial translation. (this makes sense: if we add momentum to a system we expect it to translate as time increases)
Check notes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can we show that for a hamiltonian to be invariant to some transformation, it must commute with the generator of the symmetry?

A

Set that the matrix element[acting on transformed wavefunctions] = matrix element[acting on untransformed wavefunctions]

Then make the expansion to first order with the symmetry generator (multiplied by small parameter).
Then set that the terms in the small parameter must sum to 0 (not including the term in the small parameter squared). This will take the form of a commutator being equal to 0.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the generator for time translation?

A

The hamiltonian is the generator for time translation.

Thus the hamiltonian must be time-translation invariant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the form of the hamiltonian operator?

A

momentum operator^2 / 2m + potential.

also i hbar d/dt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the form of the momentum operator?

A

-i hbar d/dx

or del in multiple dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the generator of rotations?

How can we derive this?

A

Angular momentum operator (in the direction of the rotation axis).

Consider a small angle rotation (around some axis), and it’s action on the x, y and z coordinates. This action can be expressed as a matrix, take the taylor expansion (first order).
^ this expresses the effect on the coordinate axes, to show the effect on a wavefunction, expand the transformed wavefunction to first order also.

This will result in something that can be identified as a cross product, and then put into the form of an:
angular momentum operator (in the axis of the rotation).
(Check Notes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What kind of transformations do not have generators?

A

Discrete symmetries to not have generators.

The discrete symmetry operators are defined by their action on the wavefunction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the possible eigenvalues of the parity and time-reversal operators?
What is special about the eigenstates of the time-reversal operator?

A

Eigenvalue +-1 (as the operators squared give the identity)

Time-reversal eigenstates are either purely real or imaginary. (this can be shown by considering the hamiltonian (energy) acting on:

  • the normal state (but then take the conjugate of this equation)
  • the transformed state

we can then show that for time-reversal eigenstates, the conjugate state is equal to +- the state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How can we find the generator for lorenz boosts?

A

Consider the lorenz boost operator (4x4 matrix) with small delta beta => so y ~= 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the properties of unitary operators? (ADD TO THIS)

Which symmetry operators are unitary, how can we show this?

A

Unitary operators preserve the inner product (i.e: the inner product of two states acted on by the operator is equal to the inner product of the un-operated states).

thus the hermitian conjugate of a unitary operator is equal to its inverse.

Symmetry transformations that keep the volume element of space invariant are unitary.
This can be shown by considering the inner product of two (actively) transformed wavefunctions, and changing variables to the transformed basis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is an expression for e^x, very useful for finding finite transformation operators?

A

e^x = lim{N -> inf} [1 + x/N]^N

this can be shown by taking the taylor expansion of either side.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How can we derive finite tranformation operators from infinitesimal transformations?

A

Consider the finite transformation as an infinite series of infinitesimal transformations. (i.e: lim{N->inf} of the finite transformation parameter/N).

This can be expressed as an exponential.

The result is just e^(the infinitesimal transformation, with the finite transformation parameter instead of the infinitesimal one)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Derive the form of the finite time translation operator.

A

Check notes.

e^(-i/hbar t H)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is the commutation rule for angular momentum operators L_i and L_j ?

A

i hbar levi-cevita{ijk} L_k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Why must we use euler angles to perform a general finite rotational transformation?

A

We cannot apply the three angle transformations one after the other as the three angular momentum operators do not commute.

If we work in the mindset of performing three rotations one by one from the outset, we do not have this problem. However, we must now consider that the coordinate axes will change after each transformation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are the three elementary euler angle transformations?

How can we express the three transformations using operators in the original basis?

A

Rotate by ALPHA about Z^
Rotate by BETA about X’^
Rotate by GAMMA about Z’^

The second two transformations will involve angular momentum operators in the new bases, which is not ideal:
Check notes.

              Rotate by GAMMA about Z^
              Rotate by BETA about X^
              Rotate by ALPHA about Z^
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is a Wigner D matrix?

How can we construct it?

A

A Wigner D matrix is the matrix formed of the matrix elements of the euler finite angle operator in the l, m_l basis (use l, m_l in the L_z basis).
We can use this to perform a finite rotation on an eigenstate of L_z.

Note that the action of the rotations about Z^ are simply that of eigenvectors.
Also note that the rotation about X^ will not mix l and l’ states, only m_l and m_l’, so there will be a dirac delta ll’ dependence (not part of the Wigner D matrix).

Check notes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

When finding a Wigner D matrix, how can we find the X^ rotation operator in the L_z basis?

A

Make a taylor expansion of the exponential, then notice that the expansion can be simplified into an initial term and two trig terms ( x matrices).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is the commutator [r, p]?

A

= i hbar

for r and p being parallel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

How can a cross product be expressed in einstein summation notation?

A

c = a x b

c_k = levi cevita {ijk} a_i b_j

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

How can we represent spin-1/2 matrices in terms of pauli matrices?

A

S = ( hbar / 2 ) pauli matrices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is the expression for general pauli matrix multiplication?

A

pauli_i pauli_j = delta{ij} I + i levi-cevita{ijk} pauli_k

i.e: pauli^2 = I
pauli[i] pauli[j] = -pauli[j] pauli[i]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is the result of ( pauli dot momentum operator )^2 ?

What about (pauli dot O)^2 where O is a general operator?

A

simply p^2 I
(as the condition p x p = 0 is satisfied)

(pauli dot O)^2
= O^2 + i pauli dot (O x O)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Do the pauli matrices commute with the position and momentum operators?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What can e^(i d [pauli_j]) be evaluated to?

A

cos(d) I + i [pauli_j] sin(d)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What is the general idea behind time-dependent perturbation theory?

A

We are considering the probability of a system being translated from one eigenstate to another by some time-dependent perturbing hamiltonian. (The TISE basis will be valid before and after and perturbation).

The state can be expanded in terms of time dependent coefficients for the eigenstates. An equation for these coefficients can be found and approximated using a perturbation series, that expands in powers of lambda around the perturbing hamiltonian (considered to have some small parameter lambda).

We truncate this series at first order.
The zeroth-order result for the coefficient is that it remains the same as before the perturbation.
We get an integral for the first-order term.

36
Q

What are the first and second terms in the perturbation series solution to the coefficient of eigenstate n, for a system that starts in eigenstate 1?

What is a requirement for perturbation theory to be valid?

A

First-order term:
d_n(0) = dirac delta (n 1)

Second-order term:
(CHECK NOTES)

**don’t forget that these coefficients will be complex and the probabilities of transition are related to these coefficients squared.

For this to be valid, the probability of transition to another state must be very small.

37
Q

What is the perturbing hamiltonian for a particle subject to an electric field E in the z-direction?

A

H_perturbing = - q E z

38
Q

What is the “fermi golden rule” result for a step-like potential?
What about an oscillatory potential?

A

Step-like potential (time-independent potential switched on at t=0):
P(transition) = ( 2 pi t / hbar^2 ) matrix_element^2 delta(omega[fi])

i.e: only non-zero when E_f = E_i

Oscillatory potential
Same result, but with delta(omega[fi] - omega)

where omega is the frequency of the oscillatory potential. (i.e: the difference between state energies is equal to the energy of the oscillatory potential)

39
Q

How can we derive the fermi golden rule result for an oscillatory potential?

A

Consider the potential to be V e^-(i omega t) where V is time-independent.

Consider the potential to be acting between -t/2 and t/2, and then take the limit as t -> inf at the end.

(in practice, of course this potential is never on permanently, this results in smearing of the potential frequency, so we will have the sinc^2 rather than the pure delta function)

40
Q

What do we see for the fermi golden rule result for a “real” oscillatory potential (e.g: cos(omega t) dependence)?

A

We will just get the sum of normal oscillatory fermi golden rule terms, one with
delta(omega[fi] - omega)
(absorption), and one with
delta(omega[fi] + omega)
(emission).

41
Q

What is the form of the dirac delta that is heavily used in the fermi golden rule derivation?

A

Check notes

lim{t -> inf} [ t sinc^2( xt / 2 ) ] / 2pi = delta(x)

42
Q

What potential should we use for EM radiation when considering the emission/absorption of radiation?

A

Neglect magnetic field as it is smaller by a factor of c.
Use the dipole approximation (valid for long wavelength).

V = q E dot r = -e cos(omega t) (E dot r)

where in the RHS E is the amplitude of the electric field.

43
Q

What is the selection rule for parity changes of atoms undergoing an electric dipole transition?

What about angular momentum changes?

What about spatial state?

A

The photon transition results in a parity change of -1. (the dipole operator is odd parity -> the matrix element must be even otherwise will integrate to zero)

The photon removes l = +-1, but this can project to -1, 0, +1.
However, there are NO Delta l = 0 transitions for single electron states, as the angular momentum is directly connected to the parity.

For multiple-electron atoms, we must have Delta S = 0.

We do not consider dipole transitions between states of the same n, as they have roughly equivalent energy.

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????

44
Q

What is the relation between the width of a state and its energy?
What about its lifetime?

A

Energy uncertainty approx equal to width. (energy FWHM)

Width = hbar / lifetime

45
Q

What is the relation of the consideration of energy width to first-order perturbation results?

A

Energy width is a result of second-order (and higher) perturbation theory, where amplitudes depend on couplings to ALL other states.

The energy width removes the dirac delta of the 1st-order perturbation fermi golden rule result. An exact energy matching is no longer required.

46
Q

How can we express the wavefunction of an unstable particle “stationary state”?

A

Normal stationary state
=> e^( -i omega t ) x spatial wavefunction

Unstable stationary state
=> e^( -i omega t - [t / 2tau]) x spatial wavefunction

in order to recover P(t) = e^(-t/tau) (survival probability).

47
Q

What is the perturbing potential given a force F acting along the x-direction?

A

V = - Fx

48
Q

What is the hamiltonian for a charged particle in an EM field?

A

1/(2m) ( p - qA )^2 + qPhi

49
Q

The momentum of a particle in a in the presence of EM (M) field is not conserved, what is conserved instead?

A

The canonical momentum PI = p - qA is conserved.

50
Q

What are the gauge symmetries of the EM field in terms of the gauge potential lambda?

A

Phi –> Phi - d/dt (lambda)

A –> A + del (lambda)

51
Q

What requirements do we place on the gauge transformation operator when deriving it?

What is the gauge transformation operator?

A

It must be unitary (as it preserves the spatial volume element). ===> so try exponential form
It can be time dependent but choose time independent for the derivation (works out as the same thing).
It must leave a general matrix element (observable) invariant. ===> use the matrix element with the hamiltonian

We get the form:

e^( i/hbar q lambda)

52
Q

Why can the usual operator transformation procedure not be applied to the hamiltonian with the gauge transformation operator?

A

The TDSE is not covariant, so the fact that the gauge transformation operator can be time-dependent does not allow it to transform the hamiltonian in the usual way.

53
Q

What is the effect of the gauge transformation operator on eigenvalues, eigenstates?

What is the effect of the gauge transformation operator on the momentum operator?

A

Eigenstates are transformed
Eigenvalues must not transform (requirement)

p - q del (lambda) [canonical momentum]

54
Q

What do the “landau levels” refer to?

What is the “landau gauge” that we use for this problem?

A

The problem of a electron free to move in the x-y plane, with a homogenous magnetic field in the z-direction.

The landau gauge refers to the choice of vector potential:
A = Bx yhat

55
Q

What method do we use to solve the TISE to find the landau levels?

A

Expand the EM field hamiltonian [make sure not to miss any terms (use a dummy wavefunction)!!].

We can then separate the wavefunctions into states in x and stationary states in y (as the hamiltonian commutes with p_y in this gauge).

This results in a shifted QHO in x, with the cyclotron frequency. Thus the energy levels are dependent on the x state only, and independent of k_y.

E = hbar x cyclotron frequency x (n + 1/2)

cyclotron frequency is q B / m

56
Q

How can we find the degeneracy per unit area in a landau level problem?

A

K_y values are related to the shifting of the QHO in x, thus, they are limited by the size of the x-axis of the system.
We can also use periodic boundary conditions in the y-axis to say that k_y = (2pi / y-axis length) x some integer

The range of k_y values can be divided by the k_y space volume element to find the degeneracy of states per unit area.
This tells us that for a larger magnetic field, there is increased degeneracy and more electrons can be accommodated.

degeneracy per unit area is e B / h

57
Q

What is the cause of the zeeman effect?

What is the perturbing potential?

A

The coupling between the electron magnetic moment and a B field.

The perturbing potential is - mu_b g B m_s

58
Q

What is the pauli-schrodinger equation?

A

The classical schrodinger equation but using 2-component spinors for up/down spin states.

The hamiltonian is the same as usual, but converted into 2x2 matrix form:

              the p^ term is pre-multiplied by {pauli dot}
              (before squaring)
              (canonical momentum for EM case) (check notes)
59
Q

What is the aharonov-bohm effect?

What does it imply?

A

Consider a charged particle moving on a cylindrical shell, there is a homogenous magnetic field through the cylinder (parallel to the axis) that DOES NOT PENETRATE the cylinder wall.

Even though the magnetic field is not present in the region “occupied” by the electrons, the energy levels STILL CHANGE.

  • —-> electron wavefunctions extend through all space
  • —-> while B = 0 in the electron region, the potential A is not equal to 0.
60
Q

What is the electric field in terms of the EM potentials?

What about the magnetic field?

A

Check notes

61
Q

What is the classical quantum probability density and continuity equation?

A

Prob. density = square magnitude of the wavefunction

Continuity equation:

partial w.r.t. t of prob. density + grad dot probability current = 0

The continuity eqn. can be used to find the form of the probability current.

62
Q

How can the K-G equation be derived?

A

Use the relativistic energy-momentum relation.
Square it to remove the sqrt (giving E^2 equation).
Use the correspondence principle.

63
Q

What is the K-G equation applicable to?

A

The K-G equation is the relativistic schrodinger equation for a spin 0 particle.

64
Q

What is the free-particle stationary state solution to the K-G equation?

A

=~ e^(i [k dot r - omega t])

65
Q

What continuity equation do we use for the K-G equation?

A

We use charge density and charge current, as the probability density we used previously cannot be used.
(why?)

in 4-vector notation, the continuity equation can be simply written as d_mu j^mu = 0.

66
Q

What is the form of the 4-current density for the K-G equation in the presence of external fields?

A

Check notes.

67
Q

What effect does the presence of external fields have on the K-G equation?

A

mc^2 –> mc^2 + s

d_mu —> d_mu + iq/hbar A_mu

68
Q

What ansatz for the radial part of the K-G hydrogen ground-state wavefunction should we use?

A

=~ r^epsilon x e^( -beta r)

where epsilon and beta can be determined in the non-relativistic limit.

69
Q

What is dirac hole theory?

A

All negative energy states are completely filled in the vacuum state (infinite spatial density). Electrons can be promoted to positive energy states, however this will leave a “hole”.
The “hole” will have positive energy (as it is the absence of a negative energy state), but all other properties such as charge will be opposite to the electron –> positron.

70
Q

What do we use for probability density in the dirac equation?
What about probability current?
What is the continuity equation?

A

Probability density is defined as classically for the schrodinger equation, simply the inner product of the wavefunction with itself. In the framework of 4-component spinors, this is just the inner product of each component with itself. (hermitian conjugate wavefunction * wavefunction)

The probability current is (hermitian conjugate wavefunction * alpha * wavefunction).

d/cdt{ prob. density } - del { prob. current } = 0

71
Q

What is an interpretation of the matrix beta?

A

Parity transformation

72
Q

What is the charge conjugate state in the dirac equation framework?

A

charge conjugate state =

- i alpha_2 beta [complex conjugate state]

73
Q

How can we show that the charge conjugate state actually has conjugate charge?

A

Take the complex conjugate of the dirac equation (given vector potential only for simplicity).
Pre-multiply by {-i alpha_2 beta} to recover the charge conjugate state.
The equation will be exactly the same as the initial one, except that the qA term will have opposite sign, as it is real.

74
Q

How can the standard spinor solutions to the free dirac equation be adjusted to apply to massless particles?

A

E = cp and m = 0.

The coefficient on one of the 2 components now takes the form of the HELICITY of the particle. For massless particles, helicity is CHIRALITY, +-1. We can therefore use a value lambda (+-1) instead of the coefficient.

this is the “helicity basis”.

75
Q

What is different in the treatment of the klein problem using the dirac equation rather than the klein-gordon equation?

A

The dirac equation is first-order so we can only impose continuity at the boundary on the wavefunction, not its derivative.

We must consider the incoming wave to be of one polarisation, but the reflected and transmitted waves can have either of the two polarisations. We can find that the reflected/transmitted waves are also actually polarised, using continuity.

We will get two equations for the coefficients of the incident, reflected and transmitted waves. Setting the incident coefficient to 1 gives us the coefficients for the other two components.

76
Q

How do we choose the parity of the two components of the dirac spinor in a central potential?

A

Choose them to have opposite parity. (i.e: they differ in quantum number l by 1)

The dirac parity operator commutes with the hamiltonian.

77
Q

What are the two values of the dirac quantum number k for j = l + 1/2 and j = l - 1/2 states?

A

j = l + 1/2
k = -(j + 1/2) = -l -1
j = l - 1/2
k = j + 1/2 = l

78
Q

What potential do we use with the central potential dirac radial equations for dirac hydrogen?

How can we then find the energy spectrum for dirac hydrogen?

A

coulomb potential V = -e Phi = - Z alpha hbar c / r
no scalar potential

NOT SURE - CHECK NOTES

The end result is the same as for K-G hydrogen, but with j in place of l.

79
Q

Why do we use a scalar potential in the bag model of quarks?

What scalar potential do we use?

A

The strong force is charge-independent.

Assume zero scalar potential within some radius ~ 1fm, then a finite scalar potential everywhere else.

Also assume m=0 in the bag model of quarks (negligible quark mass)

80
Q

What is the interpretation of the Sigma dirac operator?

A

Spin operator = hbar/2 * Sigma

81
Q

What is the lorentz transform operator? (dirac framework)

A

e^(1/2 w dot alpha)

w is parallel to direction of boost
tanh(w) = v/c

82
Q

What is the multiplication rule for alpha and beta matrices?

A

alpha_i beta = - beta alpha_i

83
Q

What is the hermitian conjugate of the alpha matrix?

A

The alpha matrix is unchanged (hermitian)

84
Q

What is the parity transformation of the alpha matrix?

A

beta alpha beta*

= -alpha

85
Q

What is a physical interpretation of the alpha matrix?

A

Generates pure translational lorentz boosts.

Hence the generator of lorentz boosts:
e^(1/2 w dot alpha)