Adv Marketing Flashcards
How is the pyramid / hierarchy of objectives structure?
- Purpose (aspirational “Why are we here?”)
- Mission/Vision/Values
- Corporate objectives
- Departmental objectives
- Indiv. Objectives
What is Purpose, Mission, Vision, Values
- Purpose = aspirational, share a dream, builds community and unites people around a common passion
- Mission = what do we do?
- Vision = what’s our ideal reality?
- Values = what do we believe in?
What could be departmental objectives for Marketing and what should they always include?
- Marketing examples: increase sales, market share, grow brand awareness, launch new product, increase customer retention
- All objectives must include KPIs to track implementation
What is the “difference” of STP and Marketing mix?
The STP is the theoretical plan and the Marketing Mix is how you execute it/Interpret it
What is in the marketing mix?
- 4 Ps –> tangibles
- 7 Ps –> services: Price, Process, Product, People, Place, Physical evidence, Promotion
What are the 5Cs and what are the there for?
-Before deciding on STP and marketing mix: Analysis
- Context: Macro environment
- Customers (who are they? why they buy)
- Competition
- Collaborators
- Company (resources & capabilities)
What is marketing myopia?
Defining competitors with very/too narrow criteria (leaving important competitors out)
Measurement and Monitoring
- Measuring and keeping track of performance
- Evaluating performance against goals
- Taking corrective action
- Feeds into future budget allocation & planning
Budgeting and Allocation
- Correct allocation of resources to support the marketing mix activities
- Prioritization of goals
- Data driven for best results ( from past campaigns)
First mover advantage: advantages
- Potential rewards: ease of recall, brand loyalty, economies of scale and experience, high market share at beginning
First mover advantage: disadvantages
- Disadvantages: free-rider effects, technological discontinuities, shifting consumer tastes
First mover advantage in general
- Strategy by which a player gains competitive advantage in a market by being the first to establish itself, It is an opportunity but not a success advantage per se / head start
- Long-term survival rate about 36%
- While pioneers often fail, it is early leaders that succeed (enter the market 13 years after)
- Timing alone will not be a major long-term success factor
Imitation/ Fast follower (what is it?, advantages and disadvantages)
- Opposite of first mover
- prevalent in Tech sector
- Strategy by which a player imitates the innovations or strategy of the market leader
- Typically aligned with a lower price
- Potential rewards: gains from the challenges that first movers face and the opportunities that emerge; comparatively quick and efficient strategy
- Disadvantages: incompatible with market leadership (lacking innovation as only copying),
Market coverage | Fighter brand (strategy, fighter brand, advantages, disadvantages)
- Strategy by which a player closes off opportunities to competitors by closing gaps in the market
- Usually done by launching line extensions or new brands targeted at unserved segments of the market (e.g. fighter brand)
- One part. example of this strategy:Fighter brand = low-value brand within a portfolio, designed to compete against low-price competition, while protecting the firm’s premium price offerings
- E.g. Luvs: cut R&D budget, cheaper, lower features (increased value of Pampers)
- Potential rewards: captures the low-end of the market
- Disadvantages: if not executed properly, it can lead to cannibalization, financial losses, management distraction, needs to sustain long term–>margin needs to be sustainable nevertheless
Altius Golf Case: Altius, Problem, Solution
Altius:
- Prior to downturn: 60% of industry revenues, 85% of profits
- Victor TX line very successful: positioning: the most popular choice for professionals, also have midrange ball
- Gross Margin of golf ball a lot higher than competitors: 70%
- Altus offered margins to retailers at the lower end of the range
- On-Course: shops on the premises of golf courses and clubs (targeted to more serious players, more personal)
- Off-Course Channel: golf specialty stores, sporting goods stores (targeted towards casual players, lower price)
Problem:
- Industry downturn
- Market has become more price-sensitive; lower-priced competitors have gained higher market share
- New generation of golfers: casual golfers, more fun, affordable, accessible
- Market is shrinking, however, competition is winning
- Sales shifted from on-course pro shops (altius strong) to off-course retailers
- Retailers get more bargaining power
- Problem will increase in the long run
- Big Problem as loss of 2,9% of market share (units) translates into about 10% loss of yearly variable profits
Solution?
- tap into new customer (and growing) segment
- increase market share
- Increase CLV (customer livetime value)Potential to upsell
Endorsement:
Three Options
- ALTIUS PRODUCT (“Altius Elevate”)
- Brand recognition
- Problem of cannibalization rather low because the company would target two different markets and segments
- Potential to upsell as customers are brand loyal
- (brand erosion)
- ENDORSEMENT (Elevate, by Altius)
- Differentiated brand but still linked to ALtius & pos. reputation, connection to market. leader
- Will increase market share, tap into new customer segment who are more price sensitive, chance to increase CLV, potential to upsell
- If Altius lowers its price, competition will as well but Altius should keep the price always a little higher than competition because of brand recognition (and then let retailers profit from it!)
- (brand erosion)
- STAND ALONE BRAND
- No brand recognization
How to calculate significance 2,9% in market share (vol.)? given: Total Mkt. Sales (483 mio), Mkt. Share ($, 55,2%), retailer margin (15%), Gross Margin(70%), Market Share (units, 35,1%)?
Look into summary doc
Is Altius attractive to retailers? How should Altius price its product?
- If Altius matches its competitors in terms of price and retailer margin, retailers will be indifferent between brands (but due to Altius’ brand recognition retailers will be selling its products)
- If Altius decides to include an endorsement and have a higher price, it is possible to give the additional profit to the retailer, making it push its products more
- The company’s reputation can be used to sell at a higher price
What do you need to keep in mind when introducing a fighter strategy?
- Low price vs value positioning
Lowering the total value of the product in the eyes of the customer, not just the price
Aligning with the needs of a different target: the total benefits provided by the brand as a whole should be relevant & distinct to one group - Maintain a clear differentiation compared to the premium product in the portfolio
Why would the existing premium paying customers not switch to the lower priced version if the difference is only the price?
The degree of cannibalization will depend on the distinct customer needs and the ability to keep the brands separate; literally (e.g. channels); figuratively (e.g. brand perceptions in the mind of the consumer) - Long-term financial sustainability of the strategy
Profit margins & volume expectations should be sustainable in the long-term
Not a short-term promotion that will go away
Buffers for the downward extension risks
Distribution and promotion channel split
Customer needs & priorities: Pros will know what a good ball is, Amateurs will look to other markers of quality
Strategic role of ‘entry point’ brands in the portfolio
Transition customers from entry product to more premium ones (upselling) as they progress from amateur to more serious player
Segmentation: Demographic Criteria
Population Density, Population Growth, Income, Income Growth, Age, Gender, Family Size, Education
Segmentation: Behavioral Criteria
Past Purchases, Browsing Behavior, Length of Stay, Visit Frequency, Churn Probability
Segmentation: Psychographic Criteria
Mindset, Goals, Lifestyle, Values
Correlated Spatial Preferences
Geographical targeting also important
- reasons why you live in specific area
- income levels, jobs, good schools
- people who live in same places often similar
Which targeting has the highest predictive power? 1.-3.
- Behavioral
- Demographics
- Psychographics
What is the downturn of behavioral targeting and how can we use
- We lack the behavioral data when targeting new customers
- But we can use linear regression to see which demo/psychographics are explainatory for customers behavior with old customers
- Then we can conclude which demo/psychographics we want to target which could predict their behavior as a customer
Desirable Properties of Segments
LIDS
- Large: Each segment is large enough to be useful (and interpret them )
- Identifiable: Can easily assign customers to their segments
- Distinctive: Segments don’t overlap
- Stable: Minimize changes over time (avoid re-segmenting over and over)
What is Targeting?
A process, following segmentation, whereby a firm determines which segment(s) to serve (and how) and which segment(s) to ignore: for the ones we want to serve, we may want to use different marketing mixes
Desirable Properties of Targets
PFD
- Potential: Sizable(big enough) and growing (big targets that are growing)
- Fit: Must fit with core competences (“I should be the one best serving the targets”)
- Defensibility: Advantage over competitors
Calyx Flower Case: Calyx, Industry, Key Takeaways
Calyx Case:
- Four business units: Bear Gram (personalized bears; main customers are men), PajamaGram (gift chosen from broad assortment of pajamas, gowns, robes, and spa products; female customers specifically targeted), Tasty Gram Delivery Service (regional food specialities delivered home), and Calyx Flowers (fresh flower delivery service)
- Orders are received by phone or through a website, flowers are arranged and packaged for shipment there and sent out with a card
- Flowers are delivered within overnight or the next day to ensure fresh flowers which last longer than the ones from the competition
- Strengths: Delivered in buds for longevity/freshness &Variety
- The company has arrangements with growers around the world (some flowers are flown in from foreign farms)
- Promotion primarily through ten million catalogs: four million are mailed to prior customers (response rate 4.5%), one million send to flower recipients, rest sent to rented mailing lists (response rate 1%),
- 50% margin nevertheless has not reached full financial performance
Industry:
- Demand is seasonal with high peaks around holidays
- Efficient Distribution is crucial (growers –> distributors –> wholesalers –> retailers)
Retail competition:
- Retail florists - prepare custom bouquets, provide flower arrangement services
- 1-800-Flowers.com - network of 500 florists and own warehouse facilities (huge amount of money spend in advertisement)
- FTD (Florists’ Transworld Delivery) - largest floral company in the world (20 000 North American retail florists, accounting for 10% of all floral sales), invest a lot in advertisement
- Supermarkets - lower prices but also lower flower variety and service
Key Takeaways:
CATALOGS
- ROI too low(especially mailing list & recipients)
- Only send to current customers? Do not know whether current customers would also buy without catalogs
–> we are missing control condition
- Numbers only look at one period, after one period some become current customers which then have 4,5% responce rate instead of 1%.
- Seasonal effects might have influence on numbers from catalogs
–> do not increase catalogs
–> increase internet marketing
SEGMENTATION & TARGETING
- Identify need-based segments
- Compare own values/strengths with competitors, Identify competitive offerings
- Determine which segments to target
- Link identifiable characteristics for marketing communications and distribution
- Optimal Value Proposition: Intersection of firm competences with consumer needs
o Calyx’ values Longevity & Variety intersects with segment “home décor”s needs
Benefits of need-based segmentation: potentially higher acquisition costs, but higher conversion rates too
-> Higher return on customer acquisition
STP Process
- Group customers based on similar needs
- Assess attractiveness of each segment & select
- Define the value proposition for the selected target
Positioning
- Positioning is the act of ‘designing the company’s offer and image so that it occupies a distinct and valued place in the target customer’s mind’ (Keller, 2008)
- Positioning is the desired brand meaning
- Helps guide marketing strategy by clarifying what a brand is about, how it is unique and how it is similar to competitive brands, and why should consumers purchase/use the brand
- Captured in the Positioning Statement: A strategic internal statement used to guide tactical executions
Positioning map
- Visual presentation of what consumers think about the brand (not managers perception)
Positioning Statement
- Target: For whom? When? Where?
- Competitive set: relative to whom?
- Unique value proposition: what value?
- Reason to believe: Why? How?
- The positioning statement is a strategic internal statement that guides tactical executions, by answering the questions of who the target and competition are, what the main value it offers and how
VOSS:
“For upscale consumers looking to make a design statement with their choice of water, Voss is the only brand among all bottled waters that offers the purest and most distinctive drinking experience, because it derives from an artesian source in southern Norway and is packaged in a stylish, iconic glass bottle.”
What can you need to consider when building the unique value proposition? / Kinds to do it
PoP: Points of Parity
or
PoD: Points of Difference
Points of Parity
Category PoPs
- Necessary associations to be a legitimate and credible player within a category
- Necessary, but not sufficient for choice
- Important when a brand is extending to a different kind of category
- Establish competence and credibility
Competitive PoPs
- Associations designed to negate a competitor’s Point of Difference
- Trying to ‘break-even’ on important associations
–>
Vertical differentiation: Stress superiority on PoPs
- Claiming that you have the most innovative app (claiming differentiation on a point of parity)
- Westin: didn’t just offer a bed, heavenly bed promised the best sleeping experience (all hotels offer beds)
- You are better than others with the same product!
Points of Difference
- Strong, favorable and unique associations
- May be based on any type of attribute, benefit or value association
- Customers must believe they cannot find the same attribute/benefit/value in a competitor, can be:
- Functional: performance-related considerations
- Abstract: Image-related - Horizontal differentiation: based on unique attribute
- Focuses on a unique point of difference that nobody talks about / or had
- You are delivering something new
Unique Value proposition: Success criteria
Relevance = Something that consumers need (a watch that was fun, trendy and not too expensive)
Differentation = different than competitors
Credible = company’s know-how and resources
Claims laddering
Claims laddering: Laddering of claims from attributes to benefits and values for better communication of the value proposition
Attributes: most basic, must
Benfits: builds up on attributes, what is benefit from attribute /feature
Values: more abstract
Builds up on each other –> Value best
Cialis
- Market is already well-educated about the product but the market leader has a strong positioning
Need based segmentation:
- Current User& Dropouts –> Duration
- Optimal Value Proposition: Intersection of firm competences with consumer needs
Cialis Marketing Funnel / who needs to be addressed:
Doctors - Purchase
- Gate-keepers
- However, highly risk averse and targeted by Pfizer
- Bombarded with new drugs every year
- Push Strategy: engage with doctors
Patients - Every stage
- Patients mostly bring the issue up with doctors
- Cialis is differentiated from Viagra, for both patients and partners; clear benefit is longer duration
- Pull Strategy: have patients ask for the drug
Consideration/Inform, Convert/Purchase, Engage/loyalty - Partners
- Are involved, huge pressure also on them, brings more flexibility to them
Vertical Positioning
- Focus on duration only: it is a clear positioning based on a feature
- Clear ranking possible
- Cialis lasts for 36h while competition lasts for 4h
- But 36h do not convey the benefits, easily attachable (Viagra could improve) how does that clinical feature effect the consumers’ lifes?
Horizontal Positioning
- How does that vertical positioning translate into preferences
- Cialis more based on intimacy, romantic (not only talking about duration anymore)
- Now, harder for competition to copy (Viagra could just be optimized to 40h)
Case Objectives:
- implement segmentation
- Introduce marketing funnel
- introduce push vs. pull strategies
- Vertical/ horizontal positioning
Marketing Funnel
- Attract /Awareness
- Inform / COnsideration
- Convert / Conversion /Purchase
- Engagement / Loyalty
- hurdles which customers have to overcome
Pull strategy - Push strategy
Pull: Target Consumers and make them want to buy
Push: Target Intermediaries (Retailers, doctors) to make them sell product
Repositioning the Competition
- Position yourself by telling what you are doing better than your competition
Product Portfolio
The complete range of products produced by a business, including product lines and individual products
Product line
a group of products that are closely related to each other, and are viewed as a unit because of marketing, technical, or end-use considerations (sold under the same name bc they function in the same way, marketed to similar customers, etc.)
Product Portfolio Management strategy goal
- Goal: portfolio that covers a variety of needs while not overlapping; maximizing the value of the portfolio of the company
- Balancing market coverage without having overlaps (diminishing risk of cannibalization)
Product Portfolio Breadth & Depth
- Breadth: company’s separate the divisions / categories /segments (e.g. kids/men/women in fashion business)
- Depth: “looking into segments/categories, each include several brands, each with own structures and product lines” number of items in product lines or how company can satisfy sub segments with different tastes/price sensitivities
Why is portfolio management important?
- Many companies show large, inefficient portfolios
- Several companies have undergone a process of cutting down the portfolio for higher efficiencies
What can happen when a product portfolio has too few brands?
- Too few brands: company is limiting its growth potential and opens the door for competitors to target the market gap
Managing the portfolio: What happens when too many products?
inefficient complexity, reducing profits, stretching budget to thin
Benefits of good product portfolio
- Benefits: efficient allocation of resources, identify underperforming products & gaps for growth potential
Optimal number of products?
Services (smaller PP) vs Products
Fast-moving vs Durables (smaller PP)
Concentrated vs dispersed competition
More brands: higher consumer loyalty and company value, but higher advertising, selling & administrative spending
BCG matrix
-Axen: Market share & Category/Segment growth/potential
- Portfolio management framework for prioritizing businesses/brands by degree of profitability (guides the allocation of budgets and the movement of cash)
- Ideally, the excess cash from Cash Cows (products with minimal investment generate excess cash) is invested in Question marks, so that they become Stars
- Stars ideally become Cash Cows once category growth slows down
- Pets? Discontinuing them, however, now BCG recommends to analyze pets to maximize information value
- Healthy and stable portfolio: have question marks, cash cows and stars
Strategic Brand Roles
6
- Strategic/Power/Focus brands: strong financial results, high loyalty, strong future momentum
- Fighter brand: low-value offering
- Niche brand: specific narrowly defined market
- Past Champion: past strategic brands/ cash cows: maintain sales levels without need for significant support
- Silver bullet: help establish/maintain the overall brand image by adding important accessories
- Entry Point: affordably priced product to serve as entry point to the brand (Longchamp)
Strategic Brand Roles
6
- Strategic/Power/Focus brands: strong financial results, high loyalty, strong future momentum
- Fighter brand: low-value offering
- Niche brand: specific narrowly defined market
- Past Champion: past strategic brands/ cash cows: maintain sales levels without need for significant support
- Silver bullet: help establish/maintain the overall brand image by adding important accessories
- Entry Point: affordably priced product to serve as entry point to the brand (Longchamp)
Line pruning
- Pruning the portfolio & restructuring takes time to succeed (if at all)
Line filling
- A brand extension is when a firm uses an established brand name to introduce a new product
- Parent brand = brand that creates an extension
- Family brand = if the parent brand is already associated with several products through extensions
- Extensions are broadly classified into four categories (Line extensions (portfolio depth), Category extensions (portfolio breadth), Customer extensions, Channel extensions)
Line Extensions
- portfolio depth
Transfers the existing brand name to a new product within the same or closely related product line - New flavors (coke zero cherry), ingredients, formats, packaging, size
- Horizontal: Stretching horizontally at the same quality level to
accommodate different tastes (low risk, change is not radical, usually) - Vertical: down market & upmarket (can become risky), on products with different price-value positions (down market: cheap product from luxury brand – no clear differentiation may led to customers switching to the lower version / damage brand)
- High-priced products: increase the sales of other products and communicate expertise & brand prestige
Category extensions
- portfolio breadth
- Transferring of a brand name to a new product or service outside of the original product category (more risky de to unfamiliar territory, how well do the primary associations of the brand fit the new product?)
e.g. Doritos introducing salsas, Colgate wanting to sell Lasagnas
Customer extensions
Using existing brand on new products or services sold to a different customer segment
e.g. Dove introducing men-line
Channel extensions
Expand to a different distribution channel (e.g. Luxury channel to mainstream)
e.g. amazonGO as physical stores
Asymmetric dominance
- Decoy effect
- a phenomenon whereby consumers change their preference between two options when presented with a third option – the “decoy” – that is “asymmetrically dominated” (e.g. Popcorn im Kino); the decoy is priced to make one of the other options more attractive
- Web 59, print &web 125, print only 125 (decoy option)
Compromise effect
Argues a consumer is more likely to choose the middle option in a product set over more extreme options (Tall, Grande, Venti)
Leveraging brand into new offerings - Where to extend?
- Associations – which are leverageable? (existing associations & brand identity, common characteristics/sources of also.: user types, ingredients, symbols..)
- Identify product categories for which there would be a fit (Vaseline- moisturizing->body care; medicinal -> antiseptic, sunscreen)
- Evaluate the category in terms of business attractiveness
- The extension concept: positioning (position similarly or different)
- Example Failures: Carlsberg, perfume Harley-Davidson, Airbnb online experience
Kinds of Brand architecture
- Brand House (FedEx:Express, FedEx:…): Incr. brand awareness, negative impact risk
- Sub Brands (Apple:apple iPhone, apple iPad, appletv): quality assurance, individuality -> better targeting, contamination risk, high costs when launching
- Endorsed Brands (Marriot): better targeting through Indi. identities, contamination risk, cost new brand
- House of Brands (P&G: Pringles, head&shoulders): low contamination risk, ownership for mangers, expensive, no equity build on parent brand
Kinds of Brand architecture
- Brand House (FedEx:Express, FedEx:…): Incr. brand awareness, negative impact risk
- Sub Brands (Apple:apple iPhone, apple iPad, appletv): quality assurance, individuality -> better targeting, contamination risk, high costs when launching
- Endorsed Brands (Marriot): better targeting through Indi. identities, contamination risk, cost new brand
- House of Brands (P&G: Pringles, head&shoulders): low contamination risk, ownership for mangers, expensive, no equity build on parent brand
Conditions of justifying the creation of a new brand
- All existing brands have associations that are incompatible with the new offering
- The offering would damage the brand name
- A new name is needed to realize the chance to create and own an association
- Only a new name would signal the newness of the offering
- An acquired brand has a significant loyalty that would be at risk if a name change were to occur
- A channel conflict requires a separate name
- The business is of sufficient size and longevity to justify investing in a new brand