adolescence 2 - the other adolescent Pavis and Cunningham - male youth and street culture Flashcards
Why was this study done?
because there was growing concern about youth, especially young men and how they spend their leisure time
ie. drinking, smoking, illicit drugs, alcohol, hanging out, nuisance
what is moral panic?
- refers to blowing a situation out of proportion and creating an anxiety around it
- creating the elevated idea of danger and risk
- there is a shift away from seeing those behaviors as isolates, they are contextualized to see how many people believe this
“the media attention and piecemeal policy reflect the moral panic that surrounds these young people and their behavior”
What does much of the literature focus on?
high-risk behaviours vs. a more contextualized understanding of the complexities of this specific youth culture and the place of their health-relevant behaviours within the matrix of their activites and associated meanings
something different
- they wanted to understand the meanings and motivations of the people on the streets
- allows them to gain insight into the diverse shifting, and value-laden contexts in which touths health related behaviours occurs
- they demonstrate important links between their street culture and their health
ie. includes tole of immediate and broader socio-economic and psychological factors
How did they conduct this study?
methodology
methodology
- part of a larger mix of methods (qualitative and quantitative)
- surveys and interviews
- looked at participant observation
- researcher tried to be a part of the local context
why did they narrow the focus to leisure time
it is where they were most likely to smoke, drink, and experiment with drugs
Methods:
ethnography and participant observation
ethnography
- means a description of people or an ethnic group - the descriptions written of people are called ethnography
- fieldwork is also referred to as ethnography
participant observation
- researcher joins the group and spends a significant amount of time observing their interactions and participating in as many domains of social life as possible
- first hand observational data
- semi-constructed interviews with youth and community workers
- 70 hrs of field work
- 7pm - 3am
- usually fri-sat
Cold approaching
- during the initial phase the fieldworker spent his time walking around and observing and recording where the you people normally gathered
- made himself seen
the intrigue factor
- because he was unfamiliar to the people who hung around that area, they were curious
- they approached him
- different ways the participants perceived the researcher, would they give him the time of day
Why is the intrigue factor effective
accessing participants like this is effective because it is
- naturalistic
- secures trust
why did he have to be careful during the intrigue phase
- was always careful to explain his intentions
- most astonished they were interested in their lives
- as project progressed, contact, trust and quality of interaction grew
dilemmas about field work
- there are never clear-cut ways to gain access to the field site and relevant population
- the role of intimidation, allegations, feeling uncomfortable, sticking out
- ethical concerns