Adjacent Owner Issues & Use Restrictions - Part 1 - Chapters 37-40 Flashcards
Understand the limitations and restrictions on use mutually agree to by all property owners in a subdivision document in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs)
Developers subdivide land into two or more horizontal or vertical sections called lots, parcels or units. Having created a subdivision, developers place restrictive covenants on how the lots may be used by later owners called successors. Use restrictions are usually contained in the CCnRs and are typically recorded with the original subdivision map. Recorded documents in the chain of title to a parcel of RE place a buyer on constructive notice of their contents.
A prospective buyer of a home in a subdivision protects themselves from unknowingly buying property burdened with unwanted restrictions by reviewing a preliminary title report (PRELIM) prior to acquiring a property. A Prelim discloses the results of the title company’s search of the property title history. As a customer service, title companies supply copies of any CCnRs of record to buyers or their agents on request.
Distinguish between affirmative and negative covenants
An AFFIRMATIVE COVENANT is recorded restrictions that can LIMIT THE USE of a property to a SPECIFIC purpose (like school, railroad, highway, dwelling, or irrigation system). This type of restriction is classified as an AFFIRMATIVE covenant.
A NEGATIVE COVENANT is another type of recorded restriction which prohibits identified uses of the property. PROHIBITIVE restrictions are classified as NEGATIVE covenant. For example, a typical NEG Covenant prohibits the sale of alcoholic beverages or other activities otherwise allowed to take place on the property.
Determine when a covenant runs with title to the land
Recorded CCnRs find future owners of the subdivided lots, a scheme referred to a covenants RUNNING with the LAND. For a covenant to RUN WITH THE LAND and affect title and future owners, the restriction needs to DIRECTLY BENEFIT the property. Thus, to benefit one lot, all lots within the subdivision need to be burdened by the restriction.
Understand the circumstances by which CC&nRs may be amended or removed if they pose an unlawful restriction
Restrictions on selling, leasing or encumbrancing RE may NOT unreasonably restrict the marketability of the property, even if the restriction is contained in a trust deed or lease agreement.
However, due-on-sale clauses contained in a trust deed are no longer controlled by CA law and under federal mortgage law, are enforceable on the transfer of any interest in real estate EXCEPT,
- short-term leases up to 3 years not coupled with a purchase option
- intra-family transfers with 1-4 unit owner-occupied residential property on the death of an owner or for equity financing.
CCnRs on the install of Solar are unenforceable if the restrictions significantly increase the cost of the system or decrease its efficiency by:
- resulting in more than a 20% increase in install cost
- decrease the operating efficiency of solar by more than 20%
affirmative covenant
An AFFIRMATIVE Covenant is a recorded restriction limiting the use of a property to a specific purpose.
negative covenant
A NEGATIVE Covenant is a recorded restriction prohibiting identified uses of a property (like alcohol).
Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs)
Covenants, Conditions n Restrictions (CCnRs) are recorded restrictions against the title to real estate prohibiting or limiting specified uses of the property.
Identify common boundaries and common boundary improvements
Most properties have 3 property lines setting the Common Boundary. The location of the common property lines are frequently represented by a demarcation of the property line called a common boundary improvement. Examples of Common Boundary Improvements include:
- party wall
- boundary fence
- tree line
- driveway
- ditch
Understand the types of common boundaries and the rights of adjacent property owners relative to them
The rights of adjacent property owners when setting up, maintaining or removing common boundary improvements depend on the type of improvement which exists.
- A party wall is co-owned by the adjacent property owners. the owners share the cost of maintaining the party wall
- boundary fence may be a party wall co-owned by the adjacent property owners. If an owner has an unfenced land, later decides to enclose it by using his neighbors existing fence, they need to compensate the neighbor who built the fence for the pro rata value.
- trees or shrubbery whose trunks stand party on the land of two adjacent property owners are called common boundary trees. Much like the party walls, co-ownership of common boundary trees includes maintenance of the trees.
Additionally, co owners cannot alter or remove party walls or common boundary tress without the consent of the other co-owner.
common boundary improvement
A common boundary improvement is an improvement which acts as a demarcation of the property line.
common boundary trees
Common Boundary Trees or ‘Line Trees’ are shrubs or trees with trunks which stand partly on the land of two adjacent properties belonging to the adjacent owners. These ‘Tenants in Common’ who own the Line Trees are jointly responsible for maintaining the trees.
nuisance
A nuisance is an action which is injurious to health, offensive to the senses, or obstructs the use and enjoyment of surrounding property.
party wall
A party wall is a common boundary improvement located on a property line between adjacent properties, such as a wall, fence or building co-owned by the adjacent property owners.
The use and ownership of party walls is best set fort in a written agreement, but these agreements rarely exist. An adjoining property owners cannot remove or destroy a party wall without Adj neighbors consent. An owner can alter a party wall as long as they do not injure the wall or interfere with the adj neighbors use of the party wall.
Determine whether an encroachment exists extending onto real estate belonging to another person without their consent
An encroachment is an improvement on real estate which extends onto real estate belonging to another person without their consent. Thus, encroachments frequently take the form of a:
*building
* fence
* driveway
* tree
The concept of an encroachment is closely related to trespass, nuisance and boundary disputes. All involved an interference with another person’s property rights.
All that is needed to establish the existence of an encroachment is a survey locating the property line. If an improvement on one parcel extends over the line onto the an adjacent parcel, it is an encroachment.
Understand and apply any remedies available to an owner of property burdened by an encroachment.
Once an encroachment has been determined, the remedies available to the owner include:
- an INJUNCTION ordering the removal of the encroaching structure
- money losses for the diminished value of the property
An owner is entitled to terminate or prevent an unauthorized intrusion onto their RE. However, when a building or other substantial improvement encroached on an owner’s property, the neighbor’s cost of removing the encroachment may far exceed the damage inflicted on the owner burdened by the encroachment. Thus the encroachment is allowed to continue and the owner is awarded money losses for the lost use of their property, called BALANCING HARDSHIPS or BALANCING EQUITIES.
The conditions for balancing hardships , ie merely granting money losses an allowing an encroachment to continue are:
- the owner of the property affected by the encroach may not suffer an irreparable injury due to the continued existence of the encroachment.
- the neighbor who owns the encroaching structure needs to have acted innocently and in GOOD FAITH
- the cost to the neighbor of removing the encroachment needs to greatly exceed the damage.
The owner seeking to terminate an encroachment or recover money losses for the encroachment, they have to act within a THREE YEAR PERIOD of the statue of limitations, unless the losses due to an encroachment are progressive over time. If the owner delays too long before making their claim, the encroaching neighbor earns the right to maintain the encroachment without paying money. The limitations period does not run from the discovery of the encroachment, but from the creation date of the encroachment.