ADHD 1 Flashcards

1
Q

characteristics of ADHD - DSM-V

A

hyperactivity, impulsivity and attentional problems

DSM 5: ADHD – ‘A persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that interferes with functioning or development’

  • often has difficulty sustaining attention in tasks or play activities (A)
  • often fidgets with or taps hands or feet or squirms in seat (H/I)

several symptoms have to be present before age 12 and manifest in more than one context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 presentations of ADHD in DSM-V

A

predominantly inattentive
predominantly hyperactive-impulsive
combined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ICD-11

A

ADHD (2010) - ‘a persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that has a direct negative impact on …. functioning’

very similar to the DSM definition - came later than it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

prevalence of ADHD in UK - gender difference

A

5% of children/adolescents in UK

3 : 1 , boys : girls

presents differently in boys (hyperactive) and girls (inattentive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

change in ADHD symptoms with age

A

symptoms continue into adulthood in 8-43% of cases (gender gap may narrow with age)

some think it can develop in adulthood, not just childhood

activity issues decline with age (hyperactive)
attentional issues remain (inattentive)

maybe gender imbalance in children due to how it is diagnosed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

treatments for ADHD

A

in children over 5, adolescents, and adults:

drug treatment - Adderall (DL-amphetamine) or methylphenidate

these are drugs of abuse (class B) - but are prescribed to children as young as 6

very effective medications - but need non-addictive instead as this could be an issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

estimated medical and non-medical cost of ADHD + reasons why

A

£2.4billion (children and adolescents in UK)

due to:

  • parental income loss
  • juvenile detention
  • medication costs
  • schooling etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

history of ADHD full timeline (9)

A

1902 - George Frederic Still - paediatrician described 20 cases of children

1917-28 - encephalitis lethargica epidemic - associated symptoms of ADHD with brain damage - called it postencephalitic-type behaviour disorder

1940/50s - minimal brain damage as a cause of postencephalitic-type behaviour disorder

1960s - minimal brain dysfunction (MBD) - hyperkinetic impulse disorder could occur without brain damage - changed label to dysfunction

1968 - DSM-II : hyperkinetic reaction of childhood - label of MBD as too broad so focus on specific symptoms (esp hyperactivity)

1980 - DSM III - “Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) (with or without hyper-activity)” - three separate symptom lists for inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity - big jump from saying hyperactivity was essential for the disorder previously

1987 - DSM III-R “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder” - first time having ADHD written in a diagnostic manual, brough the symptom lists together

1994 - DSM - IV - first time ADHD was said to be able to be present in adults as well as children

2013 - DSM - V - very similar to the 1994 definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

history of ADHD - first description

A

1902 - George Fredric Still

  • paediatrician
  • described 20 cases of children with: “defect of moral control…. without general impairment of intellect and without physical disease”
  • “the immediate gratification of self without regard either to the good of others or to the larger and more remote good of self”
  • “fidgety….”
  • “a quite abnormal incapacity for sustained attention”

what we now think of as ADHD
“moral control” meaning not considering others as much, not right and wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

history of ADHD - 1917-1928

A

epidemic of encephalitis lethargica (brain swelling)

had levels of severity

bad cases = can become rigid - eye muscles become paralysed so the eyes roll and stay open and upwards

many died

many affected children who survived the encephalitis, subsequently showed abnormal behaviour

“Postencephalitic behaviour disorder”:

  • children often became: hyperactive, distractible, irritable, antisocial, destructive, unruly, and unmanageable in school

first association with brain damage

because encephalitis = brain swelling –> idea that similar symptoms seen in ADHD may also be associated with brain damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

history of ADHD - 1940s/50s

A

minimal brain damage

assumption that minimal damage to the brain, even when it cannot be demonstrated objectively, causes postencephalitic-type behaviour disorder

became practice to infer brain damage from behaviour even when there’s no evidence of it - bad practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

history of ADHD - 1960s

A

Minimal brain dysfunction (MBD)

Became clear that this disorder (“hyperkinetic impulse disorder”) could occur in the absence of explicit brain damage

The Oxford International Study Group of Child Neurology therefore advocated a shift in terminology by replacing the term “minimal brain damage” by “minimal brain dysfunction”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

history of ADHD - 1968

A

change from a broad label (MBD) to more focused in on specific symptoms - especially hyperactivity

DSM-II : hyperkinetic reaction of childhood
(DSM-I had no section about children in it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

history of ADHD - 1980

A

throughout 70s, developing realisation that attentional problems were as significant, or more significant, than hyperactivity in this patient group

1980 - DSM III - “Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) (with or without hyper-activity)”

hyperactivity was no longer an essential diagnostic criterion for the disorder

developed three separate symptom lists for:

  • inattention
  • impulsivity
  • hyperactivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

history of ADHD - 1987

A

DSM III-R “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder”

brought symptom list together

merge things together into one disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

history of ADHD - 1994, 2000, 2013

A

DSM - IV (1994)

  • first time ADHD was said to be able to be present in adults as well as children

DSM - IV - TR (2000)

DSM - V (2013)

17
Q

things ADHD impacts

A

DSM 5: There is clear evidence that the symptoms interfere with or reduce the quality of:
* social
* academic
* or occupational functioning

18
Q

impact of ADHD on educational attainment

A

Fleming et al. (2017):

NHS and Scotland database of school leavers

ADHD vs non-ADHD
Likelihood of Sub-GCSE qualifications

ADHD = poorer academic attainment

19
Q

impact of ADHD on occupational attainment

A

Klein et al. (2012)

Adults (mean age 41) diagnosed with ADHD at 6 -12 years of age (vs controls)

results:

employment: 84% ADHD and 95% control
occupational level: 4.7 ADHD and 3.0 control ( done on a scale)
median salary: $60k ADHD and $100k control

20
Q

impact of ADHD on peer relations

A

Hoza et al (2005)

children with ADHD (7.0-9.9 years of age) and same sex classmates

ADHD kids were found to be less popular, more rejected - similar number were average and unclassified

21
Q

impact of ADHD on physical health problems

A

Lange et al. (2016)

Accidents over the last 12 months requiring medical treatment in children with ADHD (10.4 years old) and controls

ADHD = 23%
Control = 15.3%

OR for accidents was 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.34-1.91)

22
Q

impact of ADHD on mental health problems (4)

A

Larson et al (2010)

study of around 5000 kids with ADHD
age 6-17

much higher rates of anxiety and depression in kids with ADHD than in others

anxiety:
17% ADHD
2% other

depression
14% ADHD
2% other

autism
6% ADHD
1% other

Tourette’s
~1% ADHD
minimal other

therefore hard to study due to many comorbidities

23
Q

impact of ADHD on drug addiction

A

Levy et al (2014)

ADHD as a kid = more likely to have non-alcohol based drug dependence

ADHD ~ 11%
control ~ 2%

24
Q

2 classical theories of ADHD

A

frontal cortex
dopamine

25
Q

frontal cortex theory of ADHD - task used to compare frontal cortex damage and ADHD

A

evidence from:

Neuropsychology
Structural imaging
Functional imaging

the symptoms of ADHD are similar to the changes following frontal cortex damage

Impulsivity – Iowa Gambling Task:

  • disadvantageous or advantageous decks of cards used - either lose or gain overall
  • disadvantageous has higher win per card but also much higher loss per 10 cards
  • tendency to be pulled towards the possibility of big gains from individual cards rather than overall gain = cognitive impulsivity in ADHD

Bechara et al (1994) - frontal cortex damage:

  • controls = normal or brain damage
  • target = frontal cortex damage - patient EVR and EVR-type participants (EVR had damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex)
  • controls made more advantageous choices than the target group with frontal brain damage

Miller et al (2013) - ADHD:

  • people with ADHD made fewer advantageous choices than control group
  • delay aversion in ADHD - want rewards ASAP

as similar patterns are seen in frontal brain damage and ADHD - investigate the correlation

26
Q

Barkley’s theory of ADHD

A

behavioural disinhibition theory of ADHD (executive)

sees poor behavioural inhibition as the central deficiency in ADHD

accounts for attentional and kinetic symptoms

self-control

27
Q

clinical case of frontal cortex damage

A

Phineas Gage

frontal lobe damage caused behaviour change

28
Q

MRI study of frontal cortex

A

structural observations

frontal lobe grey matter volume is lower in those with ADHD

29
Q

functional study of frontal cortex

A

PET scan (positron emission tomography)

  • use atom with unstable nucleus which decays, producing positrons
  • detected by a ring of detectors
  • this goes into a coincidence processing unit, producing an image of where activity is in the brain - using computer algorithms

study:

  • injected glucose (which was associated with fluorine - radioactive source)
  • therefore found which brain areas were active on the scan
  • kids did a continuous performance task repetitively

results:

anterior and posterior frontal brain regions = had significantly different normalized rates of glucose metabolism in patients (teenagers with ADHD) compared with controls

30
Q

3 forms of evidence for dopamine theory of ADHD

A

evidence:

medication
imaging
reward/reinforcement

31
Q

how many prescriptions for methylphenidate are written per year in the UK

A

922,200 prescriptions (might be more now)

32
Q

evidence for dopamine theory - DA increasing drugs

A

test of DA levels in ADHD

Micro-dialysis

A small, semi-permeable probe is inserted into a specific brain site

Fluid is perfused through the probe and chemicals in the extracellular fluid diffuse across the membrane and are collected

Samples are then analysed using chromatography methods (e.g. HPLC)

Dopamine levels in the striatum after i.p. D-Amphetamine or methylphenidate = a lot higher

33
Q

ADHD and increased dopamine reuptake

A

as the drugs used raise dopamine - have low DA in the brain

could be explained by reuptake being too high

SPECT scans used - single photon emission tomography (similar to PET) - use atoms which produce gamma radiation as it decays - less precise than PET as one atom is used not 2 - lower resolution (about 1cm - PET is about 0.5cm) - camera that moves rather than in a ring

IPT used - binds tightly to dopamine transporter - attached to a gamma radiation source

showed much greater radiation in drug-naive children with ADHD (never had ADHD med) vs a control

= more DA transporters in ADHD in forebrain

particularly in basal ganglia - big part of DA system

34
Q

ADHD, DA, and changes in response to reward
rat study
children reinforcement study

A

study with food and sex in rats:

  • rats given food = increase in DA
  • rats increase in DA with sex - knowing a female is there causes increase - big spike when they see them

Douglas and Parry (1983)
disruption of learning by non-contingent reinforcement

method:

  • 66 elementary school children (mean age around 9.5 years old)
  • 33 with ADHD, 33 without
  • had to release a response key when a stimulus light came on (reaction time task)
    3 conditions:
  • rewarded on every trial when they got faster (continuous)
  • rewarded on every other trial when they got faster (partial)
  • rewarded randomly (non-contingent)

Reward = “very good”, “excellent” or “very fast”

results:

  • control: faster reaction time at reward than baseline and extinction in all conditions
  • ADHD: same pattern as control in continuous and partial condition
  • ADHD in non-contingent condition: much slower reaction time at reward than baseline or extinction

conclusion:
non-contingent reinforcement schedule resulted in slower mean reaction times in the ADHD sample - also delay aversion