Addiction Flashcards
What are addiction disorders/dependency syndromes?
- Addiction disorders/dependence syndromes are a cluster of physiological, behavioural, and cognitive phenomena
- Characterised by use of psychoactive drugs, alcohol, or tobacco
- Takes higher priority above other behaviours of previously greater value (WHO, 1964)
- Significantly increases risk of physical and mental health comorbidities and suicide
Describe the aetiology of substance dependence from a psychological aspect
- Relates to classical conditioning and memory
- Described as a learnt behaviour originating from the memory of an event that is often highly emotional and troubling (such as stress or bereavement) (Prados, 2018)
- Maladaptive behaviours develop to avoid the fear and anxiety when retrieving these memories
- Creates a rewarding effect that perpetuates them
Outline some of the diagnostic criteria (ICD-10, 1992) for dependence syndrome
- Strong desire/compulsion to take the substance
- Difficulties in controlling substance-taking behaviour
- Withdrawal symptoms
- Neglect of other alternative activities
- Persistent use despite evident harm
- Tolerance
Using the example of smoking, describe how addiction learning occurs
- Using example of tobacco dependence originating from work stress
- Cigarette smoking is the unconditioned stimulus (US)
- Stress relief due to nicotine as the unconditioned response (UR)
- Over repeated exposure to smoking whilst on break, the smoking becomes associated with the break via classical conditioning
- Break is now a conditioned stimulus (CS)
- Overtime it becomes sufficient to generate a conditioned response (CR) of cravings or withdrawal, in the absence of smoking (US)
Discuss how the conditioned response (CR) develops
- CR is produces as a consequence of psychological acquired tolerance
- With successive exposure to a substance, the body pre-emptively counteracts (CR) the unconditioned response
- In an attempt to maintain homeostasis when the substance is taken
- This has been demonstrated in animal models (Lubkov & Zilove, 1937; Siegel, 1975)
- If no substance-taking occurs, this CR is not corrected
- Resulting in the body generating drug-seeking behaviours
What is a craving? Discuss how they explain a number of symptoms of addiction
- Craving is the memory of the positively rewarding effects of a substance (Wise, 1998), created in the first instance of substance taking
- One of the most frequent causes of relapse
- Emotional arousal plays an important role in memory retrieval
- Emotional congruence is the tendency to recall memories that share the current experienced affect
- High emotionally arousing memory are recalled more easily and vivdly (Lane et al, 2015)
- Combined, this creates an emotional bias within memory
- The often-traumatic circumstances in which substance-taking begins, means that cravings are especially prone to recollection, with neutral or negative aspects of memory being forgotten
- Potency of cravings helps to explain why compulsion, loss of control, persistent use, and neglect in other areas occurs
Outline the role conditioning plays in substance dependence
- Substance dependence results from the creation and reinforcement of drug-seeking behaviours due to a combination of classical conditioning (described above) and operant conditioning
- Succumbing to cravings (CR) is postively reinforced with stress relief (UR) and alleviation of withdrawal
- Negatively reinforced as this prevents withdrawal-like symptoms
- Abstinence is punished with withdrawal-like symptoms (CR) and loss of desired stress relief (UR)
- Cravings are one of the most frequent causes of relapse
Discuss cue-exposure therapy
- Novel approach to treating dependence syndrome
- Based on theory of memory extinction
- Previous views stated that extinction caused deletion of original conditioning; more recent animal studies suggest it creates a new association of CR to no-reward, which overrides the original conditioning (Conklin & Tiffany, 2002)
- Key difference: original association is maintained in the latter
- New association results in a diminished impact and recollection of craving, subsequently reducing compulsions
Discuss the evidence of effect for cue-exposure therapy
- Although theoretically promising, a review of 18 studies with meta-analysis of 9 failed to show a significant overall effect size for cue-exposure treatments (Conklin & Tiffany, 2002)
- Interestly, this finding was not considered surprising; practitioners of cue-exposure therapy note there has been little empirical evidence for its effectiveness
Outline the barriers to practical use of cue-exposure therapy
- A key underlying difficulty is the retention and recollection of the original conditioning
- Renewal effect is one example of problematic recollection
- Reinstatement
Describe the renewal effect
- The renewal effect is one example of problematic recollection
- The difference in context between the original conditioning and that of cue-exposure therapy provides two distinct pathways following re-exposure to a cue
- Context A: smoking and stress relief in workplace
- Context B: cue-exposure therapy in clinical setting
- This creates instances where the new learnt association that “cures their addicition” is only seen in Context B
- Upon return to context A, more likely to recall original cravings and relapse
- Additionally, introduction to a new context C also results in relapse (Conklin & Tiffany, 2002)
- Bouton (1994) summarises that conditioning is generalisable, but extinction appear to be largely-context dependent
Suggest how cue-exposure therapy can be improved to overcome the renewal effect
- Provide cue-exposure therapy across multiple contexts to improve its generalisability
- This is supported by animal studies such as Gunther et al, 1998
- There have been suggests that the number of contexts for therapy must exceed the number of addiciton contexts (Chelonis et al, 1999)
- However, this may be impossible in addictions such as tobacco dependence
- Further research is required to determine the minimum necessary number of contexts (Conklin & Tiffany, 2002)
Describe the reinstatement effect
- Reinstatement effect is a similar problem as the renewal effect
- Responses to a previously extinguished CS reappear upon exposure to a US (Conklin & Tiffany, 2002)
- This is largely context dependent
- Demonstrated in animal models (de Wit & Stewart, 1981)
- Particularly troubling for widely available and socially acceptable substances (alcohol and tobacco) as it is impossible to completely avoid exposure (for example, second hand smoking or lapses)
Discuss improvements to cue-exposure therapy to overcome reinstatement
- Research has shown that initial lapses do not immediately cause re-addiction (Monti et al, 1993)
- Attenuation may be achieved by exposure to context alone after a lapse without providing the reward once again
- This minimises the likelihood of continued use after the lapse
- Those able to cope and return to abstinence may become less prone to future reinstatement (Conklin & Tiffany, 2002)
Discuss the potential for combination therapy in addiction treatment
- Perhaps the way to improve cue-exposure therapy is through utilisation as part of combined pyschotherapy
- It has been suggested the duration of exposure to a conditioned stimulus determines if extinction occurs
- Prolonged or repeated exposure activates extinction learning
- Brief exposure leads to reconsolidation of memory (Torregrossa & Taylor, 2012)
- Reconsolidation therapy aims to alter the original memory/conditioning behind addiction
- Through interference with a memory’s labile nature in the early periods of memory creation (Lane et al, 2015)
- Unlike, cue-exposure therapy, there is significant empirical evidence in animals and humans for the use of propranolol to trigger memory alteration by reconsolidation (Nadel et al, 2000; Xue et al, 2017)
- Applauded for relevance to PTSD (Kimbrel et al, 2015) which shares a common pathway with addiciton stemming from a single traumatic event