Action Theories: Max Weber - social action theory Flashcards
What two approaches does Weber see as necessary for a full understanding of human behaviour?
- structural approaches
- action approaches
What two levels does Weber argue that an adequate sociological explanation involves? Explain them
- level of cause (explaining the objective structural factors that shape people’s behaviour)
- level of meaning (understanding the subjective meanings that individuals attach to their actions)
What are the four types of actions that Weber has classified, based on their meaning for the actor?
- instrumentally rational action
- value-rational action
- traditional action
- affectual action
Give an example of an instrumentally rational action
- a capitalist calculating that the most efficient way of maximising profit is to pay low wages
What does an instrumentally rational action disregard? Give an example
- if the goal itself is actually desirable eg. the goal could be genocide, it is about the most efficient way of reaching that goal
Give an example of a value-rational action
- believer worshipping their god to get to heaven
What is the distinct difference between instrumentally rational action and value-rational action? Show how
- there is no way of measuring whether the means of achieving the goal are effective
- eg. the believer has no way of knowing if the ritual will gain him salvation
What doesn’t Weber see traditional action as rational?
- no conscious thought or choice has gone into it
If there is no conscious thought or choice behind a traditional action, why does the actor do it?
- ‘we have always done it’
Give an example of an affectual action
- weeping in grief, violence sparked by anger
Where does Weber see affectual action as most important?
- religious and political movements with charismatic leaders who attract a following based on emotional appeal
How does Schutz argue that Weber’s view of action is too individualistic and cannot explain the shared nature of meanings?
- Weber doesn’t explain how everyone present comes to give certain gestures the same meaning
How is Weber’s typology of action difficult to apply?
- certain actions could be considered traditional action or instrumentally rational action
- eg. tribes exchanging ritual gifts
How could Weber’s use of verstehen be questioned?
- can never be sure we have truly understood the other person’s motives