act 2 : scene 2 Flashcards
who speaks the most? why? what does this suggest about that character and their relationship with the other characters in the extract?
Very even between Isabella and Angelo. Shows the power dynamic becoming more even as opposed to Angelo having all of the power. Isabella does overall have more power/lines, but Angelo has a soliloquy
is the extract in blank verse or rhyming couplets or prose? is this consistent throughout? if not, where does it change and why?
Blank verse throughout
are imperatives used?
Imperatives are used
word placement
‘Bribe’ meant to be innocent but sounds seductive
repetition of a word/phrase - is the repetition from the same character or does one character repeat another character’s words?
not really…
how does the extract connect to the themes of the play? - disguise, power, religion, appearance/reality etc.
power and religion
sentence length
varies massively as power dynamic changes
asides
used throughout
contrasts/opposites
goes against Bible. old Testament and New Testament. Disagreements throughout
is there a soliloquy?
Yes. Angelo has one at the end when processing feelings towards Isabella
what is the tone of the extract? does the tone change? if so, what words indicate the change?
Serious tone throughout as it is a debate
imagery - simile, metaphor, personification
like God
sibilance, alliteration
come back to
what is happening in the scene:
- Encouraged by Lucio, Isabella visits Angelo to plead for Claudio’s life
- Angelo will not yield and asserts the justice of his sentence
- Angelo wavers and tells her to return the next day
- Angelo reflects on how she has aroused his lust
key point of this scene: 1
One of the most important scenes in the play
key point of this scene: 2
The Provost sets the tone of this head-to-head encounter when he repeats the humanitarian argument and that no man should die for it. Angelo is certain that he will not regret his ‘judgment’ and does not expect to repent at leisure or to suffer remorse
key point of this scene: 3
Shakespeare invests Angelo with psychological realism and the balanced mean must have a measure of each human quality in his soul
key point of this scene: 4
Shakespeare, in G. Wilson Knight’s words show that Angelo is “the symbol of a fake intellectualism ethic divorced from the deeper springs of the human instinct.” Knight means that Angelo’s “spotless reputation” intimidated those around him is the “reason abstracted from emotion” and therefore, Angelo refuses to admit that passion (as opposed to compassion) has a place in the human scheme of things
key point of this scene: 5
Isabella also agrees that fornication is a capital offence and can only be pardoned under extenuating circumstances. Reason must be weighed against emotion. Against Isabella’s natural instinct, there must be measure for measure
key point of this scene: 6
Isabella originally argues that Angelo should condemn the sin rather than the sinner. With the Doctrine of Original Sin, Isabella should know that the function of God’s Deputy on Earth can only be to punish those who commit sins