ACC AHA part 1 Flashcards
2017 Recomendation of severe secondary vs primairy MR -
- ERO
- Regurgitant volume
Some data has suggested that with severe secondary MR, a smaller ERO should be used
(? weakend ventricle, correlates with regurg volume)
Recs unchanged:
ERO: >0.4cm2 (more specific), ERO 0.2cm2 (more sensitive)
Regurg volume > 60ml
reccomendataion for patient with :
Decreased exercise tolerance
Exertional dyspnea
ERO = 0.5cm2
LVEF > 30
1B evidence for Surgery
Standing 2014 guideline -
Mitral valve surgery is recommended for symptomatic
patients with chronic severe primary MR (stage D) and
LVEF greater than 30%
reccomendation for patient with:
no symptoms
Chronic severe MR
LVEF 45%
LVESD 40mm
1B recomendation is surgery.
The 2014 recs stand:
Mitral valve surgery is recommended for asymptomatic
patients with chronic severe primary MR and LV dysfunction
(LVEF 30% to 60% and/or left ventricular end-systolic
diameter [LVESD] ‡40 mm,
Recomendation for a patient with:
no symptoms
Chronic severe primairy MR
LVEF: 65%
LVESD 35mm
Surgery:
- if the liklihood of a successful repair is >95% and expected mortality is <1% at a heart valve center of excellece:
IIa B recomendation is for mitral valve repair
From a Mitral data perspective, what does an LVEF of 60% and a LVESD > 40 indicate
The presence of systolic LV dysfunction
Mitral regurgitation:
Other than LVEF (<60) and LVESD > 40mm, what data can push a patient with primairy MR to surgery ?
- New onset atrial fibrillation
- Pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 50mmHg
IIa B recomendation:
Mitral valve repair is reasonable for asymptomatic patients
with chronic severe nonrheumatic primary MR (stage C1) and preserved LV function (LVEF >60% and LVESD <40 mm) in whom there is a high likelihood of a successful and durable repair with 1) new onset of AF or 2) resting pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic arterial pressure >50 mm Hg
Anticoagulation for patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation
Anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonist
Reccomendatioins for antibotic prophylaxis with dental procedures IE prophylaxis ?
Prophylaxis against IE is reasonable before dental procedures that involve manipulation of gingival tissue, manipulation of the periapical region of teeth, or
perforation of the oral mucosa in patients with the
following (13,15,23–29):
- Prosthetic cardiac valves, including transcatheterimplanted
prostheses and homografts.
- Prosthetic material used for cardiac valve repair,
such as annuloplasty rings and chords.
- Previous IE.
- Unrepaired cyanotic congenital heart disease or
repaired congenital heart disease, with residual
shunts or valvular regurgitation at the site of or
adjacent to the site of a prosthetic patch or
prosthetic device.
- Cardiac transplant with valve regurgitation due to a
structurally abnormal valve.
DOAC
DOAC= Direct oral anticoagulants-
Apixaban (Eliquis®)
Dabigatran (Pradaxa®)
Rivaroxaban (Xarelto®)
class IA reccomendations for TAVR
Class IA Recs
TAVR is recommended for symptomatic patients with severe AS (Stage D) and a prohibitive risk for surgical AVR who have a predicted post-TAVR survival greaterthan 12 months
Valve hemodynamic criteria for Symptomatic severe high-gradient AS?
Valve hemodynamic criteria for Symptomatic severe high-gradient AS
- valve hemodynamics:
- aortic velocity 4.0 m/s or higher,
- corresponding to a mean trans-aortic gradient of 40 mm Hg or higher.
- valve area is <1.0 cm2 with an indexed aortic valve area of < 0.6 cm2/m2
- but it may be larger, with mixed stenosis and regurgitation.
Valve hemodynamic criteria for Symptomatic severe high-gradient AS
valve hemodynamics:
velocity?
Valve hemodynamic criteria for Symptomatic severe high-gradient AS
valve hemodynamics:
aortic velocity 4.0 m/s or higher
Valve hemodynamic criteria for Symptomatic severe high-gradient AS
valve hemodynamics:
mean transaortic gradient:
40 mm Hg or higher.
Valve hemodynamic criteria for Symptomatic severe high-gradient AS
valve hemodynamics:
valve area: .
- valve area is <1.0 cm2
- indexed aortic valve area of < 0.6 cm2/m2
but it may be larger, with mixed stenosis and regurgitation.
TAVI
Severe symptomatic low-flow low-gradient With low EF:
TAVI
Severe symptomatic low-flow low-gradient With low EF:
- severe AS with a low left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (<50%)
- defined by a severely calcified valve with:
- reduced systolic opening and an aortic valve area <1.0 cm2.
- Aortic velocity is ≤4.0 m/s at rest but increases ≥4.0 m/s on low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography.
TAVI
Severe symptomatic low-flow low-gradient severe AS with a normal LVEF
ECHO CRITERIA
Severe symptomatic low-flow low-gradient severe AS with a normal LVEF
- aortic valve area <1.0 cm2 with a
- aortic velocity <4.0 m/s
- mean gradient <40 mm Hg.
- indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm2/m2
- stroke volume index <35 ml/m2
TAVI
Patient specific factors important to evaluating TAVI candidacy
Per 2014 Guidelines:
integrated assessment combining
- the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Predicted Risk of Mortality score
- the STS score: <4% (low risk),
- 4% to 8% (intermediate risk),
- >8% (high risk).
- frailty
- main organ system dysfunction
TAVI Evaluation
Major CV comorbidities assessed?
Major CV Comorbidities assessed:
- Coronary artery disease
- LV systolic dysfunction
- Concurrent valve disease (MR/MS)
- Pulmonary hypertension
- Aortic disease (porcelain aorta)
- Peripheral Vascular disease
- Hostile chest / prohibitive previous open heart surgery
TAVI Evaluation
Major non-CV comorbidities
- Malignancy (remote, active, impact on life expectancy)
- GI and liver Disease
- GIB, IBD, Cirrhosis,
- GFR < 30cc/min/1.73m2
- HD
- O2 requirement
- FEV1 < 50% predicted
- DLCO < 50% predicted
- Neurologic disorders
- Movement disorders, dementia
TGA
what are the two major anatomic variants?
And their relative frequency
- Two major subdivisions
- “Simple TGA” – 60- 70%
- “VSD” 30-50%
TGA
frequency of VSD + Pulmonary stenosis
- VSD and pulmonary stenosis : 10%
TGA
frequency of a subaortic conus
Subaortic conus : 90%
TGA
frequency of PFO
PFO in nearly all
TGA
if left uncorrected, when does the LV thickness begin to decrease
1 month
TGA
what form of TGA presents with severe cyanosis after birth?
TGA + IVS
Cyanosis depends on the level of mixing –
no mixing
TGA
What form presents with mild cyanosis and heart failrue in the first month ?
Why?
TGA with a large PDA/VSD (and no LVOTO)
Cyanosis depends on mixing - large PDA or VSD permit mixing
LVTOTO would prevent the ammount of pulmonary over flow (pulmonary vascular bed has low resistance)
TGA Presentation of:
TGA / Large VSD / LVOTO?
Why?
severe cyanosis without heart failure
Cyanosis depends on the mixing
LVOTO controlls the over circulation through the pulmonary bed, which is controlled by the LVOTO
TGA Presentation of:
TGA / large VSD or PDA / NO LVOTO ?
Why?
Heart failure within the first month, mild cyanosis
cyanosis depends on mixing - provided by VSD/PDA
no LVOTO to inhibit the inhibit the overcirculation through the vascular bed.
TGA Presentation of:
TGA with IVS
Why?
Cyanosis
No mixing
TGA is what % of all CHD ?
7.8%
Dabigatran - commercial name
DOAC= Direct oral anticoagulants-
Apixaban (Eliquis®)
Dabigatran (Pradaxa®)
Rivaroxaban (Xarelto®)
What is the level of evidence for:
Mitral valve surgery is recommended for symptomatic patients with chronic severe primary MR (stage D) and LVEF greater than 30%
IB
what is the level of evidence for:
Mitral valve surgery is recommended for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe primary MR and LV dysfunction (LVEF 30% to 60% and/or left ventricular end-systolic diameter [LVESD] ≥40 mm, stage C2
IB
what is the level of evidence for
Mitral valve repair is recommended in preference to MVR when surgical treatment is indicated for patients with chronic severe primary MR limited to the posterior leaflet
?
IB
What is the level of evidence
Mitral valve repair is recommended in preference to MVR when surgical treatment is indicated for patients with chronic severe primary MR involving the anterior leaflet or both leaflets when a successful and durable repair can be accomplished (84,89,95,100–104).
IB
Class IB recomendations for MR
how many are there?
what are they?
There are 5 class IB recs
- Mitral valve surgery is recommended for symptomatic patients with chronic severe primary MR (stage D) and LVEF greater than 30%
- Mitral valve surgery is recommended for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe primary MR and LV dysfunction (LVEF 30% to 60% and/or left ventricular end-systolic diameter [LVESD] > 40 mm,
- Mitral valve repair is recommended in preference to MVR when surgical treatment is indicated for patients with chronic severe primary MR limited to the posterior leaflet
- Mitral valve repair is recommended in preference to MVR when surgical treatment is indicated for patients with chronic severe primary MR involving the anterior leaflet or both leaflets when a successful and durable repair can be accomplished
- Concomitant mitral valve repair or MVR is indicated in patients with chronic severe primary MR undergoing cardiac surgery for other indications (105).
What is the level of reccomendations for:
Mitral valve repair is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe nonrheumatic primary MR (stage C1) and preserved LV function (LVEF >60% and LVESD <40 mm) in whom there is a high likelihood of a successful and durable repair with 1) new onset of AF or 2) resting pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic arterial pressure >50mm Hg) ?
IIaB