A3: Theories Of Stress, Behavioural Addiction And Physiological Addiction Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the health belief model (HBM)?

A

Predicts the likelihood of behaviour change. Key factors are perceived seriousness, perceived susceptibility, cost-benefit analysis, demographic variables, cues to action and self-efficacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the three steps of the health belief model?

A

Perceived seriousness
Perceived susceptibility
Cost-benefit analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is perceived seriousness?

A

How harmful will the consequences be if I do not change my health?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is perceived susceptibility?

A

How personally and realistically vulnerable am I to an illness/disease?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is cost-benefit analysis?

A

An individual weighs up the balance between the perceived benefits of changing behaviour and the perceived barriers (obstacles to change).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the modifying factors of the HBM?

A

Demographic variables
Cues to action
Self-efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are demographic variables?

A

The characteristics of a population and an individual,such as age, sex, education level, income level, marital status, occupation, religion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are cues to action?

A

Internal: e.g. experience of symptoms such as pain
External: e.g. media campaigns, awareness of other people with the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is self-efficacy in relation to the HBM?

A

Does the individual believe they have the ability to successfully change their health?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HBM: Strength: Williamson and Wardle (2002)

A

Used the HBM to devise a programme to increase the number of people seeking screening for bowel and colon cancers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

HBM: Strength: Strong Credibility

A

Developed by heath researchers who worked directly with people who wanted to change their health-related behaviours so they based the model on real life experiences of health problems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

HBM: Weakness: Zimmerman and Vernberg (1994)

A

Argued that once self-efficacy and demographic factors (and other variables) are added, the HBM becomes a different model altogether.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

HBM: Weakness: How rational are we?

A

Rational decisions on health related behaviours aren’t always made and this model assumes they are but it is unclear whether we make health-related decisions based on logic, emotion, habit or all three.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Locus of control: Rotter (1966)

A

Proposed that some people believe the things that happen to them are likely under their control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Internal locus of control

A

Internals believe they are in control of their own behaviour and attribute their successes/failures to themselves. Positive health related changes are more likely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

External locus of control

A

Externals do not feel in control and attribute their own successes/failures to luck, circumstance or other people. They feel hopeless to change their health.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

LoC: Strength: Avtgis (1998)

A

Found that high externals were more persuadable and conformist than high internals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

LoC: Strength: Gale et al. (2008)

A

Measured the LoC of 7551 children aged 10 and found by the time they were 30, internals were less likely than externals to be obese or experience psychological stress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

LoC: Weakness: Rotter (1982)

A

Later pointed out LoC is only relevant in novel situations as it has little effect on our behaviour in familiar situations where previous experience is always more important.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

LoC: Weakness: Krause (1986)

A

Found that extreme internals respond to unavailable events by becoming stressed, just as externals do (but for different reasons) so bring internal doesn’t automatically protect you from stress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is theory of planed behaviour?

A

Changes in behaviour can be predicted from our intention to change, which in turn is the outcome of personal attitudes towards the behaviour in question, our beliefs about what others think and our perceived ability to control our behaviour.

22
Q

What are personal attitudes?

A

The balance of a person’s favourable and unfavourable attitudes about their behaviour. There are positive attitudes and negative attitudes.

23
Q

What are positive and negative attitudes?

A

Positive: e.g. “I enjoy smoking” less likely to make health-related behavioural changes
Negative: e.g. “My addiction is ruining my life” More likely to change behaviour

24
Q

What are subjective norms?

A

If we feel our friends and family disapprove of our health we are more likely to change. If they approve of our health we are less likely to change.

25
Q

What is perceived behavioural control?

A

A person who feels in control of their health = more likely to make health-related behavioural changes and vice versa.

26
Q

TPB: Strength: Hagger et al. (2011)

A

Found that personal attitudes, subjective norms and pbc all predicted an intention to limit drinking to guideline number of units and actual behaviour at one month and three month follow ups.

27
Q

TBC: Strength: Louis et al. (2009)

A

Found that personal attitudes towards eating predicted intention to eat healthily but subjective norms did not.

28
Q

TBC: Weakness: Miller and Howell (2005)

A

Found that they could not predict the reduction of actual gambling behaviour from intentions to give up in teenagers.

29
Q

TBC: Weakness: McEachan et al. (2011)

A

Found that the strength of correlation between intentions and actual behaviour was stronger when the two took place in close time proximity.

30
Q

What is self-efficacy theory?

A

Refers to the belief we have in our ability to carry out an action/task. Bandura: suggested it is central to our motivation to change behaviour.

31
Q

People with high self efficacy?

A

Believe that they will be successful and therefore are more strongly motivated to tackle difficult tasks.

32
Q

People with low self efficacy?

A

Believe they will fail and therefore avoid such challenges.

33
Q

1: Mastery Experiences?

A

An individual needs to be provided with opportunities to perform a health-related task successfully. The experience must challenge the person but not overwhelm them.

34
Q

2: Vicarious reinforcement

A

Show the individual someone with whom they identify succeeding at changing their health to promote the belief that ‘if they can do it, so can I’

35
Q

3: Social persuasion

A

Encouragement and discouragement from others can have a profound impact on our self-efficacy. E.g. “I believe you can do this” must be from a credible source.

36
Q

4: Emotional states

A

Negative: (stress, anxiety, fear) reduce self-efficacy.
Positive: (relaxation) increases self-efficacy.

37
Q

S-e: strength: Strecher et al.

A

Found strong relationships between self-efficacy beliefs and behaviour change in the areas of weight control, contraception use, exercise etc.

38
Q

S-e: strength: Several strategies/interventions produce behaviour change.

A

For example, the theory suggests breaking down mastery experiences and using relaxation training to reduce anxiety to improve self-efficacy and making change more likely.

39
Q

S-e: Weakness: Eastman and Marzillier

A

Argue that the questionnaires used to measure self-efficacy (incl Bandura’s own) are unclear, open to interpretation and in many cases, not measuring self-efficacy at all.

40
Q

S-e: Vancouver et al.

A

Found that high self-efficacy may lead to overconfidence, which means the individual makes less effort the next time they perform the task.

41
Q

What is the transtheoretical model?

A

Explains the stages people go through to change their behaviour. It identifies stages of change, from not considering it at all to making permanent changes. The stages are not necessarily followed in a linear order.

42
Q

Precontemplation

A

Not thinking about changing their health in the next six months.

43
Q

Two reasons for precontemplation?

A

Denial: the person has never considered changing because they don’t believe they have a problem
Demotivation: person has tried many times to tackle addiction, without success and is now demoralised and doesn’t intend to try again.

44
Q

Contemplation

A

Considering changing their health in the next six months but haven’t committed to it (ambivalence).

45
Q

Preparation

A

The individual has decided the benefits outweigh the costs and they will change their behaviour in the next month.

46
Q

Action

A

The individual has done something to change their health within the last six months.

47
Q

Maintenance

A

The person has maintained health-related behavioural changes for more than 6 months and is focusing on on preventing relapse by avoiding cues.

48
Q

TM: Weakness: Contradictory research evidence

A

West concluded ‘…the problems with the model are so serious…it should be discarded’

49
Q

TM: Weakness: Arbitrary nature of the stages

A

Sutton points out that if an individual plans to stop smoking in 30 days then they are in the preparation stage, but if they plan to give up in 31 days, they are in the contemplation stage.

50
Q

TM: Strength: Dynamic nature of behaviour

A

Dynamic process: For example, the model emphasises the importance of time, viewing overcoming an addiction a continuing process and proposing that behavioural changes vary in duration for each person and that the stages are recycled backwards and forwards to different degrees.

51
Q

TM: Strength: Attitude to relapse

A

For example, the model doesn’t view relapse as failure, but as an inevitable part of the untidy, non-linear dynamic process of behaviour change.