9. Visual Attention Flashcards
Attention
mental processes for seeking out and focusing on relevant (visual) stimuli, which are consequently processed to a greater extent (at the expense of other stimuli)
The amount of information processed is limited because out sensory and motor systems are limited
Visual scenes are scanned to take in different parts; measured with camera-based eye-trackers, our saccades and fixations
sensory systems are limited
Limited Sensory Range:
Each sensory system is tuned to a specific range of stimuli. For example, the human eye can only detect light within the visible spectrum (~400-700 nm) We cannot perceive ultraviolet or infrared light
Resolution and Acuity:
Sensory acuity varies across modalities. In vision, for instance, our acuity is highest in the fovea (central vision) but decreases significantly in the periphery
Sensory Adaptation:
Our sensory systems adapt to constant stimuli, reducing responsiveness over time. For example, we become less sensitive to continuous smells or sounds, which can limit the detection of persistent environmental changes.
e.g., visual fixations, size of foveal gaze
motor systems are limited
Motor Precision:
While we can execute many complex movements, motor precision is limited by factors such as muscle coordination and neural control. Fine motor skills (like threading a needle) require precise control, which is not always possible in all parts of the body (e.g., the legs).
Reaction Time:
There is a delay between sensory input, decision-making, and motor output. Our reaction time can be slowed by the complexity of a task or age-related factors, limiting how quickly we can respond to fast-moving stimuli.
fatigue:
Muscles and neural circuits controlling movement experience fatigue over time, reducing strength, accuracy, and endurance
e.g., movements planned/words spoken sequentially
saccades
are rapid, jerky eye movements that shift the gaze from one point to another. They allow the eyes to quickly reposition to focus on different objects or areas in the visual field. Saccades occur during tasks like reading or scanning a scene.
- saccadic suppression: attenuation in some spatial frequencies during saccade
▸ neither motion of the eye/motion blur nor gap in perception is detected
▸ begins before eye movement (thus, is not an optical effect)
fixations
moments when the eyes are relatively still and focused on a particular point. During a fixation, visual information is processed, allowing us to gather detailed information about the object or area we’re looking at.
- about 3 fixations/second
- fixation locations may be determined by:
▸ visual salience: colour, contrast, orientation (bottom-up process)
▸ picture meaning/observer knowledge: what do you expect to see? (top-down process)
▸ task demands: what are you being asked to do?
overt attention
directing foveal gaze (and attention) to a stimulus
covert attention
directing attention to a stimulus in peripheral vision
- attention can be used to select stimuli independent of fixation
Helmholtz and Covert attention
- put matrix of letters on wall, with fixation cross in the centre
- fixated on cross and turned lights off
- directed his attention (not his eyes) to a certain location, then briefly illuminated room with a spark
- could perceive letters in attended region, but not in other regions
- attention can be used to select stimuli independent of fixation
selective attention task
requires responding to a stimulus while ignoring others
e.g., reading a textbook while trying to ignore interruptions
divided attention task
requires attending to two or more simultaneous stimuli
e.g., driving, drinking a coffee, and talking on cell phone at the same time
what do videogames teach us about attention?
Green and Bavelier (2003):
- found that action video game players consistently performed better on tests of attention and information processing
- attention is a skill that can be honed with practice
action video games enhance attentional processing?
- had non-gamers play Medal of Honor: Allied Assault™ game 1 hour/day for 10 days: visual attention skills improve
- less improvement in control group who played tetris™
components of attention
Michael Posner, Nissen, & Ogden (1978):
- attention viewed as a spotlight: can focus on certain locations
- disengaging attention from current location
- moving attention to new location
- engaging attention in new location
precueing (or Posner spatial cueing) task
a cognitive experiment designed to study attention and how it influences the processing of visual information. In the task, participants focus on a central point on a screen and are briefly shown a cue (an arrow or flash) that suggests where a target will likely appear (left or right side). After the cue, the target appears, and the participant responds as quickly as possible.
There are 3 types of conditions:
-neutral
-Valid cues: Correctly predict the target’s location.
-Invalid cues: Direct attention to the wrong location.
Findings:
Faster reaction times occur with valid cues because attention is already directed to the correct location.
Slower reaction times occur with invalid cues due to the need to shift attention away from the cued location.
is attention a top-down or bottom-up process?
attention is not only exogenous or “stimulus-driven” (bottom-up), but also endogenous or “goal-directed” (top-down)
Balint’s syndrome
patients experience more illusory conjunctions; deficit in locating targets in conjunction search
Simultanagnosia: Inability to perceive multiple objects at once, meaning the person can only focus on one object in their visual field at a time.
- supports the idea that attention can be object-based
- syndrome may be due to inability to shift attention among objects
Unilateral neglect (a.k.a. hemispatial neglect)
- deficit in awareness of items on one side of space, due to brain damage
- damage results in neglect of objects (or parts of objects) in the contralesional visual field
e.g., may eat food from just one side of a plate, shave/make-up one side of face, fail to dress one half of their body, or copy only half of a drawing:
- patients often unaware of this deficit
- typically due to damage in right posterior parietal cortex, critical to attention and selection
- explanations:
- problem in disengaging attention from ipsilateral (same) side; cueing (directing attention) helped reduce spatial biases
- disruption of balance between hemispheres in directing attention; more stimuli on ipsilateral side hampers attention to contralateral (opposite side) items:
egocentric neglect
unaware of one side of space:
▸ 11 people overlooked complete apples on the left side of the page; 2 people missed complete apples on the right side
▸ brain damage was clustered in right anterior cortical regions, and subcortical structures
- brain damage to certain right parietal regions was common to both groups
allocentric neglect
unaware of one side of objects:
▸ 8 people crossed out apples with gaps on their left side; 2 people crossed out apples with gaps on their right side
▸ brain damage was in right posterior cortical regions
- brain damage to certain right parietal regions was common to both groups
is attention location based or object based?
- attention may be either location-based or object-based
- different parts of the brain process different kinds of attention
- damage to location-based system produces egocentric neglect, damage to object-based system results in allocentric neglect
- location-based processing is better suited to static scenes, whereas object-based processing works well for following a moving object in dynamic scenes
inattentional blindness
stimulus that is presented, but is not attended, is not perceived (a.k.a. “looked-but-didn’t-see” problem)
there is no conscious perception of the visual world without attention to it
change blindness
an inability to detect changes in an object or a scene
Implications:
- not everything presented to our senses is processed
- attention is limited
- visual encoding must be selective or “sparse”
Levin & Simons (1997):
- observers told to “pay close attention” to a video of a conversation
- only 1 of 10 observers noticed any changes
Simons & Levin (1998): the door study
- only half of the observers noticed a change in the stranger
- changes may be local or global, fast or slow
- however, people do notice changed sex, race, or social group