9) Trial Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

trial by jury: rule

A

7th am:

1) “in suits at CL”
2) where value in controversy exceeds $20

note: congress could expand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

trial by jury: “in suits at CL” elements

A

1) nature of remedy

2) nature of claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

trial by jury: “in suits at CL”: nature of remedy

A

can have right to jury if MONETARY (not injunctive) relief is sought.

Even if there’s also claim for injunctive relief, jury right exists for any issue of fact underlying a damages claim (even if resolving that issue might support injunctive relief)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

trial by jury: “in suits at CL”: nature of the claim

A

type of claim that would have been actionable in 1791, OR can be fairly nalogized to claim that would have been actionable then

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

right to jury: who?

A

any party can demand jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

right to jury: how?

A

file + serve written jury demand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

right to jury: dl

A

must file jury demand no later than 14 days after last pleading (complaint/answer/reply) directed to the jury-eligible issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

right to jury: waive

A

if you don’t timely file/serve the written demand, forfeit right to jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

jury: how many ppl?

A

6-12

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

jury: selection: kinds of challenges

A

1) challenge for cause

2) peremptory challenge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

jury: selection: challenge for cause: rule

A

unfitness to serve (most common: confessed or likely bias).

unlimited number

must articulate nature of juror’s unfitness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

jury: selection: peremptory challenge: rule

A

each side gets 3

automatic dismissal, dnn articulate reason UNLESS

strikes give rise to inference of racial/gender discrim. Then, must give nondiscrim explanation for strike

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

jury instructions: timing to propose

A

any party can propose

no later than close of all evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

jury instructions: timing to object

A

any party can object

must do so before jury starts deliberating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

jury: what %? (+ exception)

A

must be unanimous

exception: parties stipulate otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

jury: types of verdicts

A

1) general verdict
2) special verdict
3) hybrid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

jury: verdicts: general verdict (def)

A

statement that P or D wins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

jury: verdicts: special verdict (def)

A

court asks j to answer specific fact qs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

jury: verdicts: hybrid (def)

A

court asks j for both general verdict and special

20
Q

jury: verdicts: hybrid: what if general and special conflict?

A

judge can:

1) order new trial or
2) send jury back to re-deliberate or
3) special verdict trumps

21
Q

bench trial

A

must include “special” findings of fact separate from conclusions of law (only at trials)

22
Q

partial judgment:

A

after party fully heard on an issue, court can determine not enough evidence ot prevail on particular claim, can enter judgment on just that claim

23
Q

mxn for judgment as matter of law: JML: who initiates

A

sua sponte or on mxn of party

can be by individual claim

24
Q

JML: rule

A

1) party against whom judgment is entered has been fully heard on an issue AND
2) party lacks sufficient evidnece to prevail on an issue nec to particular claim or defense

(like sj: assume credibility + dn weigh the evidence)

25
Q

post trial mxns: kinds

A

1) renewed mxn jml
2) mxn new trial
3) mxn relief from judgment

26
Q

post trial mxn: renewed mxn jml: rule

A

IF made unsuccessful mxn JML during trial

same standard as JML

27
Q

post trial mxn: joint mxns

A

ok jointly move for renewed JML + new trial

28
Q

post trial mxn: renewed mxn jml: dl

A

w/in 28 days of judgment

29
Q

post trial mxn: renewed mxn jml: dl: “judgment”

A

date of court judgment (might not be same as date of verdict)

30
Q

post trial mxn: renewed mxn jml: ways court could rule

A

1) allow verdict to stand
2) enter the opposite verdict
3) order new trial (even if no mxn new trial)

note: if grants renewed jml mxn, must also issue conditional ruling on mxn new trial

31
Q

post trial mxn: mxn new trial: grounds

A

1) against great weight of the evidence
2) excessive damages
3) procedural error or misconduct
4) newly discovered evidence

32
Q

post trial mxn: mxn new trial: grounds: against great weight of evidence: note

A

court CAN consider comparative volume, credibility of the evidence (unlike sj or jml)

33
Q

post trial mxn: mxn new trial: grounds: excessive damages: standard

A

“grossly excessive” or “shocks the conscience”

NOTE: no remedy if damages grossly INadequate

court can give P option of submitting to amt of damages it considers appropriate

34
Q

post trial mxn: mxn new trial: grounds: procedural error or misconduct: rule

A

IFF:

1) error or misconduct likely affected result of trial AND
2) party objected to error when had opportunity to do so

35
Q

post trial mxn: mxn new trial: grounds: procedural error or misconduct: exs

A
exclusion of evidence
jury instructions
communication btwn wits
ex parte com w judge
juror misconduct
36
Q

post trial mxn: mxn new trial: grounds: newly discovered evidence: rule

A

1) party discovers evidence after the verdict
2) that could not w reasonable diligence, have been discovered before verdict
3) is not solely for purposes of impeachment
4) and would likely change the result

37
Q

post trial mxn: mxn new trial: dl

A

must file w/in 28 days

38
Q

post trial mxn: mxn for relief from judgment: def

A

just asks the court to undo the judgment

39
Q

post trial mxn: mxn for relief from judgment: grounds: mnemonic

A
Make
Noise
For 
Very
Soft
Cats
40
Q

post trial mxn: mxn for relief from judgment: grounds

A

1) Mistake
2) Newly Discovered Evidence
3) Fraud
4) Void (judgment)
5) satisfied (j. has been)
6) Catch-All

41
Q

post trial mxn: mxn for relief from judgment: grounds: mistake: rule

A

Mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect

ex. defaults

42
Q

post trial mxn: mxn for relief from judgment: grounds: newly discovered evidence: rule

A

same standard as mxn new trial:

1) party discovers evidence after the verdict
2) that could not w reasonable diligence, have been discovered before verdict
3) is not solely for purposes of impeachment
4) and would likely change the result

43
Q

post trial mxn: mxn for relief from judgment: grounds: fraud: rule

A

fraud / misrep / misconduct by a party

ex: withholding evidence, bribing wits, false sts to court/parties

44
Q

post trial mxn: mxn for relief from judgment: grounds: judgment is void: rule

A

court lacked SMJ or PJ

45
Q

post trial mxn: mxn for relief from judgment: grounds: judgment has been satisfied: rule

A

party satisfied the judgment against it – discharged so no longer under supervision of the court

46
Q

post trial mxn: mxn for relief from judgment: grounds: catch-all: rule

A

CAN’T BE USED if one of the 5 options above is appropriate

47
Q

post trial mxn: mxn for relief from judgment: timing: rule

A

1) w/in reasonable time (always)

2) if based on first 3 grounds (mistake, new evidence, fraud) = w/in 1 year!!