9. Social developments to 1914 Flashcards
Developments in working and living conditions
Growth in Urban Population and Factories
- Factory workers rose from 2 million (1900) to six million (1913).
- Urban population surged from 7 million (1867) to 28 million (1917).
- By 1913, 6 million urban factory workers resided in major cities.
Developments in working and living conditions
Living conditions in cities
- Urban facilities couldn’t accommodate the growing population.
- Workers lived in overcrowded, unsanitary barrack-like conditions.
- St. Petersburg: 40% houses lacked water/sewage, leading to cholera outbreaks.
- High rents forced some to live rough or within factories.
Developments in working and living conditions
Challenges for workers
- Women earned less than half the average industrial wage.
- Wages lagged behind inflation rates.
- Working hours reduced to ten by 1914.
Developments in working and living conditions
Education
- Primary school provision increased by 85% by 1914; government supported universities.
- Education investment less than industry; 55% engaged in full-time education by 1914.
Developments in working and living conditions
Political discontent
- Urban discontent fueled political frustration, shifting strike motives.
- Repression of strikes led to violence; 1912 Lena Goldfields strike resulted in 270 deaths and 250 injuries due to workers demanding better wages and conditions.
DEVELOPMENTS IN WORKING AND LIVING CONDITIONS IN THE COUNTRYSIDE
Growing socio-economic disparities
- Widening wealth gap between the richest (kulaks) and poorest peasants.
- Harder lives for the poorest, leading some to become migrant laborers or move to Siberia (only 3.5 million of 97 million were able to).
- Government schemes were insufficient to alleviate pressure.
DEVELOPMENTS IN WORKING AND LIVING CONDITIONS IN THE COUNTRYSIDE
Varied living standards
- Diverse living standards across regions; Baltic and Western Siberia were more prosperous.
- Continued dominance of nobles in land ownership and outdated farming in the Russian heartland.
DEVELOPMENTS IN WORKING AND LIVING CONDITIONS IN THE COUNTRYSIDE
Social conditions and infrastucture
- Areas of Bolshevik support and counter-revolution tended to be prosperous in 1917.
- Former state peasants fared better post-emancipation with more land.
- Higher mortality rates in Russia compared to other European countries.
- Severe shortage of doctors and teachers; 60% illiteracy rate in 1914.
- Peasantry remained at the bottom of the social hierarchy.
DEVELOPMENTS IN WORKING AND LIVING CONDITIONS IN THE COUNTRYSIDE
Cultrual and social loyalties
Peasant loyalty remained tied to the Church and Tsar despite challenges.
Nobilty
Post-emancipation status of nobility
- Some nobles thrived post-emancipation through land arrangements, enterprise, military connections, and government roles.
- Between 1861-1905, around a third of nobles transferred land to townspeople/peasants; some struggled with debts and lacked modern money management skills.
Nobilty
Financial situation and political influence
- Absence of redistributive tax on the wealthy led to no significant change in their incomes, maintaining traditional lifestyles.
- Nicholas aimed to bolster noble influence in the zemstva and appointed them to provincial governorships.
Nobilty
Nobel assemblies and determination
- Each district had a noble assembly convening annually.
- In May 1906, the first meeting of the ‘united nobility’ occurred, determined to safeguard property rights and traditional interests amidst societal changes.
Nobilty
response to change
Some nobles adapted to changes, while most retained their previous wealth and status, displaying resilience and determination.
The middle class
Emergence of middle class
- Traditional societal structures faced challenge from the rising middle classes amid rapid economic changes.
- New business and professional individuals secured comfortable lives for themselves and their descendants.
The middle class
Social mobility
Sons of nobles pursued business careers; hardworking individuals from peasant backgrounds ascended to middle management and became factory owners within a generation.