9. Quality Flashcards
Porter’s perspective on value?
Value is NOT a code word for cost reduction. We should be increasing value in a couple of ways.
In what ways should we be increasing value?
Define value around the patient, this idea encompasses concept of EFFICIENCY
How to encompass the concept of efficient?
Value is an efficiency measure of outcome relative to cost. Cost reduction not related to outcome, doesn’t make sense. Cost IS part of outcome AND cost happens over time. We need to follow the process to see how outcome plays out over time. Now, Cost is FULL CYCLE over time, not just separate doc bills, consults, etc
How can we measure outcome now?
With SURVIVAL RATE, measured with mortality rate.
What other measures of outcomes can we use?
Degree of health/recovery, time to recovery, problems with care, sustainability
3 examples of degree of health/recovery?
Functional level achieved, pain level achieved, and extent of return to physical activities.
3 examples of time to recovery?
Time to treatment, time to return to physical activities, time to return to work
3 examples of problems with care?
Pain, length of hospital stay, infection
3 examples of sustainability?
Maintained functional level, ability to live independently, need for revision/cooperation
What should we be looking at, diagnosis wise (porter)?
Gotta take into account primary Dx AND all the other associated dx, OVER TIME. Right now we have no idea what the total costs are for everyone.
Current organization and informations systems? (4)
1) Not designed to measure or deliver value, impossible to find out. 2) Current measures are either too narrow (department) or broad (infection rate) to apply to individual pt outcome/value. 3) Currently measured by PROCESSES 4) Outcomes are unknown, continuity sucks (e.g. surgeons dunno how the pts doing 6 months post-op, everything’s been designed for short term)
Challenges with current organization and information system? (3)
1) No one collects patient level long term outcome data (Providers could use info to improve outcomes, but not available) 2) Costs collected and reported around structures not patients 3) Care involves shared resources; cost for each patient impossible to discern but huge variation exists
Tom Lee’s response?
This is all cool and everything, but unfortunately value is seen by docs as cost reduction. Current data reports show what we did; not what happened to patients. The PROBLEM is that this shit requires teamwork?an unnatural act in healthcare; shared accountability ? need a shitload of coordination.
According to Lee, what’s the best way of dealing with value?
Compare this years performance with last year’s performance…improve an outcome without sacrificing another, and reduce costs while achieving the same outcome.
4 steps being taken for value?
Value dashboards, pause points, individual checklists, and disease oriented teams (like, one for DM, stroke, etc)
Pause points?
What should happen at each point (e.g. palliative care consult at point of lung cancer diagnosis)
Individual checklists?
Based on research showing relationships to improved outcome for condition.
What ways can we use to improve quality in the meantime?
Ways to REDUCE ERROR by standardizing things that could go wrong. 1) Simplify, organize, reduce variability into a checklist, AND follow through. (big part of quality improvement). 2) Ensure all patients reliably receive intervention 3) Set up teams.
Set up teams?
YES…doctors can’t be in charge of doctors, what shit dun work. They tried putting out the checklists and not much happened?this is cuz doctors didn?t actually do it. THEN they were like, nurse covers checklists and can stop the procedure if they didn?t. Point? Not JUST the checklist, needs structure/authority for enforcement
How to define quality?
Right care, right time, the FIRST time. This includes, safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable (all groups in society get RC, Rt, FT), and patient centered