9 Mark Theories Flashcards
outline the theory of the multi-store model
- Attention Rehearsal
Sensory —>Short Term —> Long Term
Memory —> Memory
-sensory memory: capacity: large. encoding: visually, semantically and acoustically. duration: fraction of a second. for info from the sensory memory to get into STM we must pay attention to it.
-STM: capacity: 5-9 items. encoding: visually and acoustically. duration: 30 seconds. rehearsal moves information from the STM to LTM
-LTM: capacity: unlimited .encoding: semantically. duration: lifetime.
what is a strength of the multi-store model theory
*research support
P- support for the existence of different memory stores
E- Baddeley’s study of encoding shows that STM and LTM encode information differently
L-STM and LTM have qualitative differences
what is a weakness of the multi-store model theory
*simple
P- too simple as it suggests we only have 1 STM and 1 LTM
E-research shows that STM is divided into visual and acoustic stores and that LTM is divided into semantic, procedural and episodic
L- memory is more complex
what is a weakness of the multi-store model theory
*artificial materials
P- research uses artificial materials
E- eg. word lists and nonsense syllables
L- doesn’t illustrate the different ways we use memory
outline the theory of reconstructive memory
- memory is an active process. we store fragments of information and when we need to recall something we build these fragments into a meaningful whole however some elements are missing and is not accurate
- we record small pieces of information when events occur. later during recall we recombine the pieces to tell the story, every time we retell the story the elements are combined differently (reconstruction)
- when recombining pieces of information they can be impacted to what we believe to be true therefore social and cultural expectations may influence our memory
- effort after meaning: we focus on the meaning of events and afterwards we make an effort to interpret the meaning in more familiar terms
what is a weakness the theory of reconstructive memory
*some memories are accurate
P- wrong to suggest all memories are inaccurate
E- other studies have shown that sometimes memory can be accurate. (eg. in Bartlett’s war of the ghosts study people remembered the phrase “something black came out of his mouth” because it was distinctive)
L- shows that people don’t always actively construct memories and that some memories are accurate
what is a strength the theory of reconstructive memory
*realistic
P- Bartlett’s way of investigating memory reflects how we use memory in everyday life
E- he had his participants learn a story rather than using artificial tasks like word lists
L- therefore his research is more relevant to real-life memory processes
what is a strength the theory of reconstructive memory
*eye witness testimony
P- can explain issues with eye witness testimony
E- eye witness testimonies used to be regarded as important/valuable evidence however, Bartlett showed that our memory isn’t always accurate and can be affected by our expectations. due to this it is no longer heavily relied on
L- shows that Bartlett’s research had important consequences
outline Gibson’s theory of direct perception
NATURE
- perceptual abilities are innate
- direct perception: perceive using the information we receive through our senses, no need to make inferences from past experience (sufficient info for perception)
- no difference between perception and sensation
- affordances: use of an object can be perceived directly without past experience of it
- optic flow: allows us to know when we’re moving (make judgements about speed and distance), point we’re moving towards remains stationary and the rest of the view seems to push away from it
- motion parallax: helps us understand the speed of our movements , objects closer to us appear to be moving faster than objects further in the distance
- optic array (everything we can see) gives us all the information we need to be able to judge depth, distance and movement
- don’t need to learn to perceive the world around us. the environment around us is rich with information and our eyes are sophisticated enough to perceive it
what is a strength of Gibson’s theory of direct perception
*pilots
P- supported by research with pilots
E- when he worked for the US Army Air Force he found that all the information he needed to land a plane was the pattern of light that reached the eye
L- real world relevance, explains how we perceive the world around us on a daily basis
what is a strength of Gibson’s theory of direct perception
*young infants
P- the research being done on young infants provides good support
E- tested on very young children so its unlikely that their reluctance to crawl over the edge was something they learnt
L- shows that some perceptual abilities are due to nature and don’t need past experience to perceive the world
what is a weakness of Gibson’s theory of direct perception
*perceptual errors
P- perceptual errors aren’t easily explained
E- visual illusions are good examples of when we make perceptual errors and draw wrong conclusions about what we’re looking at, Gibson argues that what you see is what you get but illusions show that perception and sensation are separate processes
L- he doesn’t explain this so his research is limited
outline Gregory’s constructivist theory of perception
NURTURE
- stimuli in our environment are frequently ambiguous so for us to interpret it we need to access knowledge stored in our brain and makes inferences about what we perceive
- perception was influenced by past experiences
- constructivist theory: idea that we make sense of the world by building up our perceptions based on incoming data and clues we know about the world
- inferences: taking info and forming a conclusion about what it means based on other things you know
- nurture: refers to the aspects of behaviour that are acquired through experience
- mistaken hypothesis: where our brain draws the wrong conclusion from available evidence
- past experience: our understanding of visual cues is learned from experience. our perception becomes more sophistic as we grow older and interact more with the world around us. the way we’re raised can have a big influence of on our perception
what is a strength of Gregory’s constructivist theory of perception
*cultural differences
P- support from studies investigating cultural differences in perception
E- people in different parts of the world interpret visual cues differently (cultures with higher levels of schooling were better judges of depth)
L-: “nurture” effects our perception and our prior knowledge influences how we interpret objects
what is a weakness of Gregory’s constructivist theory of perception
*not usual perception
P- good explanation of illusions but its not our usual perception
E- illusions are designed to fool us
L- therefore not a good explanation of how we perceive objects every day
what is a weakness of Gregory’s constructivist theory of perception
*driven by nature
P- can’t explain how perception can be driven by nature
E- research shows that babies prefer human faces compare to random patterns from birth (before they received environmental input)
L- not all perception is a result of nurture, if culture was so influential we’d expect to see more differences in culture
outline Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
Theory:
-changes in thinking (cognition) over time (as we get older)
-children think differently from adults
Stages:-young children aren’t able to think logically about the world (brains aren’t mature enough)
-as the child gets older their brain develops and different kinds of thinking such as being able to think in abstract ways
Schemas:
-the world is represented in the mind where knowledge is stored
-as the child develops the construct more and more detailed and complex schemas
-number of schemas increase as we grow older through assimilation and accommodation
Assimilation:
when we we understand a new experience and add that new information to a new schema
Accommodation:
receiving new information that changes our understanding so a new schema is formed
what is a strength of Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
*a lot of research
P- enormous amount of research (evidence) to test his ideas
E- many studies have been conducted to test Piaget’s theory
L- we can be more certain about what aspects of his theory need refining which has helped improve our understanding of how children’s thinking develops
what is a weakness of Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
*sample
P- his research involved middle class European children E- children were in European academic families who valued academic abilities, in other social classes/cultures a greater value may be placed on a more basic level of concrete operations (eg.making things rather than abstract ideas) L- theory may not be universally applicable
what is a strength of Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
*real world application
P- has real world application
E- the theory has helped change classroom teaching so it’s now more activity based
L- demonstrates it’s positive value (usefulness)
outline Dweck’s mindset theory
mindset: set of assumptions we have–> affects success
Fixed Mindset:
-abilities/talent is fixed in their genes
-aren’t doing well , give up
-no amount of effort will change the situation
-focused on performance goals (doing well=feel good)
Growth Mindset:
-can improve with effort
-enjoy challenges
-focused on learning goals (working hard=feel good)
Dealing with failure:
-fixed: failure indicates lack of talent=give up
-growth: opportunity to learn more and put in more effort
Continuum:
-people are a mixture (not just one or the other)
-depends on the situation
what is a strength of Dweck’s mindset theory
*research evidence
P- research evidence shows that a growth mindset leads to better grades
E- Dweck found that children taught a growth mindset had better grades and motivation
L- shows that a growth mindset can be taught and can improve performance
what is a weakness of Dweck’s mindset theory
*involves praise
P- any sort of praise may be damaging
E- praising effort can still lead to doing things for approval from others rather than self satisfaction which can discourage independent behaviour
L- praise of effort may not be the best way to motivate learners
what is a strength of Dweck’s mindset theory
*real world application
P- has real world application
E- in business, sport and relationships ect. seeing failure as a lack of effort rather than talent motivates future effort
L- shows the positive value
outline Willingham’s learning theory
Theory:
-critical of learning styles theory as it had no evidence
-cognitive psychology and neuroscience can be used to improve learning
Praise:
-important to praise process (effort) rather than ability
-should be unexpected
-praise before a task led to less motivation in the future
-if performance depends on praise it destroys your natural sense of motivation
Memory and Forgetting:
-key reason for forgetting in not having the right cues
-rather than trying to memorise, practising retrieval of the information is more effective
Self-Regulation:
-self control is being able to control your behaviour, emotions, attention ect
-research has shown that young children who showed a high ability to delay gratification (marshmallow) performed higher on tests of school progress
Neuroscience:
-learning disorder like dyslexia have been associated with poor function in specific areas of the brain (brain waves in dyslexics are different)
-could benefit progress by receiving help earlier
what is a strength of Willingham’s learning theory
*evidence
P- all evidence based
E- based on scientific basis
L- great validity
what is a strength of Willingham’s learning theory
*real world application
P- focuses on applications to learning
E- positive impact on education as he gives an alternate approach to learning styles
L- research has real world value
what is a weakness of Willingham’s learning theory
*misleading
P- diagnosis on the basis of brain difference may not be possible
E- dyslexia can’t be diagnosed by brain waves as learning disorders are likely to have a number of causes
L- diagnosis of a condition such as dyslexia based of brain differences is unlikely and may be misleading
social factor of obedience: outline Milgram’s agency theory
Agency:
act as an agent (for someone else) because they assume that the person giving orders is taking responsibility
Agentic State:
act on behalf of someone else and would follow their orders blindly (person feels no responsibility for their actions
Autonomous State (free):
where they behave according to their own principles and feel responsible for their own actions
Agentic Shift:
moving from making own free choices to following orders (occurs when someone is in authority)
Culture (social hierarchy)
-some people have more authority than others because of their position in the social hierarchy
-depends on society and socialisation
Proximity:
-proximity increases the “moral strain” that a person feels which leads to an increased sense of personal responsibility
-Milgram: less obedient if the learner was in the same room as them
what is a strength of the social factor of obedience: Milgram’s agency theory
*research support
P- research support
E- Blass and Shmitt showed students a film of Milgram’s study, they blamed the experimenter rather than the participants
L- students recognised legitimate authority as a cause of obedience
what is a weakness of the social factor of obedience: Milgram’s agency theory
*doesn’t explain all findings
P- doesn’t explain why there isn’t 100% obedience
E- 35% of participants didn’t obey fully
L- social factors can’t fully explain obedience
what is a weakness of the social factor of obedience: Milgram’s agency theory
*obedience alibi
P- it “excuses” people who blindly follow destructive orders
E- offensive to the holocaust survivors as it suggests that the Nazis just obeyed orders and ignores roles that racism and prejudice played
L- dangerous, as it allows people to think they aren’t always personally responsible
dispositional factor of obedience: Adorno’s theory of the authoritarian personality
The Authoritarian Personality:
-exaggerated respect for authority
-more likely to obey orders
-very aware of their own and other’s social status
-look down on people of inferior social status
-very respectful to people of higher status
Cognitive Style:
-“black and white”
-belief in rigid stereotypes
Originates in Childhood:
-develops when a child experiences strict parenting/discipline
-child only receives love when they behave correctly
-the child internalises these values and expects all people to behave the same
-child also feels hostility towards parents but can’t express these feelings directly as they fear reprisals
Scapegoating:
-hostility felt towards parents for being critical is put onto people who are socially inferior
what is a weakness of the dispositional factor of obedience: Adorno’s theory of the authoritarian personality
*lack of support
P- lack of support due to the flawed questionnaire
E- the F scale used has a response bias
L- challenges validity as it’s based on poor evidence