Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

PYB215 - No. 2 > 9. Court phase 2: Court > Flashcards

9. Court phase 2: Court Flashcards

1
Q

when are juries used?

A
  • Civil and criminal trials
  • There are twelve (12) jurors for a criminal trial and four (4) for a civil trial.
  • Reserve jurors are permitted and range between two (2) and six (6).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who are members of the jury?

A
  • Members of the general public aged between 18 and 70
  • Random selection from the electoral rolls
  • Complete an eligibility questionnaire
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is included in the eligibility questionairre?

A

Are you any of the following?
current member of parliament
current mayor or other councillor of a local government
current or former judge or magistrate in Queensland or elsewhere
lawyer actually engaged in legal work
current or former police officer in Queensland or elsewhere
current or former correctional officer or detention centre employee
unable to read or write English
incapable of performing the duties of a juror because of a physical or mental disability
70 years of age or over and do not want to serve on a jury
current or former presiding member of the Land and Resources Tribunal
current member of the defence forces
None of the above

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what did a sample of the Qld district court juror contain?

A

Persons aged between 18 and 69 years
107 females (56%)
65 jurors had a University education (34%); 38 jurors had some other form of tertiary education (20%)
73 jurors were not in the workforce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what did UQ study find regarding juries?

A

Similar findings reported by UQ research (n = 33) (2009)

When compared with ABS statistics – jurors appear better educated than Queensland residents overall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is there almost no research on regarding juries?

A

There is almost no research pertaining to the number of Indigenous people called for jury service or sitting on Queensland juries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

who are members of the community that may be excluded from participating as jurors?

A

persons of old age, pregnant women, people with child-care responsibilities, people with a medical condition, individuals with prior criminal convictions, individuals who cannot speak English.

Those with professional involvement in the legal system and any number of skilled occupational group members (doctors, school teachers, ministers, senior bureaucrats).

All these exemptions from service make the jury pool less representative. (Chesterman, 2000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the voir dire process?

A

It has been argued that there is no aspect of a criminal trial that is more important to the ultimate outcomes than the jury selection process (Lieberman & Sales, 2007).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the two main goals of the Voi dire?

A

) whether the potential jurors are qualified to serve as jurors
2) to identify any biases that may interfere with their ability to be impartial

Objection to a juror can be raised by defense or prosecution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what can lawyers challenge in the voir dire process?

A

Lawyers make a challenge for cause to the judge that potential juror x is unsuitable for reasons y and the judge makes the decision to excuse or not.
Whether a juror’s particular background or beliefs make them biased and therefore unsuitable for service (Vidmar, 2000).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how long can voir dire processes take?

A

Voir dire typically lasts hours but can take months – especially in trials with intense pre-trial publicity (PTP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does the voir dire process provide to the defence and prosecution?

A

Gives both the defence and prosecution a specific number of unconditional peremptory challenges

Jurisdictions in Australia, Canada, France, New Zealand, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland and United States

No justifications (reasons) have to be brought to exclude a specific juror. 
Judges must exclude these jurors.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

who do defence lawyers generally exclude?

A

Generally, defence lawyers exclude jurors who have professions or backgrounds similar to the victim as they may feel an emotional link to them, while prosecutors tend to exclude jurors who may show affinity for the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the famous like about the difference between anglo-australian and american trials?

A

“With the Australians, the trial starts when jury selection is over; with Americans, when the jury is selected the trial is already over” (Knox, 2005, pg 46)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what juries does USA have by Australia does not?

A

grand juries?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are USA grand juries?

A

Role is to decide if there is enough evidence to go to trial (possibility of conviction)
16 – 23 general public citizens
Prosecutor only, no judge, no jury, no defendant represented.
99.9% indict to go to court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is the equivalent of USA grand juries?

A

Public prosecutors assess and decide on reasonable prospect of conviction.
If put forward, then goes to Magistrates courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what are the different modes of juries around the world?

A 
Lay persons (e.g., Australia, UK, USA, NZ, CAN)
Lay persons and judges (e.g., France, Italy, Germany)
Judges only (South Africa)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what happened in the Oscar Pistorius trial with regard to juries?

A

Oscar Pistorius trial was assigned to a Judge who appointed two assessors to help her evaluate the case and reach a verdict. There was no jury, the jury system in South Africa being abolished during apartheid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what also differs between jureis around the world?

A

Amount of information known about jurors
Jury size (criminal vs civil cases)
Unanimity versus majority verdicts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what are methods for studying jurors/juries?

A 
Post trial interviews
Archival research
Questionnaire surveys
E.g., The American Jury (Kalven & ZeiseL important book, first in-depth look at juries and other social-legal factors
Simulation (Mock juries)
Field studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what do post-trial interviews assess?

A

Assess jurors’ understanding of judges’ instructions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what are the issues of reliability of self-report data in regards to post trial interviews?

A

Hindsight bias

Social desirability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what are other issues of post trial interviews?

A

Jurors may not be explicitly aware of what influences them

Recall degrades over time

can only discuss variables not cause and effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What did a study in NSW find with regard to post trial interviews?

A

Post-trial interviews of jurors who served on six criminal trials in New South Wales disclosed that jurors who admitted difficulty understanding DNA expert evidence nevertheless proceeded to convict (Findlay 2008).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

what is the strength of post trial interviews?

A

high external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

what is archival research?

A

Records of trials, police interviews with witnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What are the weaknesses of archival research?

A

Only have the information available

Cannot go back and ask more questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

what is the strength of archival research?

A

High external validity but cannot establish cause and effect.

30
Q

what was the experiement involving questionnaire surveys?

A

Kalven and Zeisel (The American Jury) sent a questionnaire to 3500 judges in the US
15.8% responded (n = 555)
Data on 3576 trials (3% of all jury trials during the two-year sample period)
“By and large the jury understand the facts and get the case straight”
However, they only asked Judges if the jurors had understood the trial content.

31
Q

What do mock juries involve?

A

Most use written materials and undergraduates (Bornstein, 1999)

Participants are given the trial information and respond individually (juror research) or in groups (jury research)

Suggest that both characteristics of the defendant and the jurors impact on decisions

32
Q

what is the strength of mock juries?

A

High internal validity,

33
Q

what is the weakness of mock juries?

A

Most do not use deliberation
generally low external validity
Most research based on US system of law

34
Q

what is often manipulated with mock juries?

A

Independent variables are often manipulated
race or age of defendant
Admission or exclusion of some piece of evidence or defendant / plaintiff background

35
Q

what did Roos and Down’s (QUT) study involve?

A

Study regarding sexism and rape myth
If a sexual assault victim was violating gender norms (married woman out at night without her husband), would a mock jury member with strong sexist beliefs blame the victim?
283 participants were asked to consider that they were on a jury and were provided with a police report with statements from the victim and suspect. Half were told the victim was married and was out without her husband and half were not told anything about her marital status.
They were asked to provide a jury verdict (guilty or not guilty), verdict confidence level and sentencing.
69% found the perpetrator guilty, and 31% not guilty.
Rape myth acceptance was strongest predictor of victim blame.

36
Q

what is the issue of field studies?

A

Needs the courts cooperation which can be difficult

37
Q

what do field studies investigate?

A

Investigate, for example, differences between jurors that were allowed to take notes and those who were not

38
Q

what is the strength of field studies?

A

High external validity

39
Q

what resulted in the ban for recording of jury deliberations?

A

In The American Jury days, a District Court judge allowed taping of jury deliberations. When it was made public; resulted in law banning recording of jury deliberations.

40
Q

what are shadow juries?

A

Create your own jury
Matched demographics with sitting jury members
Jury eligible people
Paid to attend the case and debriefed (normally daily) to inform the legal team of any confusion or risk due to perceptions by jury
Provide their reactions and opinions.
Sometimes called jury monitors

41
Q

what are the disadvantages of jury note taking?

A

Note takers exert influence over non-note takers

If there are disagreements, jurors will rely on those who took notes

42
Q

what are the advantages of jury note taking?

A

Memory aid

Clear view of the case (memory)

43
Q

When is “Strike that from the record” and “I object” used in court?

A

When there is inadmissible evidence. Jurors do not ignore extra-legal or inadmissible evidence. Sometimes the back-fire effect occurs, the judge’s instruction to disregard the information actually makes it more memorable

44
Q

What is the back-fire effect?

A

Strike that from the record” and “I object” are used. sometimes the back-fire effect occurs, the judge’s instruction to disregard the information actually makes it more memorable

45
Q

how is jury competency affected?

A

As case complexity increased, jurors less sure their verdict reflected a proper understanding of instructions (Heuer & Penrod, 1995)

46
Q

Why is it difficult to comprehend differences between legal terms?

A

Serious difficulty comprehending differences between legal concepts (Severance & Loftus)

Reasonable doubt
Criminal intent
Use of prior offence history

47
Q

What did research on jury duty following instructions show?

A

224 people called for jury duty, research indicated they understood less than 50% of instructions

48
Q

what is a finding about comprehending evidence?

A

Jurors are conscientious about their task, but this fades away during the trial

49
Q

What did Visher found about influencing jurors?

A

Visher found four types of evidence significantly influenced jurors:
Physical evidence,
Eyewitness testimony,
Discrediting testimony and evidence
Extra-legal factors of social class & education, personality, etc

50
Q

What did Judge Jerome Frank say about jury competence?

A

“While the jury can contribute nothing of value in so far as the law is concerned, it has the capacity for infinite mischief, for twelve men can easily misunderstand more law in a minute than the judge can explain in an hour” - Judge Jerome Frank

(Heuer & Penrod, 1995, pg 527)

51
Q

What characteristics of jurors are more likely to convict

A

Older jurors
Higher educational standard (Hans & Vidmar)
Previous jury experience (Dillehay & Nietzel)
Female jurors
But only in rape cases (Hans & Vidmar) or child sexual abuse cases (Crowley et al.)

52
Q

which gender is more likely to convict in rape or child sex abuse cases?

A

females

53
Q

What can reduce the differences between genders regarding convictions of rape and child sexual abuse?

A

Deliberation

54
Q

What is not related to conviction?

A

the race of the jury and authoritarianism and conservatism

55
Q

What was interestingly discovered in the First Rodney King trial with regards to race and juries?

A

Black defendants more likely to be perversely convicted regardless
But: First Rodney King trial, all white jury acquitted four white police officers; Second trial utilised a mixed-race jury who convicted

56
Q

what has the American Jury selection created?

A

American Jury selection has created a mini-industry of jury consultants whose job it is to build profiles of jurors and advise lawyers on challenges (Knox, 2005)

One trial attorney said: “it had gotten to the point where if the case is large enough it almost malpractice not to use them” (Knox, 2005)

57
Q

what is the cognitive story model?

A

Jurors actively construct explanations for the evidence and use this to guide their verdict
They interpret and elaborate on evidence to create a cohesive story
Jurors bring their own individual differences – attitudes, beliefs, knowledge – in contributing to the story
Study on 26 participants (simulated trial) demonstrated that different individual differences influenced different stories and therefore different verdicts.
Pennington & Hastie (1986)

58
Q

what are physically attractive defendants more liekly to be granted?

A

Physically attractive defendants are more likely to be acquitted (Michelini & Snodgrass) or receive a lighter sentence (Stewart)

59
Q

when are defendants more likely to be seen as guilty?

A

Defendants are more likely to be seen as guilty if their ethnicity matches stereotypic expectations (Bodenhausen, 2000)

60
Q

what is over-represented in custody?

A

Racial minorities over-represented in custody
Australia – (2008),
Indigenous people are 3% of the total population but are 28% of prison population. 30% of all Indigenous males will come before the courts.

61
Q

what happened in the OJ Simpson trial with regards to jury deliberation?

A

The OJ Simpson criminal trial
Jury had to evaluate the evidence of 120 witnesses presented over 10 months
They took less than 4 hours to acquit OJ

62
Q

what questions did the OJ simpson trial raise with regard to jury deliberaitons?

A

Raises some questions…
Did they wait for formal deliberations to actually deliberate?
Did they reach a verdict before deliberations?
How could they possibly evaluate all of that evidence meaningfully?

63
Q

Does deliberation alter jury decisions?

A

General belief that jurors have already decided a verdict before they retire (see Kalven & Zeisel)

BUT

Hastie et al. found that the minority managed to prevail in 25% of cases. There needs to be comparison of differences between verdict and evidence driven deliberations

64
Q

what is verdict driven jury deliberation?

A

Verdict driven: vote and talk about verdict early on in deliberations

65
Q

What is evidence driven deliveration?

A

Evidence driven: talk about evidence first, vote much later in deliberations

66
Q

What is polarisation?

A

Polarisation: Become more extreme in belief following group discussion

67
Q

What is leniency?

A

Leniency: Become more forgiving (lenient) following deliberation.

68
Q

What is the CSI effect?

A

Education of jurors whereby they are more likely to convict a suspect if the procedures and techniques from television are used in real life.
Watching unrealistic crime shows influences jurors expectations and they demand more forensic evidence

DNA tests can take weeks or months and are expensive
DNA is not always required if other evidence is available
Gun residue tests are very difficult and time consuming
Blood splatter patterns alone cannot confirm what actually occurred
Fingerprints can take 3-4 weeks, IF the prints are in a database it can still take significant time to physically locate the person.
It is not that easy or common to get a ‘good fingerprint’.

Characters on show not only investigate (“process”) crime scenes, but they also conduct raids, engage in suspect pursuit and arrest, interrogate suspects, and solve cases, which falls under the responsibility of uniformed officers and detectives, not CSI personnel

69
Q

what percentage of scientific techniques used in CSI exist in current technology?

A

Up to 40% of the scientific techniques used on CSI do not exist with current technology

70
Q

how are perpetraitors using CSI and crime shows to their advantage?

A

Perpetrators are using ‘hints’ gained from television shows to attempt to hide their crimes.
Washing hands, making (rape) victims wash, trying not to leave DNA evidence behind, destroying evidence

71
Q

What are some modern juror issues?

A

Internet and social media platforms’ accessibility means that potential jurors can access information about a case at their fingertips.
People so used to gaining instant information, find it very difficult to restrain from searching.
Can bias a juror either for or against a defendant.
Jurors not only obtain information but also post information about the case (such as on Facebook or Twitter)
Creating ‘new’ problems for legislation and the courts to try to solve.

72
Q 
what is One juror's reflection of the jury process?
This juror was a middle-aged, middle class Caucasian woman called for jury service in Australia
A

She was uncomfortable being called for jury service but once there was surprised at her reaction of wanting to be there* (*this is common reaction, (Knox, 2005))
Being a juror was life changing experience for her
Procedures were explained to her and her fellow jurors, they were given pencil and paper to take notes
They were directed not to take notes home or discuss the trial with anyone outside the court
that they all needed more explanation and instruction than they were given to be effective in discharging their duties
that being a juror is a heavy responsibility
that there should be most discussion among jurors of the process
that people need to be more educated about what is EXPECTED of jurors
that the jury made a decision based more on class relations than the actual event
that her experience of jury service was not a good one because she continues to be unsure of the defendant’s guilt

PYB215 - No. 2 (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions