9) Corporate Insolvency I Flashcards
Principal statute dealing with corporate insolvency
Insolvency Act 1986
Amendment of IA1986
- Enterprise Act 2002 - promoted rescue of companies, and new admin procedure
- Small Business Enterprise and Employment Act 2015
- Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016
*Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020
Two key insolvency procedures introduced by IA 1986
Aim of corporate rescue
* Company voluntary arrangements
* Administration
Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 introduced
- Restructuring plan also aimed at rescuing the company
Meaning of insolvency
s122(1)(f) IA 1986
A company must be wound up “if it is unable to pay its debts”
Four tests of insolvency
- The Cash Flow Test (123(1)(e))
- The Balance Sheet Test (123(2))
- Failure to comply with a statutory demand for a debt of over £750 (123(1)(a))
- Failure to satisfy enforcement of a judgment debt (123(1)(b))
The most commonly used tests for insolvency
Cash flow test
Balance sheet test.
s123 (1) (e)
The cash flow test = an inability to pay debts as they fall due.
s123(2)
The balance sheet test = the company’s liabilities are greater than its assets.
s123(1)(a)
Failure to comply with a statutory demand for a debt of over £750
s123(1)(b)
Failure to satisfy enforcement of a judgement debt
Directors’ obligation in financial difficulties
Directors must review the financial performance of a company and recognize when it is facing financial difficulties
Directors have a duty to promote the success of the company for the benefit of the members as a whole
s172 CA 2006
Duty of directors in insolvency
Duty changes in cases of potential insolvency from members to creditors.
Interest of creditors are to be balanced alongside the interests of the members
Case that clarifies the interests of creditors against members
BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA
BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA
Principle
The further a company deteriorates and less likely it is to recover, more weight should be given to the interests of creditors.
Who can enforce a breach for not considering the interest of the creditors
The company, liquidator s or adminstrator
The duty is owed to the company, not the creditors and only the company can enforce the breach
BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA
Three principles - when to consider creditors
- Not when there is a risk of insolvency
- Duty engaged when
- Balance sheet or cash flow insolvent; Bordering on a state of insolvency; Likely to enter a formal insolvency process.
- Interests of creditors prevails where insolvent liquidation or administration is inevitable.
BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA
Case
- Liability for river pollution
- Dividend payment was allowed
- Did not amount to defrauding creditors.
- Scale of liability was uncertain
Options for a company facing financial difficult
- Do nothing
- Apply for pre-insolvency moratorium
- Do a deal
- Appoint an adminsitrator
- Put the company into liquidation
Options for a company facing financial difficult: Do nothing
Directors risk personal liability under IA 1986 and breach directors’ duties under the CA 2006
Options for a company facing financial difficult: Apply for a pre-insolvency moratorium
This gives the company some “breathing space”
Options for a company facing financial difficult: Do a deal
Reach either an informal or formal agreement with the company’s creditors with a view to rescheduling debts.
Options for a company facing financial difficult:
Appoint an administrator
Collective formal insolvency procedure which aims if possible to rescue the company.
Options for a company facing financial difficult:
Liquidation
Collective formal insolvency procedure under which a company’s business is wound up and its assets transferred to creditors and (if there is a surplus of assets) to its members.
Corporate insolvency procedures
- Informal arrangements
- Formal arrangements
- Company voluntary arrangement
- Restructuring plan
- Administration
- Liquidation.
Key feature of formal arrangements
- CVAs and Restrucuturing Plans
- Directors remain in control of the company and can exercise
Administration and Liquidation - control
Take control of the company and the directors are then unable ot take decisions on behalf of the company
Informal agreements
- To avoid time and cost of formal insolvency
- Difficulty is getting all creditors to agree to decisions on behalf of the company
- additional payments / security / reschedule debts / hold salaries.
- Standstill agreements
Standstill agreements
Agree not to take enforcement action for a certain period of time to give the company a breathing space to reach agreement with other creditors.
Likely to decline in use following CIGA 2020, pre insolvency moratorium
Pre-Insolvency Moratorium
- Pre-insolvency moratorium for struggling companies that are not yet in formal insolvency rocess.
- Moratorium is a period during which creditors are unable to take action to enforce debts.
- Comes to an end when enter formal arrangement or insovlency procedure
CIGA 2020
Moratorium
- A period during which creditors are unable to take action to enforce debts.
- Lasts 20 business days, can be extended for another 20. Further extensions can be agreed
- Max is up to 1 year
- Court order to extend further.
Procedure for obtaining the pre-insolvency moratorium
- Apply to the court s A3 IA 1986 accompanied by s A6
- Statement that a company is, or is likely to become unable to pay debts
- Statement from a monitor, that this is an eligible company (sch ZA1)
It is likely that a moratorium will result in the rescue of the company. - Moratorium into force once documents are filed.
- Monitor steps in
Monitor
- Specialist external individual - usually accountabnt.
- Has responsibility to notify the registrar of companies and creditros of the company that the moratorium is in force.
- Has a supervisory function
Company Voluntary Arragement
s1(1) IA 1986: “ a composition in satisfaction of its debts or a scheme of arrangement of its affairs”
* Agreement for part payment or timetable
* **Must be reported to a court **- need not be approved (s4(6))
* Implemented by an Insolvency Practioner
s1(1) IA 1986
A composition in satisfaction of its debts or a scheme of arrangement of its affairs
Setting up a CVA
- Company not in liquidation or administration - directors draft proposals and appoint nominee.
- Submit proposals to nominee (Insolvency Practitioner)
- Considered within 28 days, report to a court on whether to call a meeting of company and creditor
- Nominee to give 14 days meeting to creditors
- Voting
- Nominee reports to court on approval
- Supervisor and proposals
Voting on CVA
Proposals must be approved by:
- 75% in value of creditors
- Simple majority of members
How are CVAs used
- Either alone or within administration
- To reach a compromise with creditors - especially landlords
- CVA’s remain in control of the company, can trade.
- Disadvantage cannot bind secured or preferential creditors
Why are CVAs relatively rarely uesd
- Largely due to the complexity of the procedure
- The fact that secured and preferential creditors are not bound by the proposals
Examples of the companies that have used CVAs
- All Saints
- Frankie & Benny’s (owned by The Restaurant Group)
- New Look
Likely that CVAs will decline further
Ultimately to be replaced by the restructuring plan introduced by CIGA 2020
Restructuring Plan
- Introduced by CIGA 2020
- Purpose of the Plan is to compromise a company’s creditors and shareholders & restructure liabilities
- Bind secured creditors and displace CVAs.
Features of a Restructuring Plan CIGA 2020
- Creditors must be divided into classes
- Each class that votes on the Plan must be asked to approve it.
- Plan must be approved by at least 75% in value of each class of voting.
- Court must sanction the Plan and it will bind all creditors.
Parties who can apply for the court for sanction of a Plan are:
- The Company
- Creditor
- Member
- Liquidator
- Administrator
Advantages of a restructuring Plan
- Court can sanction a Plan if it is just and equitable to do so even if
- One or more classes do not vote to approve the plan.
- It brings about a cross class cramdown
- Brings about a cramdown of shareholders.
- Can be used by administrators and liquidators
- Can be used against secured creditors and shareholders
Cross Class Cramdown
Where a class of creditor can force the Plan on another class of creditor who has voted against the Plan
Cramdown of shareholders
Means forcing shareholders to accept the Plan, diluting equity, creating debt for equity swaps.
Objectives of administrator
- Collective procedure - acts in the interests of creditors as a whole
- May continue trading , others may go into adminstration
Administration
A procedure which aims to rescue a company which is insolvent if at all possible, or to achieve a better result for creditors if not
Cath Kidson
Went into administration in 2020, resulting in closure of their high street shops, but continuation of the online business.
BHS
Went into administration in 2016, ultimately into liquidation.
Objectives of administration - statutory basis
Section 8 and Sch B1 IA 1986 set out the objectives of the administration
Section 8 and Sch B1 IA 1986
Must perform his functions with an objective of
* Rescuing the company as a going concern.
* Achieving a better result for the company’s creditors as a whole than would be likely if the company were wound up.
* Realizing the property to make distribution to secure / preferential creditors
Appointment of administrator
- Court procedure
- Out of court procedure
Appointment of administrator - Court procedure
- Court may appoint an administrator where the company is or is likely to become unable to pay its debts SchB1 para 12
- Appointment may be where the order is reasonably likely to achieve the purpose of the administration **Sch B1 para 11(b))
AA Mutual Insurance Co Lt 2004
- Applicant was an insurance company which sought an adminstrative order.
- Court found probable that the applicant is unlikely to be able to pay his debts.
- Administration held to be a better outcome fore creditors thatn winding up.
Appointment of administrator - out of court procedure
Following parties may appoint an administrator using the out of court procedure.
* Company or directors Sch B1 para 22 IA 1986
* Qualifying floating charge holder Sch B1 Para 14 IA 1986 - usually bank
Qualifying Floating Charge Holder
Means the holder of a floating charge created after the 15th September 2003 relating to the whole, or substantially the whole, of the company’s property
Most common method of appointing and administrator
By directors using the out of court procedure.
Directors cannot use the out of court procedure
Where a creditor has presented a petition for the winding up o the company .
Directors can apply for an admin order or the qualifying floating charge.
Role of the administrator
- Officer of the court
- Owes its duty to all of the company’s creditors
- Directors need consent for administrator.
- Takes on the running of the business.