4 Flashcards
s239 CA 2006
Directors may avoid liability if breach is capable of subsequent approval / ratification by sharheolders
Are remedies for breach in the CA 2004?
No s178 provides that common law and equitable remedies still apply
Shareholders sanctions
MA 4 - SR can force to do or not to do
s168 CA 2006 - Removal by SR
s21 CA 2006 - Amendment of Articles
Key powers of directors
MA 3 - Manage company
MA 8 - pass decisions by unanimous consent
Principle of equitable fiduciary duties
- Must not benefit from their position of trust
Case law for Directors Duties
Older case law still valid, as Directors duties are interepted in line with Common Law and Equitable Principles
General Duties of Directors under Part 10 CA 2006
171 - Act within powers
172 - promote success of company
173 - Independent powers
174 - Reasonable skill care and diligence
175 - Avoid CoI
176 - Benefits from third partes
177 - Interest in transactions
s171 - Quick fire
Act within powers
s172 - Quick fire
Promote success of company
s173 - Quick fire
Independent judgement
s174 - Quick fire
Reasonable skill, care and diligence
s175 - Quick fire
Avoid Conflicts of Interests
s176 - Quick fire
Avoid benefits from third parties
s177 - Quick fire
Disclose interests in transactions to the board
Section 171 Components
Act within powers
- Duty to act within company’s constitution
- Duty to exercise powers for the purposes they are conferred (Proper Purposes)`
Proper Purpose
Bona fide interests of the company, not for any collateral purpose.
Hogg v Cramphorn
New shares issued to employees
Special voting rights
Avoid hostile takehover.
* Allotment of shares held to be void and improper use of directors power to issue shares
* Capable of ratification by shareholders.
Howard Smith v Ampol Petroleum Ltd
- Issue of shares to frustrate takeover
- Not proper purpose
- Proper purse raising equity
Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil & Gas Plc
- Disenfranchise for non comopliance
- Corporate raid
- Exploiit minority to get effective voting control, without paying pprice for shares
- Disclosure notices - used to prevent minority voting
- Not proper purposes
Key case for determinining improper purpose
Extrasure travel insurances ltd v scattergood.
Extrasure travel insurances ltd v scattergood.
- Objective test for improper purpose
- Identify power exercise in question
- Identify the purpose of the delegated power
- Identify the substantial purpose of powers use
- Decide if proper
Teck Corporation v Millar
- Overlap between proper purpose and successs (172)
- If takeover will cause substantial damage / be a bad deal
- May be able to issue shares for other reasons that raising capital
Provided it is for benefit of the whole
Section 172
Promote success of the company
* Act honestly and in good faith
* In the interests of the company
* Subjective test - element of objectivity (Reasonable director)
* Success of company - relies on relationships
Defining success
s 172(A)
Long term increase in value
What is not success of a company
- Preference payments - breach of creditors interests
- Hiding director misconduct
Section 173
Independent judgment - bust not agree to fetter discretion of directors
Individual nature of duty