9. Constitutional Justice 2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Other Functions of Constitutional/Supreme Courts

A
  1. Jurisdictional disputes
  2. Political Parties: Decision-making related to matters of unconstitutional acts and activities.
  3. Referendum: Decision-making regarding its conformity to the Constitution
  4. Elections: Decision-making regarding the conformity of proceedings with the Constitution and Statute Law
  5. Check on the state of emergency
  6. Capacity for office
  7. Impeachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of jurisdictional disputes

A
  • Constitutional powers (branches of gov):
    • Top government bodies
    • Courts
  • Territorial entities (state/regional/local)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Top government bodies jurisdictional dispute

A

France, Art. 39 (pars. 3&4): house and president of the Rep. arguing over the tabling of government bills

  • “Government Bills may not be included on the agenda if the Conference of Presidents of the first House to which the Bill has been referred, declares that the rules determined by the Institutional Act have not been complied with.”
  • “Within the conditions provided for by statute, the President of either House may submit a Private Member’s Bill tabled by a Member of the said House, before it is considered in committee, to the Conseil d’État for its opinion, unless the Member who tabled it disagrees.”

Italy, Art. 37 of Law 87/1953

  • “If a region approves an act that invades the sphere of competence of the State or of another region, the State or the interested region may lodge a claim with the Constitutional Court to decide who the competence belongs to”
  • With exception of statute law, all acts of state or region may be the root of a dispute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Courts jurisdictional disputes

A

Brazil, Art. 102.o: conflicts of jurisdiction between the Superior Tribunal of Justice and any other tribunals, between Superior Tribunals, or between the latter and any other tribunal shall be to processed and adjudicated by Federal Supreme Court whose responsibility is to safeguard the Constitution and it is incumbent upon it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Territorial entities jurisdictional disputes

A
  • Brazil, Art. 102.f: disputes and conflicts between the Republic and the States, the Republic and the Federal District, or between one another, including their respective indirect administration entities is responsible by Federal Supreme Court
  • Germany, Art. 93
  • Italy, Art. 37 of Law 87/1953
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Political parties

A

Germany, Art. 21.2:

  • “Parties that, by reason of their aims or the behaviour of their adherents, seek to undermine or abolish the free democratic basic order or to endanger the existence of the Federal Republic of Germany shall be unconstitutional. The Federal Constitutional Court shall rule on the question of unconstitutionality.”
  • => Socialist Reich Party (SRP) - an openly Neo-fascist political party was the first party to be banned by the Federal Constitutional Court in 1952
  • Communist Party of Germany (KPD) - banned in 1956.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Referendum

A

Colombia, Art. 241

conformity of referendums with the Constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Elections

A

Germany Art. 41

  • “1. Scrutiny of elections shall be the responsibility of the Bundestag. It shall also decide whether a Member has lost his seat.
    2. Complaints against such decisions of the Bundestag may be lodged with the Federal Constitutional Court.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Check on the state of emergency

A

in France, the courts are consulted by the President of the Republic when emergency measures are taken and can perform checks after 30 days to determine whether the conditions for a state emergency still exists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Capacity for office and impeachment

A
  • Constitutional Court may secure a vote of incapacitation of the head of state through an absolute majority and pass presidential powers to the Senate
  • Moreover, Constitutional/Supreme Courts also have a power of impeachment of the head of state, the Prime Minister and other ministers or State representatives.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sources of Italian Constitutional Court (ICC)

A

The Italian Constitutional Court is regulated by:

  • Articles 134-137 of the 1948 Constitution;
  • Constitutional laws (1/1948, 1/1953, 2/1967);
  • Statute law 87/1953.
  • came into effect on January 1948

should be noted that the Court did not actually start opening until 1956 => first 8 years constitutional adjudication was carried out by Supreme Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Composititon of ICC

A

The Court is composed by 15 judges:

  • 5 appointed by the President of the Republic;
  • 5 appointed by the Parliament in joint session;
  • 5 appointed by the Supreme Courts:
    • 1 by the Council of state
    • 1 by the Court of Auditors
    • 3 by the Cassation Court
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Procedures and requirements for judges

A
  • Appointed for 9 years;
  • No re-election;
  • are chosen among lawyers, full professors and judges;
  • granted immunity, untouchability, salary, administrative and financial autonomy,
  • but refrain from any other professional, political or associational activity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Model of constitutional review (ICC)

A

Hybrid system of review:

  • centralized;
  • a posteriori;
  • both principaliter and incidenter.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The ICC Functions

A

exclusive jurisdiction over:

  1. constitutional review of laws and acts having the force of law;
  2. jurisdictional disputes between branches of government within the State
  3. jurisdictional disputes over the allocation of powers between the State and the Regions;
    • Legislative
    • “Other” acts
  4. impeachment against the President of the Republic;
  5. admissibility of abrogative referendum (art. 75 Const.).
    • Art. 75.2 Const.
    • From 1978:
      • No constitutional laws
      • No laws with a constitutionally-dictated content
      • No unclear questions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Flaw of Art 134.1 on Constitutional Review

A
  • “Constitutional Court shall decide on disputes concerning the constitutional legitimacy of laws and acts having force of laws”
  • have to clarify what term “law” refers to => choose to also include constitutional amendment law => can review state and regional statute laws, state but not regional acts of having force of law
  • secondary sources of law (gov regulations), European laws and parliamentary standing orders are excluded
17
Q

2 types of ICC proceedings

A
  1. Incidenter
  2. Principaliter
18
Q

The parameter of judgement

A

refers to act that the law under review is compared with

=> parameter includes:

  • Constitution
  • Constitutional supreme principles
  • International customs (Art. 10) - must conform European directives and with Concordate between Italy and Holy See
  • Parametro interposto: Art. 117, 76 - State framework laws

examples of parameters that are interposed between the act under scrutinity and Cons. (norme interposte)

19
Q

Incidenter proceedings

A
  • consist of a claim filed by an ordinary court judge
  • carried out during a regular trial
  • adopted when the question of unconstitutionality is raised => pending court case
  • judge a quo - ordinary judge
  • judge a quem - Constitutional Court
  • 2 requirements for unconstitutionality to be referred to Court:
    1. subjective - one has to be in the presence of a judge that is a part of of ordinary/administrative judiciary system (a quo would carry out a preliminary review)
    2. has to be a pending case during the course of which judicial power is exercised
  • The question must be relevant and not clearly unfounded aka provisions (object of the claim) are essential for the judge to deliver a decision
20
Q

Principaliter proceedings

A
  • used by State to lodge a claim against a regional law or vice versa
  • State may take action against regional law for violation of Cons.
  • Regions can only lodge claim with Cons. Court against a state law if it interferes with their competences
21
Q

Types of decisions

A

2 main categories:

  1. judgements - Court makes a final and unappealable decision => terminate proceedings
  2. orders - takes a procedural decision that does not close the case

However, Court may deliver judgement even when decision it takes is procedural

22
Q

Characteristics of ICC’s decision

A

Decisions of the Italian Constitutional Court are:

  1. Inadmissibility
  2. Acceptance:
    • Full acceptance
    • Interpretative
    • Manipulative
  3. Dismissal:
    • Full dismissal
    • Interpretative
    • Exhortative
23
Q

Inadmissibility

A
  • question of unconstitutionality will be inadmissable when procedural conditions for Court to decide merits of the case are not satisfied - did not have locus standi
  • object of question of unconstitutionality is an act that cannot be reviewed by CC. e.g. a parliamentary standing order
  • law contrasts with self-executing European laws
  • thema decidendum - when provisions/constitutional parameter are not clearly indicated
24
Q

Acceptance and dismissal

A
  • Full acceptance - erga omnes effect
  • Interpretative
    • decision based on difference between provision (written text of legislative act) and norm (meaning given to provision by Courts)
    • => interpretative judgement of either acceptance or dismissal
      • acceptance: may be more than one norm => underlines meaning given to provision is in pursuance of Cons. (norm A) but in practice, it violates Cons. (norm B)
      • dismissal: reasoning is opposite - interpretation given to provision by the judge a quo is unconstitutional (norm A) but in practice, in pursuance of Cons (norm B)
25
Q

Acceptance - manipulative

A
  • CC does not declare unconstitutionality but modifies/integrates it in some way
  • types:
    • partial acceptance - declare certain parts as uncons. while leaving other parts unscathed.
    • additive judgements - Unconstitutional “since it lacks the following sentence”
      • Sent 190/1970: CC held that Art 304 of Italian Criminal Procedure Code was unconstitutional to the extent that it did not permit the presence of the defence counsel during interrogation of defendant.
      • However, in practice, while could not be present at key trial events, can attend pre-trial events
    • substitutive judgements - Unconstitutional “to the extent it reads ‘X’ rather than ‘Y’”. In this case, the object of constitutional illegitimacy is “substituted” by the Constitutional Court itself as opposed to legislation being simply stroke down.
      • Sent 15/1969: CC declared Art 313.3 of Criminal Code uncons. because it granted consent to prosecution to Minister of Justice instead of the Court itself
26
Q

Dismissal - exhortive

A
  • Not unconstitutional but a legislative reform is necessary
  • Famous case: Sent 225/1974 which CC provided a set of rules of for the reform of Italy’s public television service