10. Fundamental rights and freedom Flashcards
Rights and evolution of Constitutionalism
- 1600-1900: golden age of development of human rights
- In Medieval, social classes and other groups (guilds, associations, churches) rather than individuals to receive protection => only social groups had rights vis-a-vis the State
Magna Carta (1215)
- first attempt to
- writ habeas corpus (recourse in law through which a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court to determine whether the detention is lawful)
- protect the freedom of movement and to circumscribe the power of the Crown
- these rights were extended to all individuals regardless of their social position
- Among them was:
- the right of the church to be free from governmental interference
- the rights of all free citizens to own and inherit property and to be protected from excessive taxes.
- “For a trivial offence, a free man shall be fined only in proportion to the degree of his offence, and for a serious offence correspondingly, but not so heavily as to deprive him of his livelihood” => established principles of due process and equality before the law
English Bill of Rights (1689)
- Where the liberal concept of rights began
- primary law that set the stage for a constitutional monarchy in England.
- credited as being an inspiration for the U.S. Bill of Rights.
- protection of individual rights = eminent and irrenounceable function of State organisation
- impose punishment and regulate a standing army based on the rule of law
- creates separation of powers, limits the powers of the king and queen, enhances the democratic election and bolsters freedom of speech
US Constitution
- Modern age of constitutional rights following the American revolution
- Approved in 1787
- 1791: the 10 Amendments (American Bill of Rights) entered into effect to protect
- freedom of religion, press, speech, assembly
- freedom from excessive fines and forfeitures from double jeopardy
- right to bear arms, to be secure and to due process
- These freedoms were considered to be pre-exisitng conditions rather than rights sanctioned by Bill of Rights
- Rights to ensure is free from undue interference of public powers
Declaration of the Rights of Man (France, 1789)
- In comparison to American Bill of Rights, it is much more philosophical, wordy and less suitable for immediate application
- Arose from different political agenda/situation
- US: drawn up when independence of nation and enjoyment of individual rights = reality
- France: declaration of juridicial form to a social reality yet to be constructed
- In the following years after 1789, French Declr. was replaced by a series of subsequent Cons.
- Its model rapidly circulated around Europe due to its innovative character + Napoleonic wars
- 1848: official French Cons. was drawn up - protection of basic rights = paramount
General comparisons among European Cons.
- Out of all, French is regarded to be the most democratic
- 1849: German adopted their own bill of rights
- 1848: Italy also adopted, but proved to be a modest instrument as far as protecting right goes; inferior to both FR and DE
- Post WWI, radical int’ political aligments called for new rights formulation => Weimar Cons (1919)
- put human rights at the centre of Cons => no longer mere limit to public power
- passage from liberal to democratic constitutionalism
- After WWII, new phase of constitutionalism - unalienable rights = nucleus of Cons., emphasising ethical and social values
- => 1948: Italian Cons. came into force
Negative freedoms vs. positive rights
- Positive liberty is the possession of the capacity to act upon one’s free will, as opposed to negative liberty, which is freedom from external restraint on one’s actions
- Negative freedoms: freedoms given by interference/intervention from the states. E.g. individual rights
- aim was to ensure public power abstained from authoritarian and repressive actions
- Difference is not intervention but rather the goal/ the way it is structured
- Liberty through the states = allow to fulfill my goals (economic and political rights) – given equal opportunity
First generation right
- First generation rights are also called negative freedoms or civil and political rights.
- civil rights: initimate sphere of personal freedom, inherent to man’s physical nature, protect integrity of each individual as physical person. e.g. right to domicile, prohibition of double jeopardy
- political rights: protection of social sphere because through them, the individual participates
- They are enshrined in the flexible constitutions of the liberal state.
Prussian Cons. and first gen. rights (1850)
- Art. 5: All personal freedoms are guaranteed.
- Art. 6: All homes are unassailable.
- Art. 9: Property is sacred.
- Art. 12: The freedom of religious believes and the formation of religious organizations is guaranteed.
Second generation rights
- Second generation rights are also called positive rights or social and economic rights.
- only when States act to remove obstacles to social inequality does a social right exist
- They are enshrined in the rigid constitutions of the democratic state.
- After WWII, particularly plenty in Europe
- Concides with liberal constitutionalism and democratic constitutionalism
- Democratic constitutionalism:
- Social goals as part of the state
- Cons. can regulate and shape society indirectly; can be drawn from anytime
- A people’s constitution is the supreme law that legitimates, limits, and empowers the government, which, if democratic, is based on periodic and competitive election of representatives by virtually all the adult population.
- Principal of humanity in the Cons. – aspiration of democratic constitutionalism is to give framework for answers in any situation => horizontal application of rights = unlike Canada and US (liberal), rights not only bind public authorities but also citizens in their daily interactions => e.g. if I violate competition law, the consequences I incurred is bound/enforced by Cons.
Italian Cons. and 2nd gen. rights (1848)
Article 38 [Welfare]
- All citizens unable to work and lacking the resources necessary for their existence shall be entitled to private and social assistance.
- Workers shall be entitled to adequate insurance for their needs in case of accident, illness, disability, old age, and involuntary unemployment.
Third generation rights
- Third generation rights developed during the 70s constitutionalism (3rd cycle) ; known as new rights
- They include individual rights of a private nature (image, honour and identity) as well as the right to a clean environment or to peace.
- Adopted by Portugal, Spain, Greece
- These new rights merely reflect the idea that rights are not abstract – rights can evolve and change
- There’s no such thing as exhaust list of rights that needs to be protected
- Originalism: strong conviction that Cons. needs to be enforced => can still be updated
- Added through case laws (1st and 2nd cycle uses this method to add laws)
Portuguese Constitution and 3rd gen. rights (1976)
Article 35 (Use of Data Processing)
all citizens have the right of access to the data contained in automated data records and files concerning them as well as the right to be informed of the use for which they are intended; they are entitled to request that the contents thereof be corrected and brought up to date.
Fourth generation rights
- Fourth generation rights are intergenerational and developed upon the 90s.
- They include rights of sustainable development or connected to new applications of research in biotechnology.
- Focus on reserves to protect generation afterwards
- Focus on long-term plan/perspective
Constitution of Argentina and 4th gen. rights (1998)
Section 41
(1) All inhabitants are entitled to the right to a healthy and balanced environment fit for human development in order that productive activities shall meet present needs without endangering those of future generations; and shall have the duty to preserve it.
New rights - European Cons. vs. Italian Cons.
- European protect these new rights, unlike Italy, which does not contemplate them
- => debates whether Italian Cons. considered to be closed/open list. e.g. with no possibility of integrating new rights but on the contrarary, capable of protecting rights from 3rd and 4th generations
- However, no longer an issue due to the multi-protection nature of these new rights
- multi-protection = same right may be recognised by various docs of pseudo-constitutional nature; different national and supra-national juridicial bodies may protect same right
- => European Community (EC) provided CFREU = series of fundamental rights and freedom to be granted to all EU citizens
- => ECHR also produced a catalogue of civil and political rights
- => ECJ has vast case laws concerning fundamental rights and freedoms to protect these rights
- => issue of amending less recent Cons. is overcome
The clash of new and pre-exisiting new rights with reference to Italian Cons.
- Rights can often clash one another => if new right is protected, pre-existing rights might have to be limited. e.g. if individual’s right to privacy increased, someone else’s freedom of access to info is limited
- Art. 2: The Republic guarantees inviolable rights of man => problem lies within determining which new rights are inviolable in nature and to which extent should they belong in this category
- => have to balance different interests through resolving conflicts between different rights in case laws
Classification of basic rights
- Individual rights;
- Rights of the Public Sphere;
- Social rights;
- Economicrights;
- Political rights.
Classifications of individual rights
- Personal Freedom;
- Personal Domicile;
- Freedom of Correspondence and Information;
- Freedom of Movement, Residence and Expatriation.
Personal Freedom
Art. 13 Italian Const.
- “Personal liberty is inviolable.”
- The law establishes maximum length of preventative detention
- To protect this freedom, it is achieved through 2 instruments:
- constitutional statutory
- jurisdictional limits
- No one may be detained, inspected, or searched nor otherwise subjected to any restriction of personal liberty except by order of the Judiciary stating a reason and only in such cases and in such manner as provided by the law. (statutory limit)
- In exceptional circumstances and under such conditions of necessity and urgency as shall conclusively be defined by the law, the police may take provisional measures that shall be referred within 48 hours to the Judiciary for validation and which, in default of such validation in the following 48 hours, shall be revoked and considered null and void. Any act of physical and moral violence against a person subjected to restriction of personal liberty shall be punished. (jurisdictional limit)
- => forces of public sec. and police must be given specific powers of arrest + criminal courts must have power to apprehend and sentence someone to prison
Personal Domicile
- One of inviolable rights
- given individual’s physical integrity is protected => spaces where his activities are carried out are also deemed worthy of protection
- also include personal transportation. e.g. cars
- Art. 14 extended it to office, hotel rooms,…etc despite having no ownership because domicile represents “the person’s spatial protection”
- Statutory limit: “special laws shall regulate verifications and inspections for reasons of public health, safety or for economic and fiscal reasons”
Freedom of Correspondence and Information
- Correspondence refers to all messages an individual directs to another in any form whatsoever => broad terms because means, contents and form substantially differ each time
- Necessary requisite = presence of one/more well-defined recipients
- Art. 15:
- “Freedom and confidentiality of correspondence and of every other form of communication is inviolable. (statutory lim)
- Limitations may only be imposed by judicial decision stating the reasons and in accordance with the guarantees provided by the law.” (jurisdictional lim)
- However. Art.15 does not provide any form of preventative intervention on part of police authorities, not even under exceptional circumstances
- Rights can be limited only in presence of another imperative constitutional interest
- Question whether it protects those intended to be secret or those addressed to a particular person that are not secret
- => freedom of correspondence is intended in both its active and passive forms; both sender and recipient enjoy this freedom because it means right to send and receive without external interference
Freedom of Movement, Residence and Expatriation
- Art. 16:
- “Every citizen shall have the right to travel and reside freely in any part of the national territory”
- “Every citizen shall be free to leave the territory of the Republic and re-enter it”
- Art. 35.4:
- “The Republic shall recognise the freedom to emigrate, save for such limitations as are established by law for the common good” (law can only limit expatriation for the common good => statutory limit)
- To safeguard these freedoms, statutory limits are reinforced given the fact that restrictions can only be imposed by law and only for reasons of public health/safety
Classifications of rights of public sphere
- Freedom of Assembly;
- Freedom of Association;
- Freedom of Religion and Creed;
- Freedom of Expression.
Constitution guarantees freedoms include those actions an individual carries out in the public sphere so as to ensure everyone can take part in the civil society, political arena and mgmt of the common good