8.1 Valve Replacement for Urgent Surgery Flashcards
You are asked to see a 63-year-old woman requiring hemiarthroplasty.
She was found on the floor by her husband earlier that day and had sustained a
fracture of neck of femur.
Past Medical History Rheumatic heart disease diagnosed when she was about 30 years of age,
and 2 years ago she had aortic and mitral valve replacements.
She also had two strokes many years ago with no residual neurological
deficit. Before the fracture, she was walking with a Zimmer frame but would
get breathless after 100 yards when she would have to stop and ‘take a
breath
Social History
She gave up smoking 10 years ago after having smoked most of her life.
She drinks socially and does not indulge in illicit drugs.
Drugs
Spironolactone 25 mg oD Bumetanide 1 mg oD
Lisinopril 5 mg oD Digoxin 125 mcg oD
Warfarin (variable dose over the week) Paracetamol and Tramadol prn
on examination Awake and alert
Respiratory rate: 30/min
Saturation: 94% on high flow oxygen
Heart rate: 85/min
Blood pressure: 110/70 mmHg
BMI: 38.8
Raised JVP
Reduced air entry bilaterally with bibasal crepitations
investigations Hb 10.1 g/dL (13–16) Na 128 mmol/L (137–145)
WCC 3.0 × 109/L (4–11) K 4.8 mmol/L (3.6–5.0)
Platelets 242 × 109/L (140–400) Urea 12 mmol/L (1.7–8.3)
PCV 0.35 (0.38–0.56) Creat 150 umol/L (62–124)
MCV 88 femto Litres (80–100)
MCH 30 pico grams (26–34) INR 3.6 (0.8–1.2)
summarise the case.
What are the pertinent
features?
This is a relatively young obese patient who sustained a fracture of her neck
of femur, the circumstances of which are unknown but could be linked to an
acute event as this woman has multiple comorbidities.
Her medical history is mainly centred on her aortic and mitral valve
replacements, which occurred 2 years ago and she is now presenting with
clinical signs of cardiac failure and renal impairment for which she is treated.
She is on two types of diuretics, digoxin, ACE inhibitors, and warfarin. She
also suffered from two CVAs in the past.
- Two metallic valves
- Cardiac failure
- Renal impairment
- Obesity
- Correction of high INR
- Bridging therapy during surgery
- High-risk case
some statistics regards to hip #
70 000 to 75 000 hip fractures per year in the UK
Mortality: 10% at one month, 20% at three months, 30% at one year.
This is linked to the fact that neck of femur (NoF) fractures occur very often
following a fall due to an ‘event’ (i.e. atrial fibrillation (AF), cerebrovascular
accident (CVA), sick sinus syndrome).
What are the consequences of obesity?
- Anatomically
* Difficult IV access
* Difficult airway
* Increased risk of aspiration
* Difficult procedures such as spinal, epidural, and any regional technique - Physiologically
- Associated diseases: Diabetes and ischaemic heart disease.
- Increased risk of DVT, CVA, fatty liver disease
Increased blood loss
What are the consequences of obesity?
Physiological
- Increased oxygen demand and CO2 production
- Reduced FRC, chronic hypoxaemia, and hypoxic pulmonary
vasoconstriction with increased pulmonary pressures leading to
right-sided cardiac failure. In her case this is compounded by left-sided
cardiac failure linked to her valve replacements. - Obstructive sleep apnoea
- Hypertension (her BP is normal but she is on antihypertensives. In
addition, her cardiac failure would not generate high blood pressures)
Associated diseases: Diabetes and ischaemic heart disease.
Increased risk of DVT, CVA, fatty liver disease
Increased blood los
talk through the blood results.
Her preliminary investigations show that she is anaemic (normocytic and
normochromic), has low sodium, raised urea, and an elevated creatinine.
The most striking is her INR which is 3.6.
Looking at the results, what are the potential causes, in
this particular case, for a low sodium, raised urea, and low haemoglobin?
- Hyponatraemia due to cardiac failure with subsequent fluid retention and
diuretics. - Raised urea due partly to dehydration but is also indicative in this case of
impaired renal function (creatinine 150). - The reason for her low haemoglobin is multi-factorial including blood loss
from the fracture site but also chronic loss due to red cell damage by the
valves and chronic insensitive loss as she is on warfarin.
What do the cXR and
ecG show?
cXR
Cardiomegaly
Sternotomy wires
Two metallic valves—mitral and aortic valves
Bilateral increased lung markings
Alveolar oedema
Kerley B lines
___________________________
ECG
Sinus rhythm rate 85/min
Wide QRS complexes keeping with LBBB
Left axis deviation
QRS fragmentation in V4–5
How to recognise left axis deviation
Three Lead analysis
QRS is POSITIVE (dominant R wave) in Lead I
QRS is NEGATIVE (dominant S wave) in leads II, III and aVF
Causes
Left anterior fascicular block
Left bundle branch block
Left ventricular hypertrophy
How would you identify these prosthetic valves as mitral and aortic?
Localising cardiac prosthetic valves can be difficult. The best strategy that
can be employed to aid in characterising the type of prosthetic valve involves
assessing the location of the valve and then determining the orientation and
direction of flow (most accurate).
Location
on the frontal chest radiograph (either the AP or PA view), draw a
longitudinal line through the mid sternal body and intersect it by a sagittal
line.
The aortic valve should overlie the intersection of these two lines, and
the mitral valve will lie in the lower left quadrant (the patient’s left).
Direction of flow
If the direction of flow is from inferior to superior (towards the aorta), then an
aortic valve is likely. If the direction of flow is from superior to inferior (towards
the apex) in the left chest, then the valve is likely a mitral valve.
What further investigations would you request prior to going to theatre?
- Group and save, cross match blood and blood products
- Liver function tests as high BMI and potential right-sided cardiac failure
- Echocardiogram prior to cardiology opinion
What will an ECHO show?
An echocardiogram will provide:
- Qualitative assessment:
Establish the integrity of the valves and the gradients as well as any
regurgitation.
The quality of the ventricular function, establishing any diastolic (ventricular
compliance) and systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction). - Quantitative assessment:
Atrial and ventricular measurements
Filling pressures
Ejection fraction
Valve dimensions
Discuss the specific benefits of the various drugs the patient takes.
- Lisinopril—
inhibits angiotensin-converting enzyme
=
decreases the formation of Angiotensin II
->
decreased sympathetic activity,
=
reverses myocardial and vascular remodeling - Spironolactone—
mineralocorticoid receptor blockade -> natriuresis,
diuresis,
K retention, and
also decreases the myocardial collagen
formation and endothelial dysfunction
- Bumetanide—loop diuretic for symptom control
- Digoxin—rate control if patient is in atrial fibrillation
- Warfarin—for thromboprophylaxis
What should the patient’s normal INR be?
The presence of mechanical mitral valve calls for a maintenance of INR
2.5–3.5; but the history of CVAs while on warfarin warrants an INR of 3–4.
target inR
* 2–3 for
DVT prophylaxis, treatment of pulmonary embolus (PE), transient
ischaemic attack (TIA), and AF with high risk of embolisation.
- 2.5–3.5 for mechanical mitral valve or aortic valve
with additional risk factors. - 3.0–4.0 for mechanical valve and
systemic embolism despite therapeutic
INR of 2.5–3.5.
What INR is considered safe for a hemiarthroplasty?
How would you correct this patient’s high inR?
An INR of 1.5 is considered safe for surgery in these patients.
Correction is required for surgery,
but this has to be achieved for as short a period of time
as possible due to the high risk of thromboembolism.
Base your answer on the way warfarin works
(i.e. how it competes with vitamin K in the synthesis of
factors II, VII, IX, and X and is highly protein bound).
- Vitamin K
- PCC
- FFP
Vitamin K
5–10 mg IV, takes 4 to 8 hours to work and will interfere
with anticoagulation for a long time.