8.1 | The Organization of Knowledge Flashcards
1
Q
Concepts and Categories
A
- concept: the mental representation of an object, event, or idea
- categories: clusters of interrelated concepts
- categorization: the process of forming these groups
2
Q
Classical Categories: Definitions and Rules
A
- classical categorization: this theory claims that objects or events are categorized according to a certain set of rules or by a specific set of features
- we use a variety of cognitive processes in determining which objects fit which category
-
graded membership: the observation that some concepts appear to make better category members than others
- sentence-verification technique: experiments in which volunteers wait for a sentence to appear in front of them on a computer screen and respond as fast as they can with a yes or no answer
- e.g. “A sparrow is a bird” or “A penguin is a bird”
- these experiments show us that some members of a category are recognized faster than others
3
Q
Prototypes: Categorization by Comparison
A
- prototypes: mental representations of an average category member
- no rules or definitions are involved, just a set of similarities in overall shape and function
- the main advantage of prototypes is that they help explain why some category members make better examples than others
4
Q
Networks and Hierarchies
A
- semantic network: an interconnected set of nodes (or concepts) and the links that join them to form a category
- nodes: are circles that represent concepts
- links: connect nodes together to represent the structure of a category as well as the relationships among different categories
- priming: when seeing one word makes connected nodes in the network more likely to become activated
- e.g. it’s easier to identify the word “oranges” from the category “fruit” after seeing the word “apple” vs. an unrelated word “elephant”
- semantic networks are organized in a hierarchy
- the basic level category is located in the middle row of figure 8.3 (where birds and fish are)
- basic-level categories are the terms used most often in conversation
- easiest to pronounce
- level at which prototypes exist
- level at which most thinking occurs
- e.g. you would most likely say “There’s a bird in your yard” and not animal or robin, as the first would indicate confusion and the second suggests there’s something special/important about that classification
5
Q
Categories and the Brain
A
- initial attempts to understand how information is organized in the brain relied on patients with damage to the temporal lobes who displayed a very specific set of symptoms
-
category specific visual agnosia (or CSVA): these patients had trouble identifying the objects they were seeing, but could still describe them
- scientists suggested that different categories are organized in the brain based on their sensory (visual, touch, etc.) and functional features (i.e., what they are used for)
- the damage associated with CSVA differs slightly from patient to patient, making it difficult to say with any certainty that damage to a particular area will definitely result in a deficit related to a specific category
-
domain-specific hypothesis: evolutionary pressures led to the development of specialized circuits in the brain for a small group of categories that were important for survival
- one weakness of this view is that it doesn’t take into account people’s different experiences with each category
6
Q
Categorization and Experience
A
- our ability to form categories is based on our experiences
- when encountering a new item, people will select its category by retrieving the item(s) that are most similar to it from memory
- we sometimes retrieve individual features (e.g. a beaver’s tail) rather than an entire object from memory
- Norman et al. (1989): experiment where medical students were taught to diagnose different skin conditions using written rules and photographs
- when tested, medical students would rely on the photographs instead of the rules, which lead to false diagnoses
7
Q
Culture and Categories
A
- categorization is based (to some extent) on cultural learning
- linguistic relativity (or the Whorfian hypothesis): the theory that the language we use determines how we understand the world
- however, the differences in vocabulary does not necessarily lead to differences in perception