8. Use of pertinent treatment guidelines 2 Flashcards
What does section 9792.23 state regarding medical treatment guidelines?
Section 9792.23 states that the Administrative Director is responsible for adopting and incorporating by reference medical treatment guidelines commencing with section 9792.23.1.
What does section 9792.21d1 of the MTUS guidelines indicate about treatment for conditions not addressed in the MTUS?
For conditions or injuries not addressed in the MTUS treatment guidelines authorized treatment and diagnostic services shall adhere to other scientifically and evidence-based medical treatment guidelines recognized nationally by the medical community.
How are the MTUS guidelines organized in terms of their effective dates?
The MTUS guidelines are organized chronologically by their effective dates: 1. Prevention (May 1 2011) 2. General Approach to Initial Assessment and Documentation (July 25 2016) 3. Initial Approaches to Treatment (October 22 2021) 4. Work Disability Prevention and Management (April 11 2022).
What is the significance of evidence-based medical treatment guidelines as per the MTUS?
Evidence-based medical treatment guidelines are critical for ensuring that all treatment and diagnostic services provided for work-related injuries are scientifically supported and aligned with best practices recognized by the medical community.
What chapter addresses work disability prevention and management in the ACOEM guidelines?
Chapter 4 addresses Work Disability Prevention and Management which was effective as of April 11 2022.
What is the role of the Administrative Director in relation to the MTUS guidelines?
The Administrative Director adopts medical treatment guidelines and incorporates them into the MTUS ensuring that these guidelines are followed for occupational medicine practices.
What is the meaning of ‘Presumption of Correctness’ in the context of the MTUS guidelines?
The ‘Presumption of Correctness’ refers to the principle that decisions made by the Administrative Director regarding the treatment guidelines are assumed to be correct unless proven otherwise.
What burdens of proof are specified in relation to the treatment guidelines under MTUS?
The specific burdens of proof related to the treatment guidelines require that any contestation of treatment recommendations based on the guidelines must provide substantial evidence to override the presumption of correctness.
What is the ‘Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument’?
The AGREE II Instrument is a tool designed to help guideline developers and users assess the methodological rigor and transparency in which a guideline is developed.
When was the AGREE II Instrument adopted into the MTUS?
The AGREE II Instrument was adopted and incorporated by reference in May 2009.
Where can the AGREE II Instrument be accessed?
The AGREE II Instrument can be accessed from www.agreetrust.org or obtained from the Medical Unit Division of Workers’ Compensation P.O. Box 71010 Oakland CA 94612-1486 or on the DWC website at http://www.dwc.ca.gov.
What is the definition of ‘Bias’ in the context of research evaluation?
Bias refers to any tendency to influence the results of a trial or its interpretation other than the experimental intervention. Biases can stem from various factors including vested interests.
List examples of biases that can affect research results.
Examples of biases include selection bias performance bias detection bias reporting bias and publication bias.
What are the potential consequences of bias in clinical trials?
Bias can lead to inaccurate results and conclusions jeopardizing the reliability and validity of clinical guidelines and recommendations.
Explain the importance of methodological rigor in developing clinical guidelines.
Methodological rigor ensures that clinical guidelines are based on sound evidence reducing the risk of bias and enhancing the trustworthiness of the guidelines for decision-making.
What role does transparency play in guideline development?
Transparency allows stakeholders to understand the processes and decisions involved in guideline development which enhances accountability and trust in the recommendations made.
What sections of law or regulation are relevant to the definitions provided about evidence strength?
Sections 9792.25-9792.26 are relevant to the definitions provided concerning evidence strength.
What are confounding variables in research?
Confounding variables are external influences that can affect the outcome of a study potentially leading to incorrect conclusions. They can include factors such as financial interests academic interests and industry influence.
What does ‘inadequate generation of the randomization sequence’ refer to in clinical trials?
This refers to a failure in the process of creating a random sequence to assign participants to different groups in a study which can lead to biased results.
Why is inadequate concealment of allocation a problem in clinical trials?
Inadequate concealment of allocation means that researchers or participants may know which group they are assigned to introducing bias in treatment effects and potentially skewing the results.
What is the significance of selection bias in research studies?
Selection bias occurs when the participants included in a study are not representative of the larger population which can distort the results and limit the generalizability of the findings.
What does ‘lack of blinding’ mean and why is it important?
Lack of blinding refers to the absence of measures to prevent participants and researchers from knowing which interventions have been administered. This can introduce bias as expectations may influence outcomes.
What is selective outcome reporting?
Selective outcome reporting involves only publishing certain results from a study based on the significance or the favorability of those results which can lead to a biased representation of the intervention’s effectiveness.
What is meant by ‘failure to do intention-to-treat analysis’?
Failure to perform intention-to-treat analysis means not including all randomized participants in the groups they were assigned to regardless of whether they completed the intervention which can lead to biased outcomes.