8 Summary Judgment Flashcards
When might an interim application be made without notice?
- if urgent 23 PD 3(1)
- when object of order would be defeated by providing notice
- where other party not yet on court record (proceedings not yet served on D)
- insufficient time for formal notice as hearing date already fixed 23A PD 2.10
what documentation is required for an interim application?
- application notice
- written evidence - 25.3(2)
- draft order
- bundle of documents
- skeleton arguments
SfC - when is someone a ‘resident’?
Individual: habitual/normal residence ⇾ Q of fact ⇾ BOP on D !!
Companies: central management & control (usually where incorporated)
SfC CASE LAW
‘Company unable to pay’:
- Re: Unisoft Group: Co would not (as opposed to may not) be able to pay debts, at the time of application, although court can take into account what will be expected in future
- Jirehouse Capital v Beller: doesn’t mean that D has to show on a BOP that Co unable to pay ⇾ D may be able to show there is ‘reason to believe’ that Co won’t be able to pay even if Co can adduce substantial evidence to contrary
SfC: exercise of discretion - what is the court’s main consideration?
ability of respondent to comply with any order for security for costs
SfC: exercise of discretion - CASE LAW?
- Olatawura v Abiloye: court must balance injustice to C w. injustice to D
court must have regard to ‘all circumstances of the case’ ⇾ look at other factors: - Parkinson v Triplan:
SfC - What was decided in Parkinson?
main factors identified:
- whether C’s claim is bona fide (not sham);
- whether application is being used to stifle genuine claim
- delay in making application
- whether C’s want of means was brought about by D’s conduct
SfC - What was decided in Otalawura
court must balance injustice to C w. injustice to D
SfC - Parkinson - what to consider when deciding if C’s claim = bona fide (not a sham)?
e. g.:
- C has reasonably good prospect of success
- any admissions made by D w. regard to liability
SfC - what facts will court take into account when determining amount of securty?
- amount of D’s likely costs
- security given for whole action/to point in time
amount can cover costs incurred - deduction may be made for DA or possibility of settling
- amount respondent is likely to be able to raise ⇾ onus is on C to show it would be impossible (not just difficult) to comp
What procedural variations are there in a SfC (c.f. other interim applications)?
- AN should state which ground(s) /enactment applies
- evidence (normally WS) should cover:
- ground (e.g. if impecunious ground ⇾ exhibit steam to costs for likely costs to trial & accounts to show C unable to pay)
- factors in exercise of discretion
- amount of security requested
SJ - sufficient for respondent to show SOME prospect - case law
- Swain: ‘no real prospect’ doesn’t need amplification; words mean whether there is a realistic (as opposed to fanciful) prospect of success
- International Finance Corp: ‘real’ means better than merely arguable
SJ - SJ hearing is not a mini trial - case law
Swain v Hillman: not a mini-trial, but court doesn’t have to accept everything said by parties
SJ - ‘compelling reason’ examples
- if case highly complex
- significant dispute on facts ⇾ needing cross-examination
- D needs more time to investigate claim ⇾ e.g. need to contact material witnesses
- need for expert evidence to be adduced
SJ called - if obtained where C applied
JUDGMENT ON CLAIM