8 Summary Judgment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

When might an interim application be made without notice?

A
  • if urgent 23 PD 3(1)
  • when object of order would be defeated by providing notice
  • where other party not yet on court record (proceedings not yet served on D)
  • insufficient time for formal notice as hearing date already fixed 23A PD 2.10
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what documentation is required for an interim application?

A
  1. application notice
  2. written evidence - 25.3(2)
  3. draft order
  4. bundle of documents
  5. skeleton arguments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

SfC - when is someone a ‘resident’?

A

Individual: habitual/normal residence ⇾ Q of fact ⇾ BOP on D !!
Companies: central management & control (usually where incorporated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

SfC CASE LAW

A

‘Company unable to pay’:

  1. Re: Unisoft Group: Co would not (as opposed to may not) be able to pay debts, at the time of application, although court can take into account what will be expected in future
  2. Jirehouse Capital v Beller: doesn’t mean that D has to show on a BOP that Co unable to pay ⇾ D may be able to show there is ‘reason to believe’ that Co won’t be able to pay even if Co can adduce substantial evidence to contrary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

SfC: exercise of discretion - what is the court’s main consideration?

A

ability of respondent to comply with any order for security for costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

SfC: exercise of discretion - CASE LAW?

A
  1. Olatawura v Abiloye: court must balance injustice to C w. injustice to D
    court must have regard to ‘all circumstances of the case’ ⇾ look at other factors:
  2. Parkinson v Triplan:
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

SfC - What was decided in Parkinson?

A

main factors identified:

  1. whether C’s claim is bona fide (not sham);
  2. whether application is being used to stifle genuine claim
  3. delay in making application
  4. whether C’s want of means was brought about by D’s conduct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

SfC - What was decided in Otalawura

A

court must balance injustice to C w. injustice to D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

SfC - Parkinson - what to consider when deciding if C’s claim = bona fide (not a sham)?

A

e. g.:
- C has reasonably good prospect of success
- any admissions made by D w. regard to liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

SfC - what facts will court take into account when determining amount of securty?

A
  • amount of D’s likely costs
  • security given for whole action/to point in time
    amount can cover costs incurred
  • deduction may be made for DA or possibility of settling
  • amount respondent is likely to be able to raise ⇾ onus is on C to show it would be impossible (not just difficult) to comp
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What procedural variations are there in a SfC (c.f. other interim applications)?

A
  1. AN should state which ground(s) /enactment applies
  2. evidence (normally WS) should cover:
    - ground (e.g. if impecunious ground ⇾ exhibit steam to costs for likely costs to trial & accounts to show C unable to pay)
    - factors in exercise of discretion
    - amount of security requested
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

SJ - sufficient for respondent to show SOME prospect - case law

A
  1. Swain: ‘no real prospect’ doesn’t need amplification; words mean whether there is a realistic (as opposed to fanciful) prospect of success
  2. International Finance Corp: ‘real’ means better than merely arguable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

SJ - SJ hearing is not a mini trial - case law

A

Swain v Hillman: not a mini-trial, but court doesn’t have to accept everything said by parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

SJ - ‘compelling reason’ examples

A
  1. if case highly complex
  2. significant dispute on facts ⇾ needing cross-examination
  3. D needs more time to investigate claim ⇾ e.g. need to contact material witnesses
  4. need for expert evidence to be adduced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

SJ called - if obtained where C applied

A

JUDGMENT ON CLAIM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

SJ called - if obtained where D applied

A

Striking out / dismissal of claim

17
Q

SJ called - if NOT obtained

A

Dismissal of application

18
Q

What are the 4 possible hearing outcomes of SJ?

A
  1. SJ obtained where C applied ⇾ Judgment on claim:
  2. SJ obtained where D applied ⇾ Striking out / 3. Dismissal of claim:
    Dismissal of application:
  3. Conditional order: claim continues on certain conditions e.g. order sum of money to be paid into court
19
Q

What type of interim cost orders might be made?

A
  1. costs in any event
  2. costs in the case
  3. no order for costs
20
Q

How will costs be assessed if a ‘costs in any event’ order is made?

A

court will put figure on costs due ⇾ payable by losing party within 14d ⇾ ‘summary assessment’ 44.6(1)(a)