8 - Leases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the difference between a freehold estate and a leasehold estate?

A
  • A freehold estate endures for an uncertain length of time, meaning it is held indefinitely.
  • A leasehold estate is an estate of a certain or fixed duration, meaning it has a set term.
  • A leasehold estate is carved out of a freehold estate.
  • When a freehold owner grants a leasehold estate, they retain the reversion i.e., the right to future possession of the property.
  • The freehold estate and leasehold estate can exist concurrently in the same parcel of land.
  • The freehold owner can grant a lease for as long as they wish, while a tenant can only grant a sublease for a shorter term than the lease they hold.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the reasons a freehold owner may create a lease?

A

A freehold owner may create a lease for the following reasons:
- To obtain income from the property.
- To retain an interest in the property that can be sold.
- To enforce positive covenants against a successor in title to the original tenant (enforcing positive covenants against a successor in title means ensuring that future tenants are legally bound to fulfill the obligations or duties agreed upon by the original tenant in the lease.)

The landlord retains a fee simple absolute in possession (freehold), as possession is extended to include receiving rent or profits under section 205 LPA 1925.

A legal estate may exist concurrently with or subject to another legal estate, as provided by section 1(5) LPA 1925. The landlord holds a reversion, entitling them to:
- Receive the payment of rent (or profits).
- Retake physical possession once the lease ends.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is a lease capable of being a legal estate in land?

A

Yes, a lease can be a legal estate in land.

According to section 1(1)(b) LPA 1925, a lease is a term of years absolute in possession, meaning it can exist as a legal estate in land, provided it meets the necessary conditions of duration and possession.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the formalities for creating a legal lease depending on its duration?

A

Leases for more than three years:
- A deed is required to create a legal lease (s 52 LPA 1925).
- The deed must meet the criteria set out in s 1 LPMPA 1989.

The requirements for a deed are set out in s 1 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous
Provisions) Act 1989 (LPMPA 1989) which are that it must be:
* In writing;
* Clear on its face that it is a deed;
* Signed;
* Witnessed (by one witness); and
* Delivered.

Leases for three years or less:
Certain short-term leases, known as ‘parol leases’, require no formalities and can be created orally.

To be legal, such leases must meet the criteria set out in s 54(2) LPA 1925:
- The lease must be for three years or less, which includes periodic leases where the period of the lease is for three years or less (e.g., a monthly periodic lease).
- The lease must take effect in possession, meaning the tenant must have the immediate right to possess and enjoy the land.
- The tenant must pay the best rent which can be reasonably obtained, i.e., market rent.
- The landlord must not charge a fine or premium, which is a one-off capital sum (e.g., a £5,000 premium in addition to rent or instead of rent).

Leases for three years or less can also be created by deed.

Leases between three and seven years:
- Residential and commercial leases with a term between three and seven years are not considered registrable leases but can still be noted at the Land Registry against the Landlord’s title.

Leases under three years:
- No deed required and not registrable.

Leases over seven years:
- If the total is more than seven years (ie more than 364 complete weeks) the lease and/or transfer will be compulsorily registrable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When may equity intervene in the creation of a lease, and what are the required conditions for equity to recognise a lease?

A

Equity may intervene in two situations:
- When there is a contract to create or transfer a legal estate, or
- When there is an attempt to use a deed but the deed is not valid.

Conditions for equity to recognise the arrangement:
- A valid contract to create or transfer a legal estate, complying with s 2 LPMPA 1989.
- Specific performance of the contract must be available as an equitable remedy.
- Clean hands: The person seeking the remedy must not be in breach of the contract (equitable maxim: “He who seeks equity must do so with clean hands”).

Case Law Examples:
Walsh v Lonsdale (1882): The court recognised an equitable lease based on a valid contract for a seven-year lease, despite the omission of a deed. The court applied the maxim “equity regards as done that which ought to be done.”

Coatsworth v Johnson (1886-90): The court did not recognise an equitable lease because Coatsworth breached a term of the contract, thus lacking “clean hands” to seek the remedy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the status of a lease when a deed is improperly executed, as illustrated by an example where the landlord’s signature is not witnessed?

A

A lease is capable of being legal under s 1(1)(b) LPA 1925, but it must be created by deed (s 52 LPA 1925) and comply with the deed requirements set out in s 1 LPMPA 1989.

In the example where James, the freehold owner, grants a lease to Helen for five years, but his signature is not witnessed on the deed:
- This is not a valid legal lease, as it does not meet the deed requirements.
- The parol lease exception does not apply because the lease is for more than three years.

Equity may intervene:
- If there is a contract in writing and signed by both parties, and the contract complies with s 2 LPMPA 1989, and there are no issues of bad faith (i.e., clean hands), equity may recognise the arrangement as an equitable lease.
- In this case, the lease is an equitable lease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the three essential requirements for a lease to be valid?

A

The lease must meet the following three essential characteristics:
1. Duration: The estate must be for a duration permitted for a leasehold estate.
2. Exclusive possession: The grant must give the tenant exclusive possession of the land.
3. Correct formalities: The grant must meet the required formalities.

The court considers the substance of the agreement, not just its form. A lease is created even if it is labelled as a licence (Street v Mountford [1985]).

If one or more of the essential characteristics of a lease are missing, then all that has been created is a license.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the key differences between a lease and a licence?

A

Lease:
- Creates a proprietary right in land that can bind a purchaser of the reversion (e.g., freehold estate).
- The lease can be assigned to a new tenant, allowing it to be bought and sold, and the lease continues to exist.
- Occupiers with the benefit of a lease may benefit from a range of statutory protections.
- Enforceable in rem - the right can be recovered and the individual party does not have to settle for damages. The right to possess can be recovered for the duration of the lease if a tenant is deprived of their right.

Licence:
- Creates only a personal right (permission) to use the land that does not bind the purchaser of the reversion (e.g., freehold estate).
- A licence cannot be assigned, and a new licence is required if the identity of the parties changes.
- Occupiers with the benefit of a licence do not benefit from statutory protections.
- Enforceable in personam.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the permitted duration requirement for a lease entail?

A

A lease must have a definable beginning and a definable end, creating a fixed ascertainable period.

The lease can either be:
- For a fixed term: A lease for a specified period.
- Periodic: A lease that automatically renews at regular intervals.
For example, a lease for 1,000 yeats ia valid because it is a certain term with a start and end.

Invalid leases include:
- A lease for the duration of the Second World War was not valid because the duration was not fixed (Lace v Chantler [1944]).
- A lease that continued until the land was needed for road widening was invalid as it lacked a fixed term (Prudential Assurance v London Residuary Body [1992]).

Leases for life create a term of 90 years, ending on the tenant’s death or as otherwise provided for in the agreement (s 49(6) LPA 1925).

Break clauses are allowed, meaning the lease has a fixed ascertainable period, even if there is a right to terminate early.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the characteristic of exclusive possession in a lease entail?

A

Exclusive possession is the ability for the tenant to exercise control over the land:
- The tenant has the right to exclude all others, including the landlord, from the land.
- Exclusive possession extends beyond mere exclusive occupation, which is the characteristic of a licence.
- The tenant does not need to be physically in occupation to enjoy exclusive possession.

If a statement says that exclusive possession is not granted, but the occupier is given general control over the property, this may still constitute exclusive possession and create a lease.

This is equally applicable to businesses and residential properties to show that they have a lease rather than a licence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the key factor that determines whether an agreement is a lease or a licence?

A

Exclusive possession is the determining factor:
- If there is no exclusive possession, the agreement will only create a licence.
- The landowner may deliberately deny exclusive possession to prevent the occupier from acquiring the benefits of a lease, such as security of tenure.
- Even if the landowner retains a key, this does not negate exclusive possession. However, if the occupier does not have general control of the land, exclusive possession does not exist.

Examples:
Wells v Kingston upon Hull (1875): The ship owners used a dry dock but lacked general control over the dock, so the agreement was considered a licence, despite the word “let” being used.

Westminster City Council v Clarke [1992]: Mr Clarke was placed in a hostel under a “Licence to Occupy”. The agreement had conditions that restricted exclusive possession (e.g., Mr Clarke could be required to share accommodation, and the council could enter at any time amongst other things). As a result, the agreement was deemed a licence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the nature of service occupancies and how do they relate to leases or licences?

A

Service occupancies occur when an employer allows an employee to live in the employer’s accommodation for the better performance of their duties. This creates a licence, not a lease.
- The service occupancy terminates when the employment ends.
- This arrangement is relevant for workers such as farm workers, caretakers, and members of the police and armed forces.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does the concept of exclusive possession apply in flat-sharing agreements?

A

Flat-sharing agreements can either create a lease or a licence, depending on the agreement’s terms and the parties’ intentions regarding exclusive possession.

To determine this, the courts will always look at the substance of a sharing clause.

Examples:
AG Securities v Vaughan: The court ruled that the agreements were independent of each other and did not provide exclusive possession to any one occupant. The bedrooms were occupied on a rolling basis, with different rents and dates, and therefore, the agreements created licences, not leases.

Antoniades v Villiers: The court found the agreements to be interdependent and intended to create joint and exclusive possession of the flat by the couple. Despite a clause allowing others to share the flat, the court ruled this clause was a sham because no one would reasonably expect it to be exercised. As a result, the court held that a lease had been created.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is the payment of rent an essential characteristic for a lease to be valid?

A

The payment of rent is not an essential characteristic of a lease.

However, the payment of rent may support the view that the parties intended to create a formal landlord-tenant relationship, rather than an informal relationship based on family or friendship.

Example:
Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1989]: In this case, the payment of rent was used to indicate the parties’ intention to establish a formal landlord-tenant relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can it be determined whether occupiers of a property have a lease arrangement or are individual licensees?

A
  • If the occupiers together have the right to exclude all others, including the landowner, there is a presumption that they have a lease arrangement.
  • The key issue is whether the occupiers have one single lease (a “joint tenancy”) or several individual leases.
  • If the occupiers do not have all four unities (possession, interest, time, and title), they cannot have a joint tenancy and are treated as individual licensees sharing the property.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is required to satisfy the “unity of interest” principle in a joint tenancy?

A
  • All occupiers must have a leasehold interest for the same term, under the same conditions.
  • All occupiers must be jointly liable for the rent.
  • Joint liability means that if one occupier leaves, the remaining occupiers are liable for the full rent, not just an individual share of it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does the “unity of time” require in a joint tenancy?

A

All of the occupiers’ interests must start at the same time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is required to satisfy the “unity of title” principle in a joint tenancy?

A

All occupiers’ interests must derive from the same document or from separate but identical documents that are interdependent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What does the “unity of possession” mean in the context of joint tenancies?

A
  • All occupiers must be entitled to occupy the whole of the premises.
  • No one occupier has exclusive use of any part of the property.
  • If the occupiers can show that each has exclusive possession of a specific part of the property, they may have individual leases rather than a joint tenancy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What happens if occupiers fail to meet all four unities required for a joint tenancy?

A

If the occupiers do not have all four unities (possession, interest, time, and title), they cannot have a joint tenancy.

If neither a joint tenancy nor individual tenancy exists, the occupiers will only be considered individual licensees sharing the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are the characteristics of a fixed-term lease, and how is it created?

A
  • A fixed-term lease is a contract that grants the tenant the right to occupy the premises for a specific, fixed period.
  • The term of the lease can vary and be set for any duration (e.g., one day, six months, 10 years, or 99 years).
  • The tenant agrees to pay rent and fulfil other obligations during the fixed term.
  • The lease will expire automatically at the end of the specified period unless extended or renewed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is a periodic lease, and how does it differ from a fixed-term lease?

A
  • A periodic lease, also known as a “periodic tenancy,” runs from one period to the next until terminated by notice from either party.
  • Each period automatically renews at the end of the previous period.
  • The length of each period is determined by the rent payment frequency (e.g., monthly, yearly).
  • It is not a fixed-term lease because it continues until one party terminates it through notice.
  • A legal periodic lease can arise when the actions of the parties suggest an intention to create a lease. Where the period of the lease is for three years
    or less, the lease will be legal if it meets the criteria in s 54(2) LPA 1925 for a parol lease.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How is a legal periodic lease created, and what are the conditions for a valid parol lease?

A

A legal periodic lease is created when the parties’ actions indicate an intention to create a lease.

For leases of three years or less, a periodic lease will be legal if it meets the conditions of a parol lease under s 54(2) LPA 1925.

These conditions are:
- The lease must be in possession, meaning the tenant must occupy the property immediately.
- The rent must be the best rent reasonably obtainable.
- There must be no fine or premium involved.
- The lease can be created without a deed.

If rent is paid monthly, the lease is a monthly periodic tenancy.

Example:
Katie is the freehold owner of 32 Mabel Grove (‘the Property’). Katie allows Sally into occupation of the Property and Sally pays a rent of £600 per calendar month. Sally has now been in occupation for five years

Has a legal lease been created?
- The lease term is monthly, as rent is paid on a monthly basis.
- Sally has exclusive possession of the property.
- The rent (£600 per month) is considered to be reasonably obtainable, meeting the conditions for a legal lease.
- There is no fine or premium involved.

As the lease is for three years or less, the lease qualifies as a parol lease under s 54(2) LPA 1925, making it a legal monthly periodic tenancy for Sally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the relationship between a landlord and tenant in a lease, and what does a lease represent?

A
  • A lease is essentially a contract that creates an estate in land.
  • It represents the agreement between the landlord and tenant, detailing their respective rights and obligations during the lease term.
  • The contractual terms within the lease are referred to as covenants.
  • Lease covenants are agreed upon through negotiation between the landlord and tenant (or their solicitors).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What information is typically included at the beginning of a lease, and how are terms like ‘Premises’ or ‘Insured Risks’ defined for interpretation?

A

Most leases begin with the date of the lease, the names of the landlord and tenant, and their addresses.

A well-drafted lease includes an interpretation and definitions section that clarifies specific terms like:
- ‘Premises’
- ‘Insured Risks’
- ‘Common Parts’ of a building.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What are the operative provisions in a lease concerning ‘Demise and Rents,’ and what do they establish?

A

The operative provisions in a lease typically cover the Demise and Rents sections.

Here, the landlord demises (grants) the lease of the premises to the tenant.

This grant is for a specified term and is made in consideration of:
- Rent paid by the tenant, and
- Covenants entered into by the tenant.

This section establishes the essential obligations and conditions under which the landlord transfers possession rights to the tenant for the lease term.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What matters are typically covered in the ‘Provisos, Agreements and Declarations’ section of a lease?

A

This section is a miscellaneous part of the lease that covers several important issues, including:
- Forfeiture: The landlord’s right to end the lease early if the tenant breaches it.
- Damage and destruction by insured risks: Clauses explaining what happens if the premises are damaged or destroyed due to an insured risk.
- Exclusion of security of tenure provisions: Clauses regarding the exclusion of security of tenure rights under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What are ‘Rights Granted’ in a lease, and what might they include?

A

The ‘Rights Granted’ section outlines specific rights given to the tenant, which are necessary for full use of the premises. These may include:
- Right of way: Access rights to enter the premises.
- Right to park cars in a nearby car park.

Easements for using other parts of the building, such as:
- Access to common parts of the building.
- Use of conducting media (e.g., utilities infrastructure) for essential services.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What are ‘Rights Excepted and Reserved’ in a lease, and why might they be needed?

A

The ‘Rights Excepted and Reserved’ section allows the landlord to retain certain rights over the tenant’s premises. This is often to facilitate:
- Access for maintenance, repairs, or improvements to other areas of the property.
- Running cables or other utilities through the tenant’s space to service other parts of the building.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What provisions might a lease include regarding ‘Rent Review’ and ‘Service Charge’?

A

Rent Review: Mechanism for reviewing the rent at regular intervals to adjust it, typically to reflect current market conditions.

Service Charge: A sum charged by the landlord to cover the costs of services provided to tenants in a property, such as maintenance and repair of exteriors and common areas (excluding areas the tenant has agreed to maintain).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is required for the execution of a lease, and what are the exceptions for short leases?

A

Both the landlord and tenant, along with any guarantor, must execute the lease according to normal attestation rules.

For a lease to be legal, it must generally be granted by deed under LPA 1925, s 52, unless it qualifies as a short lease (3 years or less) under LPA 1925, s 54(2), in which case it does not need to be granted by deed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is a guarantor’s covenant in a lease?

A

An individual or company guarantor may also be a party to the lease and will covenant to guarantee payments that must be made under the lease and the performance of any other obligations so that if the tenant defaults in payment, the landlord is able to call upon the guarantor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What are ‘Prescribed Lease Clauses,’ and when must they be included in a lease?

A

‘Prescribed Lease Clauses’ are specific clauses that must be included at the start of a lease when it is registrable under the Land Registration Act 2002.

These clauses streamline lease registration with the Land Registry and typically cover:
- Date of lease
- Landlord’s title number
- Parties involved
- Term of the lease
- Easements granted and reserved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What are the key covenants typically found in a lease?

A

Tenant’s covenants:
- Payment of rent
- Contribution towards insurance
- Repair obligations
- Alterations to the property
- Alienation, i.e., subletting or assigning the lease
- Use of premises,

Landlord’s covenants:
- Quiet enjoyment, ensuring tenant’s peaceful possession of the property
- Insurance of the property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What covenants are implied in the absence of an express obligation from the landlord?

A

Implied covenants on the part of the landlord include:
- Quiet enjoyment (ensuring tenant’s possession is not disturbed)
- Obligations in respect of the fitness of the property, which ensure the property is fit for habitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What is meant by the covenant of quiet enjoyment in a lease?

A

The quiet enjoyment covenant means that the tenant’s lawful possession of the land will not be substantially interfered with by the landlord’s actions

It does not require the absence of all noise, but regular excessive noise may be considered substantial interference.

Residential tenants are further protected by the Protection from Eviction Act (PEA) 1977, which prevents landlords from unlawfully depriving tenants of their occupation.

Any acts that interfere with a residential tenant’s peace or comfort and are done with the intention of forcing them to vacate the property are offences under the PEA 1977.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What are the landlord’s obligations in relation to the fitness of the property, and when are they liable?

A

Under s 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, the landlord has specific obligations to maintain the fitness of the property in a dwelling-house:
- To keep the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house in repair.
- To ensure that installations for the supply of water, gas, electricity, and sanitation are in proper working order.
- To keep installations for space heating and water heating in proper working order.

The landlord is only liable for disrepair once the issue has been notified to them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What are the main considerations for a tenant’s repair covenant in a lease, and what does it entail?

A

A tenant’s repair covenant generally requires the tenant to maintain the premises as a reasonably minded owner would, based on the following factors (as established in Proudfoot v Hart [1890]):
- Character and type of premises at the start of the lease, unaffected by any changes in the neighbourhood.
- Age of the premises.
- Express words of the repair covenant.

A repair covenant obligates the tenant to restore the premises if they were out of repair at the start. This can be a significant burden if the property is already in disrepair. They must also keep the property in repair throughout the term of the lease.

A repair obligation can be limited by a schedule of condition, which is a document (usually including photographs and descriptions by a surveyor) that records the premises’ state at the start of the lease. When this is annexed to a lease, it allows the tenant to state that they are not required to improve the condition of the premises beyond what is documented in the schedule.

39
Q

What is the distinction between ‘repair’ and ‘renewal’ under a tenant’s repair covenant, and what factors determine this?

A

A tenant’s covenant to repair does not require the renewal of the entire property. Distinguishing between repair and renewal depends on:
- Scope of the work: If it involves replacing a subsidiary part, it is repair.
- Extent of replacement: If the work involves replacing the whole or a substantial part, it is considered renewal.

Case Example:
- In Lurcott v Wakely [1911], rebuilding the front wall of an old house was classed as repair because it restored a part rather than the entirety.

40
Q

What are ‘alteration covenants’ in a lease, and what restrictions apply to a tenant’s right to alter the premises?

A

Alteration covenants typically allow the tenant to make alterations, but subject to any specific terms in the lease. If no restrictions are stated, the tenant can freely make alterations, except for changes that would devalue the premises under the legal doctrine of waste.

41
Q

What are ‘user covenants’ in a lease, and what is the landlord’s interest in them?

A

A user covenant in a lease specifies permitted uses for the premises, such as residential or a particular business purpose. The landlord includes this covenant to control how the tenant uses the property to ensure it aligns with the landlord’s interests or with the nature of the property.

42
Q

What is the difference between an assignment and a sublease in terms of the tenant’s alienation covenant?

A

Alienation refers to the disposal of the existing (and remaining) leasehold estate by the tenant.

Assignment:
- The tenant passes all of their interest under the lease to a new tenant. I.e., the transfer by the tenant of the remainder of their lease to another party.
- The tenant steps out of the picture, and the new tenant steps into the shoes of the old tenant.
- No new lease is created; the existing lease simply changes hands.

Sublease:
- A lesser estate is carved out of the superior estate, creating a new lease. I.e., granting a lease out of its own lease.
- The new lease must be for a shorter duration than the head lease.
- The tenant retains their interest in the head lease, and the subtenant holds a separate lease.

43
Q

What does alienation mean in the context of a lease and what are the different types of alienation?

A

Alienation refers to the tenant disposing of their lease by one of the following methods:
- Assignment
- Sub-lease
- Mortgage/charge
- Parting with possession/occupation

In the case of assignment, the tenant transfers all of their remaining interest in the lease to a new tenant (the assignee). No new lease is created; the existing lease simply changes hands.

The parties to a lease have contractual freedom regarding what is permitted in relation to alienation. However, legislation influences the interpretation of lease provisions, depending on the nature of the alienation covenant.

44
Q

What is the relationship between a head landlord and a subtenant in a lease agreement?

A

In a sublease arrangement:
- There is no direct relationship between the head landlord and the subtenant, meaning the landlord cannot directly enforce covenants in the head lease against the subtenant.
- The head landlord is generally unable to enforce positive covenants directly against the subtenant but can enforce restrictive covenants under LTCA, s 3(5) against any owner or occupier.

45
Q

How can tenants control a subtenant’s compliance with covenants in a sublease?

A

To manage a subtenant’s compliance with covenants:
- Tenants often include a provision in the sublease that requires the subtenant to observe and perform covenants from the head lease, indirectly protecting the landlord’s interests.
- If a breach by the subtenant occurs, the tenant remains liable to the head landlord, providing motivation for the tenant to enforce these covenants on the subtenant.

However, landlords will not be able to enforce directly against any subtenant any positive covenants.

46
Q

What happens to a sublease if the head lease is forfeited?

A

If the head lease is forfeited, the sublease is automatically terminated as well. However:
- The subtenant may be able to make a claim for relief to avoid immediate termination.
- The risk of forfeiture encourages the subtenant to adhere to the covenants in the head lease.

47
Q

How can a landlord ensure enforceability of covenants against a subtenant?

A

To directly enforce covenants against a subtenant, a prudent landlord may, including positive covenants:
- Require that the subtenant enter into direct covenants with the landlord as a condition of consent to the sublease.
- This creates a contractual relationship between the landlord and subtenant, allowing the landlord to enforce covenants based on contract law.

48
Q

What are the different types of alienation covenants in a lease?

A

Open contract position: If the lease does not contain a covenant against alienation, the tenant has complete freedom to deal with the lease as they wish.

Absolute prohibition: A covenant where the tenant is absolutely prohibited from dealing with the lease (e.g., assignment, subletting, or any other form of alienation).

Qualified covenant: A covenant where the tenant is not allowed to assign or otherwise deal with the lease without the landlord’s consent.

Fully qualified covenant: A covenant where the tenant is not allowed to assign or otherwise deal with the lease without the landlord’s consent, and such consent must not be unreasonably withheld.

49
Q

How does Section 19 of the Landlord and Tenant Act (LTA) 1927 affect alienation covenants in leases?

A

Section 19 of the LTA 1927 translates qualified covenants into fully qualified covenants, meaning the landlord cannot unreasonably withhold consent to alienation (e.g., assignment, subletting, charging, or parting with possession).

Absolute prohibitions are unaffected by this provision.

50
Q

How does the Landlord and Tenant Act (LTA) 1988 and Section 19(1A) of the LTA 1927 affect alienation covenants?

A

Landlord and Tenant Act (LTA) 1988 requires the landlord to:
- Give consent unless it is reasonable not to do so.
- Provide written notice of their decision, including any conditions.
- Provide written reasons for refusal if consent is withheld.

These obligations apply to assignments, underlettings, charging, or parting with possession and cannot be unreasonably delayed.

Section 19(1A) of the LTA 1927 (post-1 January 1996):
Enables the original landlord and tenant of a non residential lease to agree in advance on the:
- Circumstances in which the landlord may withhold consent to an assignment.
- Conditions subject to which consent to assign will be given.

These circumstances and conditions are not subject to the reasonableness test set out in the LTA 1988.

A common condition is that the tenant provides an authorised guarantee agreement (AGA) as a condition for the landlord’s consent to any assignment.

51
Q

What are the two sets of rules governing how covenants in leases are enforced?

A

The rules depend on when the lease was created (not assigned):
- Old leases: Leases created before 1 January 1996.
- New leases: Leases created after 1 January 1996.

The Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act (LT(C)A) 1995 includes provisions that apply retrospectively to old leases.

52
Q

What are the key aspects of enforcing covenants in old leases (granted before 1996)?

A

Liability of the original tenant:
- There is a privity of contract between the original landlord and the original tenant.
- Parties may covenant on behalf of themselves and their successors in title.
- Even if not expressed, continuing obligations are implied under s 79 LPA 1925.

If the original tenant (T1) assigns the lease to T2:
- T1 remains liable for the burden of the covenants.
- T1 ceases to benefit from the covenants.
- T1’s contractual liability lasts for the duration of the lease.

53
Q

What is the liability of an assignee (T2) when a lease is assigned and how does privity of estate apply for old leases?

A

When the original tenant (T1) assigns the lease to an assignee (T2), a relationship of privity of estate exists between the landlord and T2.

Privity of estate means T2 has:
- Exclusive possession of the property,
- Is liable to pay rent,
- Holds the lease, and
- Is the party in whom the lease is vested, as established in Spencer’s Case (1583).

T2 is liable for breaches of real covenants, which are covenants that touch and concern the land. These include both positive and restrictive covenants.

The test for real covenants from P & A Swift Investments v Combined English Stores Group plc [1989] AC 632:
1. A covenant must benefit only the dominant owner for the time being, so that if separated from the land, it ceases to be advantageous.
2. The covenant must affect the nature, quality, mode of use, or value of the land.
3. The covenant must not be personal, i.e., it cannot be given to a specific dominant owner only.

Examples of real covenants:
- To pay rent, rates, or taxes,
- To repair the property,
- Relating to the use of the property.

A personal obligation (e.g., giving the landlord a rose every month) is not a real covenant and cannot be enforced under privity of estate.

54
Q

How is the liability of an assignee (T2) limited and what impact does privity of contract have for old leases?

A
  • T2 is only liable for breaches of covenants under privity of estate for as long as they hold the lease, i.e., while they occupy and pay rent.
  • Their liability ends when they no longer hold the lease.
  • It is common for the landlord to require each assignee to covenant directly with them to observe the covenants in the lease.
  • This creates a relationship of privity of contract between the landlord and all assignees, not just between the original landlord and tenant.
55
Q

What happens if T2 (assignee) fails to comply with an obligation in a lease, and who can the landlord pursue for breach for old leases?

A

If T2 (the assignee) defaults on an obligation, the landlord has the option to pursue:
- T1 (the original tenant) via privity of contract,
- T2 via privity of estate, or
- Both T1 and T2.

The landlord’s action depends on the nature of the default and the relationship of privity with each party.

Example:
In 1994, Loretta, the freehold owner, granted a 50- year lease to Toby (by deed). In 1997, Toby assigned the lease to Alison (by deed and with Loretta’s consent). Last year, Alison assigned the lease to Gwen (by deed and with Loretta’s consent). Gwen has failed to comply with the covenants in the lease.

Who is liable? -
- Toby (the original tenant) remains liable under privity of contract because the lease was created in 1994, which is considered an old lease.
- Gwen (the most recent assignee) is liable under privity of estate, as she is currently the tenant in occupation of the lease.

56
Q

How can the original tenant recover costs if they are sued for a breach they did not commit for old leases?

A

The original tenant can recover costs in the following ways:

At common law: The original tenant can sue the current tenant in possession at the time of the breach (e.g., Moule v Garrett (1872) LR Ex 101), as the person who discharges another’s liability can seek to recover the amount paid from the person whose liability was discharged.

On the indemnity covenant: If the lease includes an express indemnity covenant in the deed of assignment, the original tenant can take action against the assignee.

Implied indemnity covenant: In the absence of an express indemnity covenant, one is implied by s 77 LPA 1925 (unregistered title) and Sch 12, para 20 Land Registration Act 2002 (registered title). This indemnity requires the assignee to observe and perform the tenant’s covenants and make good any damage caused by future breaches.

57
Q

What happens when the reversion is sold, and how do covenants transfer to the new landlord for old leases?

A

When the reversion is sold, the benefits and burdens of the landlord’s covenants that touch and concern the land are transferred to the new landlord under ss 141 and 142 LPA 1925.

The new landlord can pursue:
- The original tenant (via privity of contract)
- The current tenant (via privity of estate)

The new landlord only has the benefit and burden of the covenants while the reversion is vested in them.

Example:
Kamal granted a 50-year lease to Tina in 1995, which included a covenant for Tina to only use the property as a hairdresser and a covenant for Kamal to maintain the property in repair.
- Tina assigned the lease to Amy in 2001.
- In 2018, Kamal sold the freehold reversion to Laurie.
- Laurie now has the benefit of the landlord’s covenants, including the use covenant, which touches and concerns the land.
- Laurie can pursue Tina (the original tenant) via privity of contract and Amy (the current tenant) via privity of estate.
- The repair covenant passes to Amy (the benefit via privity of estate) and to Laurie (the burden via s 142 LPA 1925), and Amy can seek a remedy from Laurie for breaches.

58
Q

What is the position of the tenant under the LT(C)A 1995 with regards to covenants in a new lease?

A
  • Under the LT(C)A 1995, the tenant (including the original tenant and any subsequent assignee) is bound by the covenants of the lease only while the lease is vested in them.
  • Upon assignment of the lease, all landlord and tenant covenants pass to the assignee, unless they are expressed to be personal (s 3 LT(C)A 1995).
  • The assignee takes on the burden of the tenant covenants and acquires the benefit of the landlord covenants.
  • Covenants do not need to touch and concern the land to pass to the assignee.
  • The assigning tenant is automatically released from any liability under the lease upon assignment and ceases to be bound by the lease covenants and entitled to the benefit of any landlord covenants (s 5 LT(C)A 1995).
  • If the assignee breaches a covenant, the landlord can only pursue the assignee (the current tenant).
59
Q

What is the position of the landlord under the LT(C)A 1995 with regard to the covenants of a new lease?

A

Upon a sale of the reversion, the new landlord takes on the burden of the landlord covenants and acquires the benefit of the tenant covenants, provided that the covenants are not expressed to be personal (s 3 LT(C)A 1995).
- The covenants do not need to touch and concern the land to pass to the new landlord.

The outgoing landlord is not automatically released after an assignment of the reversion. They must follow the criteria in ss 6 and 8 LT(C)A 1995 to obtain a release from the landlord covenants.
- If the outgoing landlord does not obtain a release, they remain liable for the landlord covenants.
- The tenant may pursue either the former landlord, the new landlord, or both if the outgoing landlord has not been released.

The case Avonridge Property Co Ltd v Mashru [2005] UKHL 70 provides an alternative exit route for landlords, where they can limit their liability by stating in the lease that their liability ends once they have disposed of the reversion.

60
Q

What is an Authorised Guarantee Agreement (AGA) and what is its purpose in a new lease?

A

An Authorised Guarantee Agreement (AGA) is an agreement between the landlord and the outgoing tenant under which the outgoing tenant guarantees that the assignee (incoming tenant) will perform the lease covenants.
- If the assignee fails to perform the covenants, the landlord can take action against the former tenant who gave the AGA.
- The effect of s 5 LT(C)A 1995 is to release the outgoing tenant from liability under the lease upon assignment, but an AGA allows the landlord to improve their position by holding the outgoing tenant liable for the assignee’s performance.
- The AGA allows the landlord to pursue the former tenant directly without needing to take action against the assignee.

61
Q

What are the key terms and the effect of an Authorised Guarantee Agreement (AGA)?

A
  • The obligation under an AGA is a primary obligation, meaning the landlord can pursue the former tenant directly without first taking action against the assignee.
  • An AGA only guarantees the immediate assignee. If the assignee assigns the lease again, the AGA ceases to be in effect (s 16(4) LT(C)A 1995), meaning the former tenant no longer has liability for the tenant covenants.
  • Only one former tenant can be liable under an AGA at any given time.
  • The landlord can require the former tenant to enter a new lease if the assignee becomes bankrupt and the lease is disclaimed by the trustee in bankruptcy.
62
Q

When Can a Landlord Require an Authorised Guarantee Agreement (AGA)?

A

A landlord can only require an AGA if the lease contains a covenant against alienation without the landlord’s consent (i.e., the tenant must ask for the landlord’s permission before assigning the lease).

It must be either reasonable for the landlord to require an AGA or, in the case of a commercial lease, it must be a condition for the landlord to give consent (s 19(1A) LTA 1927).

63
Q

How can a former tenant recover from an assignee under an AGA, and what alternatives are available to the landlord?

A

A former tenant who suffers loss due to liability under an AGA from the assignee’s default can:
- Recover from the assignee based on the principle in Moule v Garrett (At common law against the tenant in possession at the time of the breach (ie the current
tenant) –Moule v Garrett (1872) LR Ex 101. Where one person discharges the liability of another, that person may seek to recover the amount they have paid from the person whose liability they have discharged;) or
- More commonly, based on an express indemnity given by the immediate assignee.

Indemnity covenants are not implied on every assignment under new leases (s 14 LT(C)A 1995).
As an alternative to an AGA, a landlord can seek a contractual guarantor to guarantee the performance of an assignee.

64
Q

How does the retrospective effect of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 improve the position of a former tenant?

A

Sections 17, 18, and 19 apply to both old and new leases.

The aim is to improve the position of a former tenant who remains liable due to:
- Privity of contract in an old lease.
- The terms of an AGA in a new lease.

65
Q

What process must a landlord follow under Section 17 of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 to recover rent from a former tenant?

A

To recover a fixed charge, including rent, from a former tenant, the landlord must:
- Serve a default notice on the former tenant within six calendar months of the fixed charge falling due.

If the landlord fails to serve the default notice, they cannot recover the fixed charge from the former tenant.

If the former tenant pays the sum demanded in full, they can request an overriding lease from the landlord.

Definition of Fixed Charge: Defined in LTCA 1995, s 17 as charges like arrears of rent, service charges, or insurance premiums. Fixed charges do not include unascertained liabilities or damages that are determined only after a court order.

66
Q

What is the purpose of the default notice under Section 17 of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 and how does it impact landlords and former tenants?

A
  • The default notice acts as an early warning to the former tenant, preventing arrears from accumulating before the landlord takes action.
  • For the landlord, it is an additional bureaucratic hurdle before taking action against a former tenant.
  • If the former tenant pays the sum demanded in full, they can request an overriding lease from the landlord.
67
Q

What does Section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 address in terms of lease assignment?

A

Section 18 applies when an assignee agrees to a variation of the terms of the lease which was not contemplated in the original lease.

Under LTCA 1995, s 18, former tenants and guarantors are not liable for additional amounts resulting from variations to the lease made after assignment if those variations were unanticipated at the time the lease was entered into:

Unanticipated Variations: Liability does not extend to any increase in payments due to variations they could not have foreseen when the lease was signed.

Anticipated Adjustments: Former tenants who remain liable, such as through an Authorised Guarantee Agreement (AGA), are still responsible for rent increases that occur due to an anticipated rent review clause in the original lease, as this type of variation would have been anticipated at the outset.

68
Q

What does Section 19 of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 allow a former tenant to do if they pay a fixed charge following a default notice?

A

If a former tenant pays the sum demanded in full under Section 17, Section 19 allows them to request an overriding lease from the landlord.

The overriding lease will be:
- For the same duration as the original lease, plus three days.
- On the same terms as the original lease.
- Granted by the landlord to the former tenant, making them the landlord to the defaulting assignee.

The former tenant must then pay rent to the landlord and comply with the tenant covenants in the same way as under the original lease.

If the former tenant requests an overriding lease, the landlord is obliged to grant it within a reasonable time.

The former tenant is then better able to ensure the assignee’s compliance under the terms of the lease, or terminate the assignee’s lease and re-let the property, or assign the overriding lease to a more reliable tenant.

69
Q

In 2018, Lionel (the freehold owner) granted a lease (by deed) to Tansy for a term of 25 years at an annual rent of £12,000 payable in advance by equal monthly payments on the first day of each month.

In 2019, Tansy assigned the lease (by deed and with Lionel’s consent) to Annalise. Annalise has not paid the rent for the last seven months.

Can Lionel take action against Tansy for unpaid rent?

A

Tansy was automatically released from any liability under the lease when she assigned to Annalise – s 5 LT(C)A 1995.

Tansy will only be liable for the rent if, when she assigned the lease, she provided an AGA to Lionel – s 16 LT(C)A 1995. If so, Lionel must first serve a default notice on Tansy within six calendar months of the fixed charge falling due – s 17 LT(C)A 1995.

The rent has not been paid for seven months. Lionel cannot claim the month’s rent due seven months ago, but can claim the remaining six months provided he serves the default notice immediately.

If Tansy pays the sum demanded in full, she can request an overriding lease from Lionel – s
19 LT(C)A 1995.

70
Q

What remedies are available to a landlord for non-payment of rent?

A
  • Debt action
  • Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR)
  • Forfeiture
71
Q

What is the process and impact of debt action for non-payment of rent?

A
  • A lease will often contain an express covenant for the tenant to pay rent; if not, it is implied in the case of a parol lease.
  • The landlord may sue the tenant for debt, which is not a damages claim and does not terminate the lease.
  • The landlord may pursue the current tenant, a former tenant (via privity of contract or an AGA), or both.
  • For a former tenant, the landlord must serve a default notice under Section 17 of the LT(C)A 1995.
  • The Limitation Act 1980, Section 19, prevents the landlord from bringing a debt claim after six years from the date the arrears became due.
  • Pursuing debt action acknowledges the existence of the lease and may waive the landlord’s right to forfeit the lease.
72
Q

What are the key features of the Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR) process for landlords?

A

CRAR was introduced by the Tribunal, Courts, and Enforcement Act 2007, effective from April 2014, replacing previous distress rules.
- CRAR can only be used against the tenant in possession (the tenant currently responsible for rent).
- The landlord may enter the premises to seize the tenant’s goods and sell them, using the proceeds to pay the rent arrears.
- No court order is required, but a specific procedure must be followed.

Key conditions for CRAR:
- Only applies to commercial property leases.
- Can only be used for ‘normal’ rent (not for service charges or insurance premiums, even if they are reserved as rent in the lease).
- Rent arrears must exceed seven days’ rent.
- The landlord must provide at least seven days’ notice before taking control of the tenant’s goods, given by an authorised enforcement agent.
- The tenant’s goods are ‘bound’ when the notice is given. The tenant can challenge the notice in court.
- Only an enforcement agent may take control of the goods.

CRAR does not end the lease and may waive the landlord’s right to forfeit.

73
Q

What is forfeiture for non-payment of rent and how does it work?

A
  • Forfeiture, also known as the right to re-enter, is the landlord’s right to retake physical possession of the premises and terminate the lease prematurely for non-payment of rent.
  • This right is provided under Section 1(2)(e) of the Law of Property Act 1925.
  • Forfeiture can only be exercised against the tenant in possession, not a former tenant.
  • The right to forfeit must be expressly reserved in the lease, often called a “forfeiture clause,” which specifies conditions under which forfeiture may occur, such as rent being unpaid for 21 days.
  • A standard forfeiture clause might read: “If the rent or any part of it remains unpaid for 21 days, the landlord may re-enter the premises and terminate the lease.”
  • A right to forfeit is never implied into a legal lease - there must be an express forfeiture clause for it to apply.
  • A right to forfeit is implied into an equitable lease.
74
Q

How can a landlord waive their right to forfeit a lease for non-payment of rent?

A

Once the right to forfeit arises, the landlord may lose this right if their conduct suggests they have waived it. The landlord’s right to forfeit will arise in the subsequent month if no rent demand or other example of implied waiver is sent out for that month’s rent payment.

Waiver can be express or implied. Implied waiver occurs if the landlord performs an act that acknowledges the lease is still in effect, knowing about the breach.

Examples of implied waiver include:
- Exercising CRAR
- Demanding future rent
- Suing for or accepting rent after the breach

Waiver will not be implied if the landlord has shown they no longer regard the lease as subsisting, such as starting possession proceedings.

75
Q

How does waiver operate in relation to continuing and non-continuing breaches for a landlord’s right to forfeit?

A

Waiver operates differently for continuing and non-continuing breaches in relation to a landlord’s right to forfeit:

Continuing Breach (e.g., failure to repair): Waiver only lasts until the next day the breach continues, at which point the landlord can reject rent and forfeit the lease.

Non-Continuing Breach (‘Once and for All’): For a one-time breach, such as unauthorised sub-letting, waiver is permanent. Once the landlord accepts rent, they cannot forfeit for that specific breach in the future.

Waiver Scope: Only affects the landlord’s right to forfeit; the landlord can still pursue other remedies, such as actions for debt or damages.

Breach of Covenant to Pay Rent: Waiver can apply to a failure to pay rent; if the landlord accepts the next month’s rent, they waive the right to forfeit for the previous non-payment.

Non-Payment of Rent as Non-Continuing Breach: Each missed rent payment is treated as a separate breach (per London and County (A&D) Ltd v Wilfred Sportsman Ltd [1971]), creating a separate right to forfeit. Thus, waiving the right to forfeit for one missed payment does not prevent forfeiture for future missed payments.

76
Q

What are the methods a landlord can use to forfeit a lease for non-payment of rent?

A

A landlord can forfeit the lease in one of two ways:
- Peacefully re-entering the premises
- Suing for and obtaining a possession order through the courts

Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 makes it a criminal offence to repossess premises using force.

If the premises are residential and the occupier remains, the landlord must obtain a court order before re-entering, as per Section 2 of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977.

77
Q

What options does a tenant have to seek relief against forfeiture for non-payment of rent?

A

A tenant can apply to the court for relief against forfeiture, which, if granted, allows them to retake the premises under the original lease terms as though the forfeiture had not occurred.

The court has discretion to grant relief even after it has made an order to forfeit the lease on condition that all arrears and costs are paid.

Relief can be granted in the following circumstances:
(i) If the landlord sues for possession, the tenant can pay all arrears of rent and costs before the trial. In this case, the court must grant relief.

(ii) If the tenant applies for relief within six months of the landlord’s re-entry under a court order, the court has discretion to grant relief.

(iii) If the landlord forfeits a non-residential lease without court proceedings, the six-month time limit does not apply, and the court can grant relief through its inherent equitable jurisdiction.

78
Q

What remedies are available to a landlord when a tenant breaches a covenant other than to pay rent?

A

When a tenant breaches a covenant other than rent payment, the landlord has several remedies:
- Damages
- Specific performance
- Forfeiture
- Self-help remedy

79
Q

How are damages calculated for a landlord’s claim against a tenant for breaching a non-rent covenant, and what limitations apply?

A

A claim for damages does not end the lease. The ordinary contractual rules for damages apply:
(a) Damages include those that arise naturally from the breach.
(b) Damages include those in contemplation of both parties when the contract was made, as the probable result of the breach.

Damages may be claimed from:
- The tenant in possession
- A former tenant liable through privity of contract or an AGA (no need for a s.17 LT(C)A 1995 default notice, as damages are not considered a fixed charge).

For disrepair, damages are limited to the amount by which the reversionary interest has decreased due to the disrepair (s.18 LTA 1927).

If the lease has three or more years remaining, the landlord must serve a s.146 LPA 1925 notice before claiming damages for disrepair, allowing the tenant 28 days to counterclaim under the Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938.

80
Q

When might a landlord seek specific performance against a tenant for breaching a non-rent covenant, and are there any limitations?

A

Specific performance is a discretionary remedy available against a tenant in possession, but it does not terminate the lease.

It is rarely ordered for breaches of a repairing covenant because damages are generally seen as an adequate remedy.

81
Q

What conditions must be met for a landlord to forfeit a lease for a breach of covenant other than non-payment of rent?

A
  • Forfeiture for breaches other than non-payment of rent must be expressly reserved in the lease.
  • If the landlord waives the breach, they lose the right to forfeit for that breach.
  • Forfeiture can be executed through peaceable re-entry or by obtaining a court order.
  • If the premises are partly or wholly let as a dwelling and the tenant is in occupation, a court order is required (s.2 PEA 1977).
  • The lease terminates upon forfeiture, which applies only against the tenant in possession.
82
Q

When is a s.146 notice required, and what steps must a landlord take under s.146 LPA 1925 before forfeiting a lease for a breach of covenant (excluding rent)?

A

Before forfeiting, the landlord must serve a s.146 LPA 1925 notice specifying:
(a) The breach in question;
(b) A requirement to remedy the breach within a reasonable time, if the breach is capable of remedy; and
(c) A demand for compensation, if desired.

Certain breaches, such as breach of a covenant against alienation, are considered “once and for all” and cannot be remedied, so the landlord need not allow time to remedy these breaches in the notice.

If the tenant remedies the breach within the time specified, forfeiture is prevented. If not, and if the breach is remediable, the landlord may proceed with forfeiture.

83
Q

What relief options are available for tenants and subtenants against forfeiture, and what is the effect of such relief?

A

Tenants can apply for relief against forfeiture either:
- As part of the landlord’s possession proceedings, or
- In response to the landlord’s peaceable re-entry (s.146(2) LPA 1925).

The court may grant relief on terms it deems fit, but the tenant must seek equity “with clean hands.”

Relief reinstates the lease as though forfeiture had not occurred.

If a head lease is forfeited, any sublease also ceases; however, subtenants may apply for relief under s.146(4) LPA 1925, allowing the court to vest the head lease in the sub-lessee on appropriate terms.

84
Q

What self-help remedy does a landlord have for a tenant’s breach of the repair covenant, and what provisions must the lease include for this remedy to apply?

A

Following Jervis v Harris [1996], a self-help remedy allows landlords to address tenant breaches of the repair covenant, provided the lease includes specific provisions:
- The landlord may enter and inspect the property.
- The landlord can issue a notice to the tenant specifying repairs and a deadline for completion.
- If the tenant fails to complete the repairs, the landlord may enter and conduct the repairs themselves.
- The landlord can recover the cost of repairs from the tenant as a debt, bypassing s.18 LTA 1927 and the Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938 provisions.

85
Q

What remedies are available to tenants for a landlord’s breach of covenant?

A

Specific performance/injunction:
- An equitable and discretionary remedy.
- Rarely ordered for breaches of a repairing covenant, as damages are usually deemed adequate.

Damages:
Ordinary contractual principles apply to assess damages:
- (a) Damages include those that arise naturally from the breach.
- (b) Damages include those in contemplation of both parties when the contract was made, as the probable result of the breach.

Self-help: The landlord’s failure to perform an obligation does not entitle the tenant to withhold rent.

However, regarding a repair obligation:
- The tenant may notify the landlord that a repair is needed and inform them that the tenant will carry out the repair if the landlord fails to do so.
- If the tenant performs the repairs, they may withhold rent until reimbursed for the repair’s cost (common law set-off).
- Alternatively, if the tenant withholds rent and the landlord sues, equity may allow the tenant’s unliquidated claim to be set off against the rent liability if there is a sufficiently direct connection between the claims (equitable set-off).
- The tenant’s claim must arise directly from the landlord and tenant relationship established by the lease.

86
Q

What are the different methods through which a lease can be brought to an end?

A

A lease can be brought to an end by a variety of methods, including:
- Effluxion of time
- Notice to quit
- Break clause
- Surrender
- Disclaimer
- Frustration
- Repudiatory breach
- Merger
- Forfeiture (this is covered in the remedies for the tenant and landlord).

87
Q

How does a lease terminate by effluxion of time?

A

A fixed-term lease comes to an end automatically when the specified term comes to an end.

For example, a lease for five years granted on 1 January 2020 will expire by effluxion of time on 31 December 2024.

88
Q

How is a periodic tenancy terminated by notice to quit?

A

A periodic tenancy will continue indefinitely from one period to the next until either party gives notice to quit.

The ability to give notice cannot be reserved to one party alone.

The general rule requires one full period’s notice:
- A weekly tenancy requires one week’s notice.
- A monthly tenancy requires one month’s notice.
- A yearly tenancy requires not less than half a year’s notice.

The notice must expire at the end of a clear period.

If the premises are wholly or partly let as a dwelling house and the tenant is in occupation, not less than four weeks’ notice must be given (s 5 PEA 1977).

89
Q

What is a break clause, and how does it operate to determine a lease?

A
  • A break clause is a contractual provision allowing the landlord, tenant, or both parties to terminate the lease.
  • The break clause may specify a fixed date or be on a rolling basis.
  • It is exercised by one party giving notice to the other of their intention to activate the break clause.
90
Q

How does surrender operate to terminate a lease?

A
  • Surrender requires mutual agreement between the landlord and tenant for the tenant’s estate to be yielded up to the landlord.
  • The lease then merges into the landlord’s reversionary estate and is extinguished.
  • An express surrender must be contained in a deed.
  • Surrender only terminates the lease that is agreed to be surrendered.
  • It does not terminate the interest of any sub-tenant, even if the rights of the sub-tenant were unknown to the landlord.
91
Q

What is disclaimer, and when does it lead to the termination of a lease?

A
  • Disclaimer arises upon the bankruptcy or liquidation of the tenant.
  • The trustee in bankruptcy or liquidator can disclaim contracts that involve a liability to pay money or perform any onerous act.
  • Disclaimer releases the tenant from all further liability, but it does not end any sub-tenancy.
  • A sub-tenant may seek an order to vest the disclaimed property in themselves.
92
Q

How might the doctrine of frustration apply to lease termination?

A
  • A contract is frustrated when something unexpected occurs, through no fault of either party, making the performance of the contract significantly different from what was originally agreed.
  • While the doctrine of frustration is, in principle, applicable to leases, there are no reported cases in which a lease has been held to be frustrated.
  • Frustration may potentially apply if the property is destroyed or ceases to exist.
93
Q

How might a repudiatory breach lead to the termination of a lease?

A
  • A repudiatory breach occurs when one party commits a breach that goes to the root of the contract, allowing the other party to accept that repudiation and regard the contract as terminated.
  • There is limited case law supporting the termination of a lease due to a repudiatory breach by the landlord.
94
Q

What happens when a lease is terminated by merger?

A

Merger occurs when the tenant purchases the freehold reversion, holding both interests at the same time.

Provided there is no contrary intention, the lease merges into the reversionary title and is extinguished.