8) Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Purpose of Act

Section 6

Evidence Act 2006

A

help to secure the just determination of proceedings by:
a) providing for facts to be established by the application of logical rules
b) providing rules of evidence that recognise the importance of the rights affirmed by the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990
c) Promoting fairness to parties and witnesses
e) Avoiding unjustifiable expense and delay
f) enhancing access to the law of evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rules of evidence admissibility

Section 7

Evidence Act 2006

A
  • all evidence is admissible unless:
    • inadmissible under this act
    • excluded under this act
  • evidence that is not relevant is excluded
  • any evidence that proves or disproves is relevant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

fairness and general exclusion

Section 8 - general exclusion

Evidence Act 2006

A
  • Judge must exclude evidence if:
    -has unfair prejudicial effect on proceeding
    -needlessly prolong the proceeding
  • Judge must consider rights of defendant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Admission by agreement

Section 9

Evidence Act 2006

A

allows for admission of evidence where parties agree
eg: expert evidence (Police handup)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Burden of proof

Evidence Act 2006

A

The burden of proof lies clearly with the prosecution in relation to all of the elements of the offence
- except insanity defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Standard of proof

Evidence Act 2006

A

Beyond reasonable doubt
-prosecution standard
- “you are sure the accused is guilty”
vs.
Balance of probabilities
- defence required to prove an element
- “it is more probable than not”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Examination of witnesses

Section 84

Evidence Act 2006

A

In any proceeding (unless this act or another, or the judge directs otherwise)
a) a witness first gives evidence in chief and
b) the witness may then be cross examined by all parties other than the party calling the witness
c) the witness may then be re examined after cross examination

A witness giving evidence by affidavit or reading a written statement is to be treated as evidence in chief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Corroboration

Section 121

Evidence Act 2006

A

Generally, one witness’s testimony, unsupported by any other evidence, will suffice to prove a case.

except - perjury and treason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Veracity and propensity

Evidence Act 2006

A

Veracity: is the disposition of a person to refrain from lying

Propensity: is the person’s tendency to act in a particular way or have a particular state of mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hearsay

Section 18

Evidence Act 2006

A

Generally not admissable
except:
circumstances relating to the statement provide reasonable assurance the statement is reliable and
either - the maker of the statement is unavailable
or the Judge considers undue expense/delay in requiring maker of statement to attend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Visual evidence

Section 45

Evidence Act 2006

A

Admissible if follow formal proceedure:
* no fewer than 7 other persons similar appearance
* give no indication
* written record of proceedure
* certified true by officer conducting proceedure

or good reason not to follow formal proceedure

should prevent dock indentification for first time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Voice identification

Section 46

Evidence Act 2006

A

Voice ID is generally inadmissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hostile witness

A

Exhibits lack of veracity
Gives inconsistent evidence
Refuses to answer or withholds evidence

if declared “hostile”

deploy leading questions
probe accurancy of answers
use other evidence to challenge answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Admissibility of evidence

Evidence Act 2006

A

Not admissible if excluded under:
* the reliability rule (s28)
* oppression (s29)
* the improperly obtained evidence rule (s30)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly