8. Damages Flashcards

1
Q

When can an innocent party claim damages from the other contracting party?

A

If the other party breaches ANY term of the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Two ways of measuring the appropriate level of damages

A
  1. Expectation Loss
  2. Reliance Loss
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Expectation Loss

A

Claimant is compensated for their lost expectation (benefit which the claimant would have obtained had contract been properly performed) when goods turn out to be fake, when good are not delivered, when goods are not accepted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reliance loss

A

When an expectation cannot be made (forecasted future success, e.g.), will look at cost of ‘getting to that point’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can a claimant get damages for mental distress and disappointment?

A

Generally, no, but when the main objects of the contract is to have peace of mind (ie. hospitality and holiday contracts) - potentially

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Remoteness of Damage rule: Contractual Damages

A

A party will not be awarded damages for loss which is too remote a consequence of the breach. Remoteness means that the loss must have been within the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the time of the contract as being a probable result of the breach; Hadley v Baxendale (1854)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Two limbs of remoteness of damage rule

A

Limb 1: Loss which arises naturally from the breach will normally be within the parties’ reasonable contemplation
Limb 2: Unusual loss will be within the parties’ reasonable contemplation only if the special circumstances which give rise to the loss are known to both the parties at the time the contract is made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How might damages be limited?

A
  1. Failure to mitigate by claimant
  2. If breach is negligent, contributory negligence
  3. Specified Damages and Penalty Clauses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Specified (liquidated/agreed) Damages Clause

A

genuine attempt to pre-estimate the loss which is likely to be caused by the breach. Is binding, and the sum specified will be paid regardless of the actual loss. Usual rules of measure of damages (remoteness, mitigation) do not apply.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Penalty Damage Clause

A
  • attempt to put pressure on a party to perform the contract, unenforceable. Court can assess damages in usual way and use principles
    • Claimant may want to argue clause is a penalty if their loss is greater than the amount stated (therefore, it would be unenforceable)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Action for an agreed sum

A

Straightforward claim for an amount due when one party has not met the obligation that they pay a definite sum of money to the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Conditions to pursue action for an agreed sum?

A

The duty to pay must have arisen (ie. If specified date by which the payment reaches, this must have passed )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When does the right to terminate the contract arise?

A

1) Breach of condition (particularly important term)

2) Very serious breach of an innominate term (repudiatory breaches)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If one party breaches a condition of the contract, must the innocent party terminate it?

A

No, they have a choice to affirm the contract or discharge it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If an innocent party opts to terminate a contract, what is the effect?

A

Future obligations will be discharged. Innocent party can sue for damages or loss suffered. Must communicate to other party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Order for Specific Performance

A

Order of the court which requires party to perform its contractual obligations

17
Q

Consequence of a party failing to comply with an order for specific performance

A

Contempt of court

18
Q

Can an individual pursue both specific performance and damages?

A

Yes

19
Q

Restrictions on the availability of specific performance as a remedy

A
  1. Normally only awarded if damages are inadequate
  2. Only granted if it is just and equitable to do so
  3. rarely used for service contracts
20
Q

When are injunctions not an appropriate remedy?

A
  1. If it would compel someone to do something they cannot be ordered to do in specific performance (like employment)
  2. If the court believes party does not have clean hands etc. (other equitable maxims)
21
Q

Aim of Restitution

A

To prevent one party being unjustly enriched at the expense of the other

22
Q

Two potential claims in restitution

A
  1. Total failure of consideration (recovery of money)
  2. Compensation for work done or goods supplied (Quantum Meruit)
23
Q

How are restitutionary damages determined

A

By assessing the ‘gain made’ by the defendant

24
Q

Non-Pecuniary Losses: what are they?

A

Things which cannot be assessed in financial terms easily

25
Q

Pecuniary Loss: Examples

A

Loss which translates into financial terms
- eg. amount of lost profits or amount of damage to a property (determines the award of damages easily)

26
Q

Remoteness of Damage

A

Damage must have been in the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the time of the contract as being a likely consequence of the breach
- for those which would not be inevitable losses in the event of breach, whether this loss is too remote will hinge on what the defendant actually knew at the time of the contract

27
Q

If physical injury is not too remote (is in the contemplation of the parties), need the extent of the injury also have been anticipated

A

No, the extent of the loss is irrelevant

28
Q

Mitigation of loss: How do the legal / evidential burdens operate

A
  1. Burden of showing the claimant has failed to mitigate is placed on defendant
29
Q

If a claimant has tried (and failed) to mitigate their loss, can they claim for the full amount?

A

Yes, they must have taken reasonable steps to mitigate though - this will be a question of fact for the court

30
Q

Different methods of awarding damages?

A
  1. Consumer Surplus / loss of amenity
  2. Difference in value
  3. Cost of Cure
  4. Distress and disappointment
  5. Nominal
31
Q

When will the court award consumer surplus damages / loss of amenity damages?

A

If there is no difference in value but the cost of cure is out of all proportion

32
Q

What are nominal damages, when would they be awarded?

A

Damages awarded when the claimant has not suffered any loss, but the court wants to acknowledge that the contract has been broken (will be a small sum such as 10GBP)