8: Companies: Management Flashcards
8 types of director?
De facto director
- anyone who acts as a director
- not specifically appointed
- becomes liable as a director due to his or her conduct
De jure director
- appointed through correct legal procedure
Shadow director
- person in accordance with those directions or instruction the directors of a company are accustomed
- not a director is only acting on advice in processional capacity
Alternative director
- appointed by director to attend and vote at board meetings
- may be another director or outsider
- might be subject to board approval
EDs
- full time employee involved in management
- normally has a specific role
NEDs
- part time
- bring outside expertise
- not an employee
- controls EDs
Managing director
- day to day management of company’s business
Chairman
- ensured procedures in meetings is followed
- Usually a NED
Appointment of directors in brief?
Appointed by existing directors or ordinary resolution
Directors of public companies should be voted on individually
Actions are valid unless appointment is defective
Company must notify registrar of changes within 14 days. Must also update register of directors
The ways a director might leave office?
Death
Winding up of company
Removal
Disqualification
Resignation
Not offering themselves for re-election
The mod articles provide that a director should leave office in what circumstances?
Prohibited from being a director by law
Bankruptcy order is made
Medical practitioner gives written opinion that they are physically or mentally incapable
Court passes order that mental health prevents them from exercising powers of director
Director resigns
The procedure for the removal of a director?
Special notice (28 days) is required of the resolution by persons wishing to remove director
Forward the copy of the resolution to the director concerned
Notice of meeting goes out, all members entitled to attend and vote
Director in question can require the company to circulate written reps to members
At the meeting, director can read out reps.
Director must be allowed to attend the meeting and to speak.
An ordinary resolution is passed to remove director
When is the power of members to remove a director limited?
Director who is also a member may validly be given weighted voting rights in decision to remove them
Shareholder agreement may state that shareholders of each class must be present for decisions to be valid. One person not attending could prevent removal!
How do director’s exercise powers?
Members delegate to directors
Directors are required to exercise their powers in accordance with company’s constitution.
Most companies have unrestricted objects, but articles may specifically restrict
Power is given to board as a WHOLE.
Members have no right to interfere in decisions by board. Directors are not agents of the members and are not subject to their instruction.
What kind of restrictions are put on directors powers?
General statutory restriction
- directors can use powers for ‘purpose for which they are conferred’
- directors using powers for any other reason is a breach
Specific statutory restrictions
- certain decisions must gain shareholder approval by way of ordinary or special resolution
Restrictions in articles
- provisions in articles can restriction directors
Restriction of powers made by members
If members are unhappy they can:
- remove director by ordinary resolution
- alter articles by special resolution
What do directors need to bind the company?
AUTHORITY!
Express
Implied
- from the persons position
- MD can bind in same way as board, has authority typical of role
Apparent/ostensible
- director is held out as having authority
- if a third party acts in good faith, company is estopped from denying truth
- third party acts in good faith until contrary is proved, like if they have knowledge of actual lack of authority
What happens if transactions are made by board outside board’s powers?
Power of directors is not limited by anything in company’s constitution, provided the other party is acting in good faith
Includes when the transaction exceeds the board’s actual authority
Other party having knowledge of the directors lack of express authority is not enough to demonstrate lack of good faith
So - any contract entered into by board is binding (although members can always restrain board members on making transactions)
BUT - if third party is a director or person associated with director, transaction becomes voidable
- anyone involved in this is then liable to compensate the company for any profit or to indemnify contract
Does not apply if reimbursement is no longer possible or company has affirmed contract
What sets the duties of directors?
Companies Act 2006 sets specific statutory duties
The ones in legislation are general duties - learn!
Individual may still be subject to duties even after they cease to be director
Directors general duties: Act within powers?
Director must act in accordance with company’s constitution
Only use powers for the purpose which they were given
If director carries out a transaction they do not have authority for, it is void, unless approved by shareholders
Directors general duties: promote the success of the company?
Directors must act in good faith, in a way which promotes the success of company and benefit of the members
Directors must have regard to:
- consequences of long term decisions
- interest of employees
- need to foster business relationships
- impact of company’s operations on community and environment
- desirability of reputation
- need to act fairly between members
Directors general duties: exercise independent judgement
Duty is not infringed by a director acting:
- in accordance with an agreement duly entered into that restrict the future exercise of discretion
- in a way authorised by the company’s constitution
Directors general duties: exercise reasonable care and diligence
Standard expected of a director is that of a reasonably diligent person with:
- general and actual knowledge, skill and experience that could be expected and is held
Directors general duties: avoid conflicts of interest
Avoid a situation where the director is in conflict with the interest of the company
Not infringed if matter has been authorised by directors, provided articles do not say otherwise
Duty does not apply to a transaction or arrangement
Relevant director does not count towards quorum on determining authorisation
Directors general duties: do not accept benefits from third parties
Director must not accept any benefit from third party
Unless acceptance will not give rise to conflict of interest
Directors general duties: declare an interest in a proposed transaction or arrangement
Director must declare the extent and nature of such an interest
Declaration can be made:
- in writing
- at a board meeting
- or by general notice
Who do the directors owe their duties to?
The shareholders as a collective - present and future
The directors owe no general duty to independent members
Breaches may be ratified
What are the consequences of a breach of duty?
Director will be required to make good any loss suffered
Contracts between company and director may be voidable
Any property taken by the director can be recovered
Property may be recovered directly from a third party, unless party acquired in good faith
Injunction when breach has not yet occurred
Any provision to exempt a director for liability, due to breach or negligence, is void
BUT if course decides directors were acting honestly and reasonably, and thinks they ought to be fairly excused, they may not be liable
Definition of fraudulent trading?
Company’s business is carried on with intent to defraud creditors
Offence may be criminal or civil
Can involve just one transaction
High burden of proof involved
Definition of wrongful trading?
Before the start of winding up, director knew or ought to have known that there was no reasonable prospect that the company could avoid liquidation
And they did not take sufficient steps to minimise any loss
Definition of wrongful trading?
Before the start of winding up, director knew or ought to have known that there was no reasonable prospect that the company could avoid liquidation
And they did not take sufficient steps to minimise any loss
Who is liable for fraudulent trading?
Any persons knowingly partly to the fraud
Can be a person taking the decisions or playing an active part of the business