7.4 / 28 - Hedge Funds: Directional Strategies Flashcards
LO 28.1: Demonstrate knowledge of the financial economics of directional strategies.
• Compare and contrast equity long/short strategies, global macro strategies, and quantitative hedge fund strategies. • Discuss the effect of informational market efficiency on directional hedge fund strategies. • Describe behavioral finance, and discuss how behavioral biases affect investor behavior.
Discretionary (Directional) Strategies vs. Quantitative Strategies
Discretionary strategies involve fewer bets, larger position sizes, and considerably concentrated positions compared to quantitative strategies. The two discretionary directional strategies to be discussed are equity long/short and global macro.
Quantitative strategies are generally more systematic and involve almost no discretion.
The discretionary strategies involve much more research and analysis, which does not make it feasible to hold too many positions. On the other hand, quantitative strategies use algorithms and computerized processes, which allow for substantially more positions and smaller position sizes.
Two Discretionary Strategies
- equity long/short tends to focus on value and fundamentals with thorough due diligence performed on their investments, all in the style of Warren Buffett’s approach
- Global macro, on the other hand, is less detailed oriented but would hold strong opinions on international interest rates, equity prices, and commodity price, for example.
- Both strategies generate returns that are highly volatile, so significant gains or losses are likely.
3 versions of Informational Market Efficiency (Eugene Fama)
1. Weak form efficiency. The weak form of the EMH states that current security prices fully reflect all currently available security market data. Therefore, past price and volume (market) information will have no predictive power about the future direction of security prices because price changes will be independent from one period to the next.
2. Semistrong form efficiency. The semistrong form of the EMH holds that security prices rapidly adjust without bias to the arrival of all new public information. As such, current security prices reflect all publicly available information. All security prices include all past security market information and nonmarket information available to the public. The implication is that an investor cannot achieve positive risk-adjusted returns on average by using fundamental analysis. In practice, semistrong form efficiency does not exist completely given the existence of many successful equity long/ short fundamental strategies.
3. Strong form efficiency. The strong form of the EMH states that security prices fully reflect all information from both public and private sources. It includes all types of information: past security market information, public, and private (inside) information.
What is a value trap
A value trap can be described as when an undervalued security remains that way for an extended period due to strong competition or weak management, for example.
What is a short squeeze?
short squeeze can be described as an overvalued security that does not fall in value, but actually rises rapidly in value in the short term. The result is that the short sellers incur losses to cover their short positions.
What is Behavioral Finance
Behavioral finance questions the assumptions of the EMH that investors act rationally and objectively consider all relevant information in valuing securities. addresses:
- limits to arbitrage, which refers to rational investors being challenged to overcome dislocations resulting from irrational investors, and
- cognitive psychology, which can be described as the study of how people make investment decisions and how they fail to demonstrate complete rationality in the investment process when emotions are considered.
WHat are the 6 behavioral biases to consider ipacting investor behavior?
(1) leverage aversion/restriction,
(2) sentiment sensitivity,
(3) overconfidence,
(4) anchoring effects,
(5) confirmation bias, and
(6) loss aversion/disposition effect.
Behavioral biase 1) Leverage aversion
Leverage aversion theory suggests that investors who are unable or limited in ability to use leverage would drive up the prices of high-beta assets with the end result being negative alphas. High-beta assets are equivalent to average-beta assets that are levered up.
Betting against beta (BAB) is a strategy whereby an investor holds a long position in low-beta assets and a short position in high-beta assets. The empirical evidence supports BAB’s effectiveness in that BAB generated 0.7% per month between January 1926 and March 2012 in a variety of different asset classes.
high-quality assets - those that are safe, profitable, growing, and well managed. study suggests that a strategy of a long position in high-quality assets and a short position in low-quality assets earns substantial risk-adjusted returns. Importantly, both the BAB strategy and the high-quality strategy were found to also hold in many non-U.S. markets.
Behavioral Biase 2) Sentiment Sensitivity
Sentiment can be described as beliefs regarding future cash flows and risks that are not backed up with sufficient research and facts. The aggregate level of stock prices is a function of sentiment and it is the riskier stocks that are most exposed to investor sentiment. Betting against investor sentiment is potentially a losing strategy due to the limits of arbitrage;
A sentiment index is created to demonstrate a strong correlation between index returns and the returns of riskier stocks. The existence of greater transaction costs and risks makes those stocks more difficult to arbitrage and to value. The sentiment index uses six underlying elements: : discounts on closed-end funds; turnover of NYSE shares; number of IPOs; average first-day returns on IPOs; equity share in new issues; and the dividend premium, which can be described as the difference between the average market-to-book-value ratios of dividend paying firms and non-dividend paying firms.
. Accruals refer to the level of net income versus cash flow, so a low-accrual stock has lower net income than cash flow. The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) suggests that high-beta socks will outperform low-beta stocks and high-accrual stocks will underperform low-accrual stocks.
Behavioral Bias 3) Overconfidence
Overconfidence occurs when investors overestimate their own intuitive ability or reasoning. It may result in underestimating risk and overestimating return as demonstrated by a study by Fischoff, Slovic, and Lichtenstein (1977)5 whereby they found that events that individuals thought were 100% likely to occur actually occurred only 80% of the time. Overconfidence tends to result in excessive portfolio turnover and transaction costs, resulting in lower returns.
Behavioral Bias 4) Anchoring Effects
Anchoring effects can occur when investors rationally form an initial view, but then fail to change that view as new information becomes available.
An analyst who ignores the forecasted information is falling subject to anchoring effect
Behavioral Bias 5) Confirmation bias
Confirmation bias occurs when investors look for new information or distort new
information to support an existing view. Duong, Pescetto, and Santamaria (2010)6 studied confirmation bias in the U.K. by studying value investing and glamour investing using fundamentals. Value stocks have a high book-to-market ratio, earnings-to-price ratio, and cash-flow-to-price ratio whereas glamour stocks have the opposite characteristics.
Behavioral Bias 6) Loss aversion/disposition effect
Loss aversion/disposition effect arises from investors feeling more pain from a loss than pleasure from an equal gain. Prospect theory results in making choices that favor certain outcomes versus probable outcomes.
LO 28.2: Demonstrate knowledge of the background of the equity long/short hedge fund strategies
- Describe the equity long/short investment strategy.
- Recognize the potential equity long/short investment opportunity set.
- Discuss the value, growth, and blend approaches to equity long/short investing.
- Describe and compare the bottom-up approach and the top-down approach to fundamental analysis.
- Describe Gordon’s growth model and the enterprise valuation model for fundamental equity valuation, and use these models to calculate valuations for a given investment.
- Describe the sector-specific approach and the activist approach to equity long/ short investment.
- Discuss the steps involved in the process of executing a long/short hedge fund strategy (i.e., idea generation, optimal idea expression, position sizing, and trade execution).
- Recognize the risks associated with equity long/short investing, and describe how they may be managed.
- Describe the issues of managerial expertise, sources of return, and return attribution as they apply to the analysis of equity long/short strategies, and calculate the return on a given long/short investment.
- Discuss the procedures involved in the investment process for a fundamental equity long/short manager.
Describe Fundamental Equity Long/Short strategy
Fundamental equity long/short, or simply equity long/short, is a combination strategy in which the investment manager buys equities expected to rise in value and sells equities expected to fall in value. Stock-picking ability is a key measure of the strategy’s success. The various strategies vary in terms of the extent of discretionary processes (i.e., fundamental analysis, qualitative) versus systematic processes (i.e., technical analysis, quantitative) used.
Compared with market-neutral and statistical arbitrage managers, long/short managers tend to have much longer holding periods (e.g., 3–5 years) and more concentrated portfolios consisting of 3–10 core positions with an additional 20–40 smaller satellite positions.
Threee approaches that EQuity Long/Short managers apply to investing
- *• Value long/short managers** use a contrarian approach, as the focus is on firms currently out of favor. Ratio analysis may also be used, with a focus on price-to-earnings (P/E), book-to-market, dividend yield, and P/E to earnings growth rate (PEG) ratios.
- *• The growth approach** focuses on firms with superior top-line (i.e., revenue) growth potential, using the growth at a reasonable price (GARP) approach. Small high-tech companies are often included in the approach. Managers are willing to overlook negative current earnings if the firm has high growth potential.
- *• The blended approach** is a combination of the value and growth approaches. For example, the value approach may be used in falling markets and the growth approach may be used in rising markets.
bottom-up fundamental analysis
Most equity long/short managers use bottom-up fundamental analysis. Those managers may use an approach using strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (i.e., SWOT analysis).
- Since portfolios are more concentrated and focused on specific stock selection, long/short managers spend a significant amount of time doing field research trying to discern information not necessarily reported in public financial documents.
- Focuse on firm’s prospects, competity advantages, industry factors, political or regulatory risks
- assemble a range of forecasts regarding a company’s future performance (e.g., sales, expenses) to lead to estimated cash flows upon which a discount rate is applied to estimate the company’s value.
top-down fundamental analysis
Managers who use top-down fundamental analysis are not as concerned with firm-specific information as they are with overall economic drivers. Those managers focus on macroeconomic factors, market timing, and industry performance. As well, they have specific views on business cycle stage, inflationary expectations, and monetary and fiscal policies.
Gordon’s growth model (GGM)
A simplified equation assumes that the dividends will grow at a constant rate of g in each period. Therefore, the equation is as follows:
V0 = div1 / k - g