5.8 / 21 - Investing in Intellectual Property Flashcards
LO 21.1: Demonstrate knowledge of the characteristics of intellectual property
• Describe the characteristics of intellectual property (IP) asset
What is the definition of Intellectual Property (IP)?
an intangible asset that can be owned.
Examples of intellectual property include patents on new technologies and copyrights on written works.
The two major types of IP are:
- Unbundled IP
- Mature IP.
Describe Unbundled IP
Historically, IP was bundled with other corporate assets. An investor who bought stock in a company was investing in the firm’s IP, as well as the tangible assets. However, in recent years, institutions and firms have begun unbundling the IP and selling or licensing technologies and inventions on a stand-alone basis. Investors can buy, sell, and own IP outside the corporate umbrella. Investors can invest at different stages of development. Like venture capital investments, investors often lose all their capital, particularly when investing in IP at an early stage of its life but, in some instances, earn extremely large returns.
Describe Mature IP
In the case of mature IP, the IP has been fully developed and its usefulness to the market has been established. Cash flows are more predictable and valuations are more certain. An example of a mature IP is a motion picture already in distribution. A film may have a lifespan of 80 years or more. According to Soloveichik (2010)1, a film loses approximately half its value in the first year after release and then depreciates approximately 5% per year in subsequent years. This means IP (or at least some IP) suffers from declining marginal returns to scale. Also, a 2004 study2 finds that DVD sales and licensing revenues have a correlation of 0.97 and 0.99, respectively, with domestic box office revenues, although the correlations might be artificially high due to nonrobust statistical test
R&D Returns (rates)
Private, pre-tax returns on research and development (R&D) expenditures are estimated to be 20% to 30% (although returns are difficult to measure with any precision).
Spillover effects (i.e., externalities) represent effects of one firm benefiting from the R&D of another firm. Spillover effects can increase IP returns significantly.
LO 21.2: Demonstrate knowledge of the investment properties of film production and distribution.
- Discuss historical revenues for film production and distribution.
- Recognize the four stages in the film production and distribution life cycle.
- Describe the costs and financing structures associated with film production and distribution.
- Recognize the four key evidence-based conclusions regarding film production profitability.
- Describe the factors and variables involved in estimating the relationship of returns to film production.
Characteristics of dilm production and distribution
- One of the most studied forms of IP because of substantial accounting data
- within IP framework, Film is considered artwork
- Total fil revenue, including home media license, was $37bb in 2007 (vs. $285bb for all copyright artwork).
- Key changes affecting mix of revenue sources:
- Increasing importance of non-U.S. revenues to the total revenue stream.
- Rapid rise and then subsequent fall of revenue from DVD sales and other similar technologies.
- Downloading and watching movies on devices such as phones and tablet
- Films move from theaters to home video and pay per view, to network and basic cable, and ultimately to television syndication over a period of six months to 5 years. Syndication can last for 10 or more years after the release of a film.
The film production life cycle consists of four key stages:
- Acquiring the rights to the story. Filmmakers must pay to license books, screenplays, and concepts.
- Preproduction period. Writing the script, casting the film, designing the sets, scouting a location, creating film production stages, and budgeting the film are part of the preproduction process.
- Production of the film (principal photography). Expenses in this stage include paying actors, producers, and directors, as well as sound-stage, catering, set construction, lodging, and other expenses.
- Postproduction period. Editing and scoring the film, creating titles and credits, special effects, and acquiring the rights to music that will be featured on the soundtrack are captured in this stage of production.
Negative costs (Film)
combined costs to create the film. The word negative does not refer to the sign of the cash flow but rather to the costs to create the negative images of the film in the predigital era.
In addition, there are the costs associated with printing the film to distribute to theaters and the costs to market the film (called P&A costs for print and advertising).
Equity financing structures to fund films include
• Slate equity financing. Outside investors, such as hedge funds and investment banks, fund sets (i.e., slates) of films. The films satisfy certain parameters in terms of risks, film budgets, and so forth. This structure spreads financial risks across several films, limiting the impact of financial losses of any one picture.
• Corporate equity. The activities of a production company are funded by corporate equity either through private placements or public stock offerings.
• Miscellaneous third party. More common for smaller, independent (i.e., indie) films, third-party investors (e.g., high-net-worth individuals and institutions) fund film costs not covered by other types of financing.
• Coproduction. Two or more companies produce a film, sharing the equity financing responsibilities, the returns, and the risks.
Debt financing structures to fund films include:
- *• Senior secured debt.** These include loans from banks and other institutions to fund production or postproduction activities such as P&A. Loans can take on several forms, including negative pickup deals (i.e., a distributor agrees to buy the film for a fixed price upon completion), foreign pre-sales (i.e., the producer sells foreign distribution rights before the film is made and payment is due upon completion of the film), and tax credits/grants [i.e., producers receive tax credits (saleable) and grants from the government for filming in a specific locale].
- *• Gap financing.** These loans finance the difference between the production budget and the senior secured debt. The loans can be collateralized by sales of unsold distribution territories.
- *• Super gap financing/junior debt.** The second level of gap financing covers the final amount that senior and gap lenders will not cover. These loans are often syndicated.
studies have identified four key conclusions when predicting revenue or profit for film in exhibition:
- Large-budget films generate more total revenue but less than average profit.
- Some stars may increase revenue, but most do not. There is evidence to suggest revenues are related to directors.
- Movie sequels generate higher revenues and lower risk than nonsequel films.
- The risk and return characteristics differ across film genres.
Opening box office revenues are not necessarily shown to predict revenues accurately, but De Vany and Walls (1999) identify a six-week inflection point after which audience numbers either disappear or notably increase.
“cash in” to “cash out” ratio
& Film returns
a simple return metric used for film that ignores the time value of money but is easy to understand.
A ratio of –1.0 implies no revenues, 0 implies a breakeven film, and a positive ratio indicates at least some profit.
- returns are similar to venture capital returns. That is, most films generate little or no profit while very few generate exceedingly high profit; returns are asymmetrical
*
Film Return Models
- academics initially adopted the fat-tailed stable Paretian distribution to model film returns because it does not have second or higher-order moments and therefore mimics the highly uncertain box office returns. However, this distribution is unable to account for the high level of skewness associated with film returns
- The four-parameter kappa (K4) distribution developed by Hosking (1994)4 is also used to model distributions with fat tails. The K4 distribution is able to assume many shapes with fat tails.
- Using film returns from 2005 to 2010, the K4 distribution is used to model probability densities of returns. The four parameters are econometrically estimated and used to form graphs that approximate the relationship between probability and return.
- The results indicate that action films, drama films, and the catch-all “other” category have the most skewness
- horror films had the lowest probability of loss (37%)