7 - Statistical Associations Flashcards

1
Q

correlation

A

measures the association between two variables

- All we need is the covariance and standard deviations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Regression

A
  • Allows to model the data
  • Can be used with more than one explanatory variable
  • Accounts for confounding
  • Produces parameters and predictions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

REGRESSION – canonical form

A

Y = a + bX + e

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

REGRESSION: the error term

A

We expect a mean for e = 0 in a good model fitting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Causation in epidemiology

A

A cause is sufficient when it inevitably produces an outcome and is termed necessary if an outcome cannot develop in its absence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

From association to causation

A
  • study has an adequate sample size
  • study is free of bias
  • Adjustment for possible confounders has been done
  • Possibility of reverse causation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Causation Criteria (Gordis) 1

A
  1. Temporal relationship
  2. Strength of the association
  3. Biologic plausibility
  4. Dose–response relationship
  5. Replication of the findings
  6. Effect of removing the exposure
  7. Extent to which alternate explanations have been considered
  8. Specificity of the association
  9. Consistency with other knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Temporal relationship

A

– The exposure precedes the outcome
• e.g. The smoking precedes the cancer.
• RCT cohort, cohort, case-control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

• Strength of the association

A

– Relative risk
• e.g. lung cancer and smoking RR = 10, for breast cancer and smoking RR = 1.5
– Stronger association is more likely to be causal, but a weak association can also be causal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

• Biologic plausibility

A

– The biological mechanism has to be plausible, e.g.
E.g in the statistical association between proximity to power lines and childhood leukaemia, there is no plausible mechanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

• Dose–response relationship (biological gradient)

A

– If risk increases with increasing exposure, it supports the notion of a causal association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

• Replication of the findings

A

– Many studies show similar effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

• Effect of removing the exposure (experiment)

A

Does the removal of the exposure alter the frequency of the outcome?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

• Extent to which alternate explanations have been considered (coherence)

A

The relationship found agrees with the current knowledge of the natural history/biology of the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Specificity of the association

A

There is a one-to-one relationship between the exposure and outcome.
– This criterion is not applicable to all exposure-disease associations because a disease may be caused by several exposures, and an exposure may cause several diseases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

• Consistency with other knowledge

A

The same findings have been observed among different populations, using different study designs and at different times.