7 - Social Control Theories Flashcards
Social Control
Practically any phenomenon that leads to conformity. Defines what is deviant to society.
- EX. smoking in society, once seen as acceptable, then gradually became more and more restricted when it was found to be bad for health.
Social Control Theories
Focus on TECHNIQUES and STRATEGIES that regulate human behaviour and lead to conformity (obedience to society’s rules).
More involved and committed one is to conventional activities and values and the greater the attachment to parents / loved ones / friends, the less likely they are to violate society’s rules and to jeopardize relationships and aspirations.
‘Net-Widening’
Social control apparatus has actually extended its grip on more people [newer soft-core deviants usually let off w/ warning are now roped into participating in alternative measures program or community service].
Social control sys has expanded as community control has supplemented rather than replaced formal institutions.
Macrosociological Theories
Explores formal systems for the control of groups such as legal system / law enforcement / laws, powerful groups in society, governmental / private social and economic directives. These types of control can be pos (inhibit rule breaking behaviour) or neg (foster oppressive, restrictive, or corrupt practices by those in power).
Focuses on broader social structures such as community structure, economic factors, ethnic or racial composition of a community, and other patterns used to characterize groups.
Microsociological Theories
Focuses on informal systems. Collect data from individuals, often guided by hypotheses that apply to individuals as well as groups.
Frequently examine / reference a person’s internal control system.
(Macro) Social Disorganization Theory
Focuses on development of high-crime areas where there is a disintegration of conventional values caused by rapid industrialization, increased immigration and urbanization.
How lack of social controls (formal and informal) contribute to delinquency and crime.
Cultural Anomie (conflict with the traditional customs of parents), leading to loosening of social controls, in turn leads to criminal behaviour.
- EX Polish Immigrants in Chicago -> older adjusted w/ existing life experience / education / etc. leading to higher conformity / lower crime. Younger had few of the older traditions, and not yet assimilated to the new ones. Rates of crime / delinquency rose.
Social Disorganization Theory claims crime, delinquency, health problems, truancy and unemployment are greater in areas near the city centre.
Park & Burgess Model (Soc Disorg.)
- Introduced principles of ecology (study of plants / animals relationship to the environment) into study of human society.
- Examined area characteristics rather than criminals for explanations of high crime rate.
- Natural urban areas called concentric zones extending out from downtown central business district of Chicago to the commuter zone at the fringes of the city. Each zone has its own structure, organization, cultural characteristics and unique inhabitants.
Social Disorganization
Breakdown of effective social bonds, family and neighbourhood associations, and social controls in the neighbourhood and communities.
Zone 1
Central Business District -> Law offices, company headquarters, retail establishments and some commercial recreation [MOST EXPENSIVE].
Zone 2
Transition Zone -> city’s poor, unskilled, and disadvantaged lived in dilapidated housing next to old factories [LEAST EXPENSIVE]. High mobility / volatility, cultural pockets / ethnic diversity, VERY UNSTABLE.
Zone 3
Blue-Collar Residential -> housed working class, people whose jobs enabled them to enjoy some city comforts offered at its fringes. More stability, duplexes, zone 2 saves to move here.
Zone 4
Middle-Income Residential -> middle class (professionals, small-business owners, and the managerial class). More ownership / less rental.
Zone 5
Commuter Residential -> satellite towns & suburbs. Lots of Wealth / Stability.
Shaw & Mckay (Soc Disorg.)
investigate crime rates in the various zones of Chicago using Park and Burgess’ model to examine how people were distributed spatially in the process of urban growth.
Highest rates of delinquency persisted in same areas of Chicago over 30+ years, even tho ethnic composition changed. Conclusion that crucial factor was not the ethnicity but rather position of group in terms of economic status and cultural values.
Also determined older boys were associated w/ younger boys in various offences and that the techniques for committing delinquent acts had been passed on through the years [Cultural Transmission].
Cultural Transmission
Delinquency was socially learned behaviour, transmitted from one generation to the next in disorganized urban areas.
Policy Implications of Social Disorganization Theory
Invest in informal social control [After school programs, better schools, rec centers, child care]
Critiques of Social Disorganization Theory
- Too focused on how crime patterns are transmitted not how they came about in the first place.
- Fails to explain why delinquents stop committing crime as they get older.
- Fails to explain why not everyone in socially disorganized areas do not commit crime / why some neighbourhoods w/ low social control seem to be insulated from crime.
- Not proper explanation of middle-class delinquency.
- Derogatory implications of term ‘dis’ organization.
Personal and Social Control
Social control theorists emphasize rational nature of human beings.
Support idea of social (external) control and personal (individual) control being important forces in keeping individuals from committing crimes. These controls contribute to understanding of both criminal and conforming behaviours.
Why don’t MORE people commit crime? Why obey the rules?
Toby’s Stake in Conformity
Correspondence of behaviour to society’s patterns, norms, or standards. One person may respond to conditions in ‘bad’ neighbourhood by becoming hostile to conventional values, knowing chances for legitimate success are poor. Other may maintain stake in conformity and remain committed to abiding by the law.
How can theory of social disorganization explain why only a few among so many slum youth commit crimes? Can explain why one neighbourhood has higher crime rate than another, but not why one particular individual becomes a hoodlum whereas another does not. Complementary role of neighbourhood social disorganization and individual’s own stake in conformity.
Reminds us that when trying to account for crime in general, we should look at both group-level explanations (social disorganization) AND individual-level explanations (stake in conformity).
Reckless’ Containment Theory
Assumes that for every individual, there exists a containing external structure and a protective internal structure, both of which provide defense, protection or insulation against delinquency.
Probability of deviance directly related to extent to which internal pushes (immediate need for gratification, restlessness and hostility), external pressures (poverty, unemployment, blocked opportunities), and external pulls are controlled by one’s inner / outer containment.
Strong self-concept (way one views themselves in relation to the world) and other internal controls plus outer control = low likelihood of deviance.
Outer Containment
Structural buffer that holds the person in bounds. Can be found in cohesion among members of a group, sense of belongingness, identification w/ one+ persons in the group, set of reasonable limits / responsibilities, and a role that provides a guide for a person’s activities.
Inner Containment
Personal control. Ensured by a good self-concept, self-control, strong ego, well developed conscience, high frustration tolerance, and high sense of responsibility.
Criticism of Reckless’ Containment Theory
- Terminology poorly defined.
- difficult to test empirically
- fails to consider why some poorly contained youth commit property VS violent crimes.
(Micro) Hirschi’s Social Bond Theory
Social Control Theory explains conformity and adherence to rules, NOT deviance.
Four social bonds that promote socialization and conformity. Stronger the bonds, less likelihood of delinquency. Weakness in any of the bonds associated w/ delinquency.
Attachment, Commitment, Involvement, and Belief.