7. Property Offenses Flashcards
what is larceny?
SPECIFIC INTENT CRIME
1) a taking
2) and carrying away (slight movement is enough)
3) of tangible personal property
4) of another with possession
5) by trespass without consent (or by consent induced by fraud)
6) with intent to permanently deprive that person of their interest in their property
what is valid “possession” for purposes of larceny?
property must be taken from the custody or possession of another (ie – if defendant had possession at the time of the taking, it’s NOT larceny but may be embezzlement)
**NOTE = if defendant only has CUSTODY and takes property, it’s larceny
what is the difference between custody and possession? (larceny)
person has possession if they were given discretionary authority over the property BUT will only have custody if they were given only limited authority over the property
what is sufficient evidence of an intent “to permanently deprive”? (larceny)
intent to create a substantial risk of loss or an intent to sell or pledge the goods to the owner
what is NOT sufficient evidence of intent to permanently deprive? (larceny)
where defendant believes that the property is theirs or where they intend only to borrow the property or keep it as repayment of a debt
when must a defendant have the intent to permanently deprive? (larceny)
when they take the property
how does larceny apply to lost, mislaid, and abandoned property?
lost or mislaid property = larceny CAN be committed
abandoned property = NO larceny
what is a “continuous trespass” for larceny purposes?
where a defendant wrongfully takes property WITHOUT the intent to permanently deprive (such as borrows an umbrella) but LATER decides to keep it, the defendant is guilty of larceny once they decide to keep it
when does a “continuous trespass” NOT amount to larceny?
where the original taking was NOT wrongful (ie–taking the umbrella, thinking it was theirs) and they later decide to keep it, their is NO larceny
what is embezzlement?
SPECIFIC INTENT CRIME
1) the intentionally fraudulent
2) conversion
3) of personal property
4) of another
5) by a person in LAWFUL possession of that property
when does intent to restore property negate embezzlement?
when the defendant intends to restore the EXACT property taken
**NOTE = intent to restore similar or substantially identical property IS STILL embezzlement (even where new money replaces old money in exact same amount)
when does conversion NOT amount to embezzlement?
where the conversion is pursuant to a claim of right to the property
** NOTE = whether the defendant took the property openly is an important factor
does the embezzler have to get the benefit?
no
does the embezzler have to carry away property?
no, mere possession is enough
what is false pretenses?
SPECIFIC INTENT CRIME
1) obtaining title
2) to personal property of another
3) by an intentional false statement of a past or existing fact or false future promise
4) with intent to defraud the other