7. Pressure Groups Flashcards
The extent of political pluralism vs elitism - The revolving-door
Positives - provide legislators and bureaucrats with useful information
Negatives - Former members of Congress (or executive) take up well-paid jobs with Washington-based lobbying firms, using their expertise and contacts to lobby their previous institution, exploiting their connections to further the interest of their pressure group clients and by doing os make large amounts of money
(works for both depending on how you argue it) E.g. The Podesta Group, started by John Podesta (former White House chief of staff to President Bill Clinton and served in the Obama White House) has headquarters just 5 blocks east of the White House
The extent of political pluralism vs elitism - The iron-triangle
Positives - Act as a sounding band for legislators at the policy formulation stage in the legislative process
Negatives - A strong relationship between pressure groups, relevant congressional committees and relevant gov department which attempts to achieve mutually beneficial policy outcomes, pluralist society, fostering an elitist view
E.g.In 2021, the NRA spent $4.2m on lobbying, according to non-partisan US research firm OpenSecrets. OpenSecrets’ figures suggest that since 2010, the NRA has directed more than $140m to pro-gun election candidates.
The extent of political pluralism vs elitism - Inequality of groups
Positives - Provide order, priorities, channell the wishes of members whom it seeks to represent and aggregate views in political debate- especially policy debate
Negatives - Leads to unfair representation of some views- the larger groups have more resources and money so their views are more favourable
E.g. the NRA vs. Handgun Control Inc, big business outweigh the environmental protectionists (elitism)
The extent of political pluralism vs elitism - Special interests vs public interests
Positives - Increase opportunities for representing minority views that would be lost in the big political parties. E.g.
Negatives - Put the interest of a small group above the interest of society as a whole.
E.g. The NAACP, NAHH (National Association for Hispanic Health) focus on a ethnic minorities and see this as ‘atomising’ American society.
Can lead to stereotypes of all black or all Jews thinking one way or want the same policies. As long as their client group is happy they rarely consider the implications for all of society. (Sup C nominee Clarence Thomas in 1991 was a conservative black who did not fit the group-think of liberal politics as espoused by the NAACP and most black pressure groups)
The extent of political pluralism vs elitism - Buying political influence
Positives -
Negatives - Lobbyists acting on behalf of business corporations write legislation for members of Congress
E.g. In 2021, the NRA spent $4.2m on lobbying, according to non-partisan US research firm OpenSecrets. OpenSecrets’ figures suggest that since 2010, the NRA has directed more than $140m to pro-gun election candidates.
The extent of political pluralism vs elitism - Using direct action
Positives - Enhance the 2 fundamental rights of freedom of speech and freedom of association. E.g. despite some pressure groups being controversial they still have a right to form like (?)
Negatives - Undemocratic
When pressure groups use unacceptable levels of violence to pursue their political agenda. Associated with pro and anti-abortion groups, environmentalists, anti-capitalists and groups on the extreme-right pursuing anti-gov agenda.
E.g. headlines in the 1990s’ of shooting, bombings & murders were conducted around abortion clinics by ‘pro-life’ groups
Types of pressure groups - Sectional pressure groups
Types of pressure groups - Causal pressure groups
Resources of pressure groups - money
The NRA was able to send over $5 million in lobbying in 2017 and contributed over $700,000 to electoral campaigns in 2018 - without money it is difficult to sustain influence
Resources of pressure groups - membership
Resources of pressure groups - access
A report in 2018 suggested that 340 former congressional staff worked for pharmaceutical groups or their lobbying firms thereby offering them valuable information on the legislative process but also bring with them address to the people they used to work with
Functions of pressure groups - representation
US citizens can have their views represented.
An important link between the public and politicians.
For many they will be the most important way in which their strongest-held views are represented.
E.g. one’s senator will have many calls upon their representative roles-a great variety of constituents, their political party and the administration- 3 of the most important.
All can have their views represented in all 3 branches of gov at the federal, state and local levels.
Functions of pressure groups - citizen participation
Increase the opportunities for participation between elections.
Many seek far greater, more frequent participation in the democratic process.
Offer an opportunity to participate in a specific policy area e.g. pro-guns, anti-abortion or whatever policy or issue a particular citizen feels deeply about.
Functions of pressure groups - agenda building
Attempt to influence political parties, legislators and bureaucrats to give priority to their members’ interests.
Attempt to bring together parts of US society e.g., business groups, religious groups, state govs and professional organisations- to achieve a common interest.
E.g. Berry and Wilcox are manufacturers and distributors of CDs, DVDs and computer software working together to get govs to pay attention to the problem of piracy of such goods. As a result, China promised to close down factories that were illegally duplicating American goods.
Functions of pressure groups - public education