7 - Directors' duties Flashcards
Can more than one duty be breached in one action?
Yes
S.170(1) states general duties are owed by who, to who?
By a director of a company, to the company
Significance of general duties being owed to ‘the company’ (2)
- Directors don’t owe duty to other persons (members, employees, creditors)
- Only company itself, and those empowered to bring claims on company’s behalf, can commence proceedings for breach of duty
2 caveats of general duties being owed by ‘a director of the company’
- Also apply to shadow directors
- Can apply to former directors
Two duties imposed by S.171
- Act in accordance with company’s constitution
- Only exercise powers for purposes for which they are conferred
Consequence of director breaching constitution
They are required to account for any gains made, or compensate company for losses sustained, as a result of breach
What is the significant point of note in how courts decide whether director has exercised powers for improper purpose?
The substantial purpose of the power being exercised is ascertained. - If this is proper, no breach has occurred, even if another less substantial purpose is improper
CA 2006 - which duty replaced duty to act bona fide in the interests of the company? - S.172 duty
- Duty to promote the success of the company *
‘[a] director of a company must act in a way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole’
Duty to promote the success of the company - objective or subjective?
Subjective insofar as the wording is ‘act in a way he considers… will promote’
However, if success of company has not been considered, then objective
What does the Act mean by ‘success of the company’?
It doesn’t really given any guidance. Companies are free to define this themselves in the articles but few do. Could be financial but a wide array of factors are at play.
Does a director breach duty to promote success of company ‘for benefit of its members as a whole’ if part of the membership’s interest don’t align with the of company?
No
6 matters to which directors must ‘have regard to’ when promoting success of company - S172(1) factors
- Likely long-term consequences of decision
- Interests of employees
- Need to foster relationships with suppliers, customers, etc.
- Impact on community and environment
- Desirability to maintain a reputation for high standards of business conduct
- Need to act fairly as between members
Remedies to breaches in S.172 duty
- Agreement is voidable at company’s instance
- Director in breach may be required to compensate the company
S.173 duty
A director must exercise independent judgement
2 exceptions to duty to exercise independent judgement
- Where director is acting in accordance with agreement which restricts future exercise of discretion
- Where director acts in a way that is authorised/required by company’s constitution
Remedies to breaches in S.173 duty
- Agreement is voidable at company’s instance
- Director in breach may be required to compensate the company
S.174 duty
A director of a company must exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence
S.174 - What standard of care, skill and diligence are directors required to meet?
That which would be exercised by a reasonably diligent person with:
- knowledge, skill and experience that would be expected of director of that company (objective)
- knowledge, skill and experience of the director (subjective)
Remedy to breaches in S.174 duty
Director will be required to compensate company
S.175 duty
Duty to avoid conflicts of interest
Re. S.175, what accounts to a conflict?
Must arise from a transaction or arrangement with a third party
Does S.175 duty only apply to current directors?
No, also applies to former directors
When (and when aren’t) former directors found to have breached S.175 duty?
No breach - simply by vacating office and setting up a rival business
Breach - property, information or opportunity of which director became aware at a time when they were director is exploited
2 instances where courts may be less likely to hold that former director has breached S.175
- Reason for resignation was not to compete
- Director resigned due to being excluded from management
S.175 conflict authorisation - what do private model arts say?
They do not invalidate directors’ ability to authorise conflicts
S.175 conflict authorisation - what do public model arts say?
They do NOT contain provision enabling directors to authorise conflict