7) CPC - Part 3 Flashcards
how to identify conflicts of interest ito P3?
- identify potential conflicts pre-acceptance of new client
- identify cause of the conflict and remain alert to changes over time
how to evaluate conflicts of interest ito P3?
- more direct the connection between matter and interest = less acceptable level
- evaluate measures which prevent unauth disclosure of confidential info
how to address conflicts of interest ito P3?
- withdraw from engagement if consent is refused
- safeguards = separate engagement teams to maintain confidentiality, reviewer to review conclusions
- disclose and obtain consent from affected parties in writing
what should be done ito disclosure for conflicts of interest ito P3?
remain alert to confidentiality
what should be done if consent cannot be obtained for conflicts of interest ito P3?
the firm can only continue the relationship if:
- the firm is not in opposing roles in their relationship with each client
- measures in place to prevent disclosure
- RITP would be likely to conclude that it is appropriate to continue
what should be documented for breaches of conf for conflicts of interest ito P3?
- nature
- measures to prevent disclosure
- why it is appropriate to continue
what does professional appointments regard?
acceptance of a new audit client and sketchy activities the potential client is doing
what are safeguards to address self-interest in professional appointments?
- assigning sufficient engagement personnel with necessary competencies
- realistic timeframe for performing engagement
- use experts
what are some safeguards for changes in professional appointment?
- get info from previous accountant (or other reasonable steps if not available)
- background investigations / info from 3P
what must be done if the potential client does not give permission for proposed PA to communicate with existing PA?
decline the appointment, unless (exceptional circumstances), proposed PA has full knowledge and is satisfied with facts
what are the requirements for the previous PA?
when asked to respond to proposed PA, comply with laws (confidentiality) and provide info honestly
how shall the proposed PA treat info gathered from the previous PA?
with the strictest confidence
what are the requirements for changes in audit / review appointments?
get relevant info from previous auditor
when should the PA use an expert for professional appointments?
if use is warranted
what threat can occur if audit fees offered are too low?
- professional competence and due care
- may be difficult for PA to perform engagement in accordance with relevant standards