6 - Sentencing Flashcards
Explain the criminal justice process up until sentencing.
The criminal justice process begins with a person being arrested and brought before the magistrates’ court. In the alternative, the magistrates’ court issues a written charge and requisition to secure their attendance.
They are asked to enter a plea:
(a) If they plead guilty, the court moves to sentence.
(b) If they plead not guilty, there is a trial and the court comes to a verdict.
If the verdict is guilty, the defendant must be sentenced.
If they are not guilty, the defendant is acquitted of the charge and is free to go.
A person who is sentenced following either a guilty plea or verdict may appeal.
What is The Sentencing Code?
The ‘Sentencing Code’ is a consolidation of existing sentencing procedure law. It brings together over 50 pieces of primary legislation relating to sentencing procedure into one single Sentencing Act 2020 (‘SA 2020’).
Parts 2 to 13 of the SA 2020 make up a code called the ‘Sentencing Code’ (the ‘Code’).
Unless referring specifically to sections 1 or 2 of the SA 2020, it is acceptable to refer to either the SA 2020 or the Code.
As well as the Code, courts also refer to sentencing guidelines published by the Sentencing Council.
What are the different types of sentence?
There are a variety of disposals available to a court when dealing with an offender; all of which meet, to a greater or lesser degree, the principles of sentencing.
They fall into custodial and non-custodial sentences.
One of the main advantages of the SA 2020 is that it brings the wide range of disposals together ‘under one roof’ as it were.
What are the purposes of sentencing for an adult?
When determining the proportionate sentence to be imposed, the court will have regard to the various purposes of sentencing.
Section 57 SA 2020- In cases involving those aged 18 and over (at the date of conviction) the court must have regard to:
(a) The punishment of offenders,
(b) The reduction of crime (including its reduction by deterrence),
(c) The reform and rehabilitation of offenders,
(d) The protection of the public, and
(e) The making of reparation by offenders to persons affected by their offences.
The purposes are given equal weight though in a particular case some may be more important than others.
How do different courts approach sentencing?
The mechanics of how a court sentences an offender is essentially the same irrespective of which court is dealing.
The only key differences are:
- The availability of certain sentences; and
- The limits to the powers of the magistrates’ and youth courts.
In order to decide both the type and length of any particular sentence, the court must assess the seriousness of the case before it. To do so, it will refer to the sentencing guidelines.
What is the procedure followed by the different courts when sentencing?
Sentencing happens once a defendant is convicted. This occurs either by the defendant entering a guilty plea or being found guilty after a trial.
The magistrates’ court, youth court and Crown Court are all courts of first instance with powers of sentence.
It is important to appreciate the difference between the maximum sentence which can be imposed for a specific offence and the maximum sentence which can be imposed by a particular court for that offence.
This means that statute also allows for defendants, where necessary and appropriate, to be committed for sentence to the Crown Court which has greater powers.
Section 14 SA 2020 for example, provides that magistrates can commit an adult for sentence to the Crown Court for offences triable either way where greater sentencing powers are required.
How does Section 14 operate in cases where the magistrates’ sentencing powers are limited?
Section 14 applies when a defendant pleads guilty to an either-way offence (e.g., burglary) in the magistrates’ court.
Magistrates can hear the case, but their sentencing powers are limited:
- Under s.224 SA 2020, they can impose a maximum imprisonment of 12 months for an either-way offence.
If the magistrates deem the offence too serious for their sentencing powers, they may commit the defendant to the Crown Court for sentencing.
The Crown Court has broader powers and can impose the maximum sentence for burglary of a dwelling, which is 14 years under s.9 of the Theft Act 1968.
What is the process for sentencing in cases involving summary-only offences?
For summary-only offences, sentencing is handled exclusively by the magistrates’ court:
- If the defendant pleads guilty, they are sentenced in the magistrates’ court.
- If the defendant pleads not guilty but is found guilty after trial, sentencing must still take place in the magistrates’ court.
Summary-only offences cannot be sent to the Crown Court for sentencing under any circumstances.
How are either-way offences sentenced depending on the court and plea?
If the defendant pleads guilty in the magistrates’ court, they may be sentenced in the magistrates’ court, or they could be sent to the Crown Court for sentencing.
If the defendant pleads guilty in the Crown Court, they must be sentenced in the Crown Court and cannot be sent back to the magistrates’ court.
If the defendant pleads not guilty:
- If the case stays in the magistrates’ court for trial, sentencing may occur there, or the defendant could be sent to the Crown Court for sentencing.
- If the case is sent to the Crown Court for trial or the defendant elects to be tried there, the defendant must be sentenced in the Crown Court and cannot be sent back to the magistrates’ court.
What is the sentencing process for indictable-only offences?
Indictable-only offences are sent directly to the Crown Court:
- If the defendant pleads guilty at the Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing (PTPH) in the Crown Court, they will be sentenced there.
- Once an indictable-only case is in the Crown Court, it cannot be sent back to the magistrates’ court.
For indictable-only offences, sentencing always occurs in the Crown Court.
How is a defendant sentenced when they plead guilty but dispute the prosecution’s version of events?
When a defendant pleads guilty but disagrees with facts asserted by the prosecution, they may submit a written basis of plea to explain their position.
The prosecution will review the basis of plea to decide if it is acceptable:
- If accepted by the prosecution, the court will then proceed to consider if the basis is acceptable.
- If the court is satisfied with the basis, they will sentence the defendant on that basis of plea.
- If the court does not find the basis acceptable, a Newton Hearing will be required to determine the facts.
What happens if the prosecution does not accept the defence’s basis of plea?
If the prosecution rejects the basis of plea, the judge will assess the basis to decide if it is absurd:
- If the judge finds it absurd, sentencing will proceed on the prosecution’s version of events.
If not absurd, the judge must determine if the basis would make a material difference to sentence:
- If it would not make a material difference, the defendant is sentenced on the defence’s basis of plea.
- If it would make a material difference, a Newton Hearing is held to resolve the factual dispute before sentencing.
When must a court hold a Newton Hearing?
Where a defendant pleads guilty on a basis that will make a material difference to sentence, the court must hold a Newton hearing to decide the factual basis upon which it should pass sentence (R v Newton).
What is the purpose and process of a Newton hearing in criminal court?
A Newton hearing is held when a defendant pleads guilty but disputes significant facts affecting the severity of their sentence.
In the Magistrates’ Court, it is presided over by magistrates or a District Judge, similar to a trial. In the Crown Court, it is conducted by a Judge without a jury, marking one of the few instances where a Crown Court Judge serves as both the arbiter of law and fact.
The prosecution presents an opening speech and calls evidence, with witnesses cross-examined by the defence.
The defendant can provide evidence, call witnesses, and both parties may make a closing speech to the Judge.
The Judge must determine if the prosecution has proven its version of events beyond reasonable doubt.
- If proven, the defendant is sentenced based on the prosecution’s facts.
- If not proven, sentencing is based on the defendant’s version, as outlined in their basis of plea.
What impact does a Newton hearing have on the defendant’s guilty plea credit, and what are the reasons for this adjustment?
If the prosecution’s case is proven beyond reasonable doubt at the Newton hearing, the defendant:
- Loses part of the credit for their guilty plea.
- The Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea guideline states that the reduction available at the point of plea is usually halved.
- If witnesses are called, this reduction may decrease further.
Rationale:
- The defendant’s actions led to additional court time that could have been saved due to their plea.
- Witnesses, who would have been spared by the plea, were required to give evidence at the Newton hearing.
How does the principle of totality influence sentencing decisions when dealing with multiple offences?
The principle of totality requires a court to ensure the total sentence for multiple offences is just and proportionate.
This doesn’t simply involve adding individual sentences together. The Judge must consider whether to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences based on the circumstances:
- Concurrent sentences are typically used when offences arise from the same facts.
- Consecutive sentences are usually applied when offences stem from different facts.
How long can a court defer sentencing for, and why would they do this?
A court can defer sentence for up to six months, the idea being that the defendant is allowed this time to prove to the court that D has either ‘changed’ or that the offence was an absolute ‘one-off’ and thus allowing D the ability to present to the court at the end of the deferral period in a much better light, and often, receive a lighter sentence as a result.
The deferral period cannot be extended save for where the magistrates’ court defers sentence for a period, at the end of which they commit to the Crown Court for sentence, the Crown Court then has the option of deferring for a further six month period.
How can a defendant seek an indication of sentence in the magistrates’ court?
In the magistrates’ court, a defendant can request a sentence indication if:
- The offence is either-way.
- The court has accepted jurisdiction during the allocation process.
The court may provide an indication, though it is not required to do so.
- If given, the indication can only specify if the sentence would be custodial or non-custodial.
The indication is only binding if the defendant subsequently pleads guilty.
How does a defendant obtain a Goodyear indication in the Crown Court?
In the Crown Court, a defendant may request a Goodyear indication regarding their sentence either before the Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing (PTPH) or at any stage before the jury’s verdict.
Before seeking an indication, the defendant must:
- Accept the prosecution facts or have an agreed written basis of plea with the prosecution and court.
- Instruct their counsel to ask for an advance indication of sentence.
The judge has discretion to decide whether or not to provide a Goodyear indication.
Provide a summary of the overview of sentencing.
This element considered:
The principles of sentencing contained in the Sentencing Act 2020:
- The purpose of sentencing
- Sentencing powers in both the magistrates’ court and the Crown Court
- The purpose of Newton hearings.
- Totality of sentence
- Indications of sentence
What is the starting point for the court when considering the seriousness of the offence?
In order to decide on the appropriate sentence, the court will consider the Sentencing Code 2020 alongside any relevant sentencing guidelines.
The court must determine the seriousness of the offence.
The starting point to determine seriousness is to consider culpability and harm.
Section 63 SA 2020: Where a court is considering the seriousness of any offence, it must consider -
(a) The offender’s culpability in committing the offence, and (b) Any harm which the offence (i) Caused, (ii) Was intended to cause, or (iii) Might foreseeably have caused.
When must a court consider the thresholds for imposing custodial or community orders, and what conditions must be met under Sections 230 and 204 of the SA 2020?
Where appropriate the court must consider whether either statutory threshold has been passed to justify imposing a custodial or community order.
Section 230 SA 2020:
The court must not pass a custodial sentence unless it is of the opinion that—
(a) The offence, or
(b) The combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it,
Was so serious that neither a fine alone nor a community sentence can be justified for the offence’
Section 204 SA 2020:
(2)The court must not make a community order unless it is of the opinion that—
(a) The offence, or
(b) The combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it, was serious enough to warrant the making of such an order.
What are the definitions of culpability and harm when determining sentence?
Culpability:
Culpability is essentially blameworthiness and is assessed with reference to the offender’s role, level of intention and/or premeditation and the extent and sophistication of planning.
The mere presence of a factor that is inherent in the offence should not be used in assessing culpability – so for example, intention to cause serious harm is a necessary element in a section 18 OAPA. What would increase culpability might be how the injuries were inflicted e.g. with a weapon.
Harm:
Harm is an assessment of the damage caused to the victim.
So, in an assault it is a consideration of how injured the victim was and whether the assault was sustained or repeated.
In a theft it will be assessed by the financial loss resulting from the theft and any additional harm suffered by the victim or anyone else, for example injury or emotional distress.
What are the rules for the court regarding Sentencing Guidelines?
Every court MUST follow any sentencing guidelines which are relevant to the offender’s case unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.
Sentencing guidelines are available for most of the significant offences sentenced in the magistrates’ court Sentencing guidelines for use in the magistrates’ courts and for a wide range of offences in the Crown Court Sentencing guidelines for use in Crown Court.
There are also overarching guidelines on general sentencing issues and principles such as Sentencing children and young people.
Where no offence-specific sentencing guideline exists, courts will refer to the General guideline: overarching principles. Judges in the Crown Court might also refer to Court of Appeal judgments to look at how sentences have been reached for similar cases.
The General guideline can also be used with offence-specific guidelines where factors are not covered, and overarching guidance is required.