6: PRINCIPLES OF OPERATIVE LAPAROSCOPY Flashcards
Discuss double click test
Used with Veress needle to assess for appropriate intraabdominal entry
Palpable and audible click of spring-loaded obturator as the needle passes through layers of the abdominal wall
Double click test at umbilicus
2 clicks - Fascia, peritoneum
Double click test at LUQ
3 clocks - anterior fascia, posterior fascia, peritoneum
Explain saline aspiration test
Attach syringe to veress needle
If blood aspirated - intravascular placement
If feces aspirated - in bowel
Nothing aspirated - appropriate entry
Describe saline injection test
Attach syringe to veress needle
If high resistance or no flow - pre-peritoneal placement or adhesive disease
Minimal or no resistance - proper placement
Describe hanging drop test
Saline in top of veress needle hub - if fluid moves freely down without pressure or movement, proper placement
If fluid does not freely flow, obstruction is indicated (ex: improper placement with pre-peritoneal location or adhesive disease)
Intra-abdominal pressure test
Normal entry pressure 0-7mmHg
Average with Veress needle 4mmHg +/-2
Tubing should be attached and CO2 should be flowing
<10mmHg indicates correct placement
Normal entry pressure
0-7mmHg
<10 mmHg indicates correct placement
Average intraabdominal pressure with veress needle
4mmHg +/-2
Highest sensitivity test for intraperitoneal entry
Intraabdominal pressure
Sensitivity of intraabdominal pressure test for complications
79%
Sensitivity of intraabdominal pressure test for pre-peritoneal entry
100%
Tests with poor sensitivity/ppv for intraabdominal pressure
Double click test
Saline aspiration
Hanging drop test
Relative contraindications to umbilicial placement
Periumbilical adhesions
Abdominal mesh
Extremes of weight
Umbilical hernia
Pregnancy (2nd tri)
Large pelvic mass
Which entry is recommended?
SURGEON PREFERENCE - insufficient evidence to recommend one over the other
Indications for Palmer’s point
Periumbilical adhesions
Hernia repair with mesh
Failed umbilical entry
Extreme obesity (umbilicus shifts significantly caudal)
Pregnancy
Distance of Palmer’s point from Stomach
4.5cm
Distance of Palmer’s point from L lobe of liver
5.6cm
Distance of Palmer’s point from pancreas
9cm
Distance of Palmer’s point from spleen
11.6cm
Distance of Palmer’s point from L kidney
14cm
Contraindications to Palmer’s point
Bariatric surgery (ex: gastric bypass, gastric sleeve)
Splenectomy/prior spleen surgery
HSM
Portal hypertension
Gastropancreatic masses
Upper abdominal adhesions
How to do posterior vaginal fornix entry
Small colpotomy, then place veress need into cavity, insufflate and then can do abdominal trochar entry
Contraindications to posterior vaginal fornix entry
If mass is filling posterior cul-de-sac or if obliterated cul-de-sac
Overall rate of LSC complications
5%
% of LSC injuries not recognized intraoperatively
25%
Fraction of LSC injuries that occur at time of initial abdominal entry
1/3
Incidence of LSC entry injuries
0.3%
Most common location for LSC entry injuries
Umbilicus
Frequency of umbilical adhesions with no prior surgical hx
0.68%
Frequency of umbilical adhesions with hx LSC surgery
1.6%
Frequency of umbilical adhesions with hx low transverse incision
19.8%
Frequency of umbilical adhesions with MLV incision
51.7%
Correlation between umbilicus and aortic bifurcation in normal weight patient
Umbilicus 4mm caudad to aortic bifurcation
Correlation between umbilicus and aortic bifurcation in overweight patient
Umbilicus ~2cm below aortic bifurcation
Correlation between umbilicus and aortic bifurcation in obese patient
Umbilicus ~3cm below aortic bifurcation
Recommended angle in degrees of umbilical entry in normal weight patient
30deg
Recommended angle in degrees of umbilical entry in overweight patient
45deg
Recommended angle in degrees of umbilical entry in obese patient
90deg