6 - multi sensory integration II Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

why do we have sensory conflicts?

A

perceptual limits: senses aren’t perfect e.g. visual resolution determined by spacing of photoreceptors in the fovea

neural noise: none of our senses are completely fool proof, we don’t always get a clean signal e.g. synaptic noise

cognitive resource limits: e.g. attention which strengthens signal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

evidence for visual dominance?

A

create sensory conflict using reducing lens, so object looks small but feels big

participants thought object was small, therefore vision dominates perceived object size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how does attention interact with multi sensory integration?

A

attention can affect how multi sensory signals are integrated (McGurk effect)

multi sensory signals can guide attention (reading papers with read aloud on allows us to read faster)

multi sensory integration is probably both pre and post attentive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are theories of sensory conflicts?

A
  1. visual dominance
  2. modality precision
  3. weighting based on uncertainty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the modality precision hypothesis?

A

the dominance of modality depends on task:
- spatial task: vision
- temporal task: audition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

evidence of the modality precision hypothesis

A

participants presented with flashes and auditory beeps during flashes

if there was 1 flash and 2 beeps, participants perceived this as 2 flashes

audition dominated vision in temporal task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

evidence of weighting based on uncertainty?

A

present virtual bar with sensory conflict between haptic and visual information

compare against bar without sensory conflict

determine point of subjective equality (PSE) - point where people cannot distinguish which is taller

then we manipulate sensory uncertainty of visual feedback

more visual noise moves PSE towards haptic size

when uncertainty of visual information increases, dominance of vision decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a normative model?

A

how a problem should be solved (optimal solution)
- based on theory
- establishes bounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is a process model?

A

how a problem is actually solved
- based on data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is a normative model of multi sensory integration?

A

Q: how should we solve problem of sensory integration

A: pick integration method that minimises uncertainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how is variability affected by sensory uncertainty

A

high variance = high sensory uncertainty

low variance = low sensory uncertainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the ideal solution to sensory conflict? (normative model)

A

haptic and visual stimuli create a combined signal that is less variable and uncertain than either estimate alone

when both signals have same amount of uncertainty, combined signals is in the middle

if signals have different amount of uncertainty, combined signal is biased towards less uncertain stimuli, no longer in the middle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how to test how people actually solve sensory conflict?

A

compare PSE to what computational model predicts is PSE (combined signal of both stimuli)

found that humans use uncertainty during multi sensory integration, they also follow optimal sensory integration rules (normative model)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly