6. Leader Flashcards

1
Q

Differences between a leader and a team in perceptions of the same social stimulus

A

Leader-team perceptual distance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Effects of perceptual distance

A

Goal accomplishment
Constructive conflict
Decision-making autonomy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Greater perceptual differences are associated with decreases in team performance

A

This effect is strongest when a team’s perceptions are more positive than the leader’s are (as opposed to the reverse)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Perceptual distance between a leader and a team regarding goal accomplishment and constructive conflict

A

Nonlinear relationship with team performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A group of members with interdependent interaction and mutually shared responsibility for achieving specified outcomes

A

Work teams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Example of perceptual difference importance

A

The team and the leader had very divergent perspectives regarding the actual progress made to date. Producing critical differences of opinion about the necessary priorities moving forward. As a result, the team and leader reached a considerable stalemate over how to proceed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Leadership and team processes reciprocally influence each other

A

It is necessary for a team and its leader to develop an awareness of each other’s perspective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Leaders influence team effectiveness through their effects on four general types of team processes

A

Cognitive
Motivational
Affective
Coordination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Leader-team perceptual differences in team cognitive processes

A

Detrimental to team performance because these differences hinder the team from maximizing collective cognition and reaching its full potential

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Human beings experience other individuals phenomenologically because of the complexity of social stimuli and limitations in our information-processing capabilities

A

Social perceptual theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The perceptual process is influenced by

A

Many individual differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Individual differences

A

Variations in experience, personality, and cognitive complexity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The perceptual process influences

A

Interests, values, and mental scripts.

These factors shape the frames and lenses through which people perceive and interpret the world, leading them to attend to certain stimuli but filter out others, or to recall some features and fail to mentally store others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Given that individuals who work together in organizations often vary dramatically in experience, personality, skills, and values; and that the motivation to attend to stimuli may vary, any given set of perceivers may have different perceptions of the same phenomenon in the workplace

A

Teams and their external leaders may be particularly prone to forming different perceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Perceptions help shape behavioral inputs into

A

Team processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The degree to which there are significant variations in perceptions of the same social stimulus

A

Perceptual distance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Large vs. Small perceptual distances

A

Large perceptual distance imply great variations in perceptions of the same stimulus

Small perceptual distances imply only small differences in perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

We focus on how much a leader’s perceptions differ from the perceptions of the team he or she leads

A

And how these differences relate to team performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Leader’s perception is

A

The perceptions of the leader external to the team, to whom the team reports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Leader-team perceptual difference is an impediment to

A

Collective cognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Input-process-output model for groups

A

Process describes those things that go on in the group that influence effectiveness

22
Q

Leaders influence team effectiveness through

A

Their effects on group process

23
Q

A team possesses cognitive properties that are distinct from a combination of the cognitions of individual members

A

Collective cognition

24
Q

Phases of collective cognition

A

Accumulation
Interaction
Examination
Accomodation

25
Q

Accumulation (Collective Cognition Phase 1)

A

Groups acquire, perceive, filter, and store information

26
Q

Interaction (Collective Cognition Phase 2)

A

Retrieving, exchanging, and structuring information

27
Q

Examination (Collective Cognition Phase 3)

A

Members negotiate, interpret, and evaluate information

28
Q

Accommodation (Collective Cognition Phase 4)

A

Groups integrate, decide, and act on the information

29
Q

The cognitive properties of groups, including efficient movement through cycles of collective cognition, serve as significant predictors of group effectiveness

A

Movement from one major process phase to another is sometimes linear and sequential, but there can also be reciprocal relationships among phases and even a reversal of the cycle

30
Q

Differences in leader-team perceptions are detrimental to collective cognition because

A

The misunderstandings that arise distract the parties involved and use up valuable resources (time, energy, possibly even capital) that could otherwise be applied directly to achieving performance objectives

31
Q

Greater levels of perceptual distance deters the team from utilizing needed catalysts to collective cognition

A

Catalysts: feedback received about performance, recognition of conflict among members, and clarification of decision-making roles

32
Q

Teams progress through phases of collective cognition by making use of catalysts to

A

Break apart routine and habitual patterns of information use and behavior

33
Q

Comprises the core of our argument

A

The effect of perceptual distance on the catalytic mechanisms.

A leader can assist a team in making use of catalysts, but if the leader and the team do not have common perceptions of relevant phenomena, they are unlikely to take advantage of them

34
Q

Teams and their leaders must

A

Communicate, coordinate, and interact regarding a myriad of issues related to work output and team functioning

35
Q

This perception is important in determining how well a team will make use of feedback-related catalysts for collective cognition

A

Goal Accomplishment

36
Q

Prompts examination activities (negotiating, interpreting, and evaluating knowledge) and enables consensus (agreement within the team) which results in better integration of knowledge into action (accomodation activities)

A

Constructive conflict

37
Q

When roles are clearly defined, each member understands where expertise, responsibility, and accountability lie within the team

A

Decision-making roles (Autonomy)

38
Q

Results: Leader-team perceptual distance is an important consideration in work teams

A

Leader-team perceptual distance had a greater predictive capacity than did within-team perceptual distance

39
Q

Results: Perceptual differences between a leader and a team should not simply be disregarded as error but can, in and of themselves, have effects on the functioning of teams

A

Although the incremental variance explained by leader-team perceptual distance is relatively small

40
Q

Results: For goal accomplishment and constructive conflict, performance is higher when leader-team perceptual distance is low

A

There is more of a performance advantage when the leader’s perceptions are slightly higher than the team’s perception than vice-versa

41
Q

Results: For goal accomplishment, performance is higher overall when the leader’s and the team’s perceptions are high rather than low

A

For constructive conflict, there is a positive relationship with team performance.

When the highest levels of constructive conflict are reached, there is a negative relationship.

42
Q

Results: For decision-making autonomy, performance is highest when both parties (leader and team) rate decision-making autonomy high.

And becomes progressively lower as ratings become more incongruent.

A

The relationship between the leader’s ratings and the team’s rating (of decision-making autonomy) and performance are not curvilinear

43
Q

Results: When leaders had slightly higher perceptions of goal accomplishment, this resulted in a slight performance advantage.

Whereas when teams had slightly higher perceptions of goal accomplishment, this resulted in a slight performance disadvantage.

A

When the team considers that its knowledge accumulation is sufficient, constructive criticism by the leader threatens the team’s sense of efficacy.

44
Q

Results: A performance advantage occurred when the leader had slightly higher perceptions of constructive conflict than the team.

A disadvantage occurred when the team had higher perceptions than did the leader.

A

When the leader is not comfortable with how disagreements are being handled by the team, the leader may intervene where he or she is not needed.

45
Q

Results: Solution to leader’s annoying or confusing intervention

A

Shared perceptions of goal accomplishment and constructive conflict between the leader and the team.

46
Q

Practical implications: Introduce and support procedures that ascertain whether the leader’s and the team’s perceptions of relevant stimuli agree

A

Suitable procedures can vary in degree of formality ranging from standardized, scheduled procedures to informal, discretionary ones.

47
Q

Practical implications: The leader and team could determine clear, explicit, and measurable criteria around goal accomplishment at the start of projects

A

To reduce the perceptual distance regarding goal accomplishment

48
Q

Practical implications: Agree on metrics that track the ongoing progress toward goals and mark milestones for discussing progress and providing feedback

A

Periodic surveys might then be administered to determine if the leader’s and the team’s perceptions agree

49
Q

Practical implications: Parties might also supplement this feedback process with informal dialogue sessions between the leader and the team that are fixed points on the project’s schedule

A

Feedback built around dialogue rather than simply survey instruments has the potential to provide a greater richness of data and offer more profound insights into why perceptual differences exist and how to resolve them.

50
Q

Conclusion: Teams and their leaders need to become more aware of the role of perceptions and their influence on team outcomes

A

This research demonstrates that leader-team perceptual distance is an important consideration in work teams

51
Q

Conclusion: Unfortunately, in the quest to be ever more productive, leaders often become focused largely on task accomplishment. As a byproduct, they fail to reflect on the impact of psychological forces and cognitive processes that may ultimately hinder what they are seeking…
An effective team.

A

To overlook such forces, however, means that a team may pay significant price when it comes to realizing its full pontential