6) Equal Protection Flashcards

1
Q

EPC: const basis: states

A

14A EPC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

EPC: const basis: feds

A

5A DPC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

EP: most basic rule

A

EP requires the gvt to justify when it discriminates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

EP analysis

A

1) ID type of discrim
2) what’s standard of review
3) apply (for tailoring, consider who is under/over included)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

standard?: disparate impact

A

if facially neutral, NOT discrim, and gets RBR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

standard?: disparate impact: exceptions

A

both of these ARE discrim and get SS:

1) INTENTIONAL disparate impact (must be gvt’s purpose not just that they knew)
2) disrcrim APPLICATION of neutral test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

RBR: rule

A

1) BOP P
2) gvt action is not rationally related to
3) any legit gvt interest
4) (can include purported/not actul interests)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

RBR: when use

A

all classifications not falling under strict or intermediate scrutiny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

age: standard?

A

RBR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

disability; standard?

A

RBR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

alienage? standard?

A

RBR if done by Congress

SS if done by states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

RBR: result

A

gvt usually wins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

sexual orientation: standard?

A

RBR

BUT: no legit gvt purpose (rare thing that can pass RBR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

intermediate scrutiny: test

A

1) gvt must show (BOP)
2) substantial relation
3) to an important interest
4) which must be the actual interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

intermediate scrutiny: when use

A

1) sex

2) illegitimacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

strict scrutiny: rule

A

1) gvt must show (BOP)
2) necessary (no other way) to achieve
3) compelling gvt interest
4) which is the actual interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

strict scrutiny: “necessary” synonyms

A

narrowly tailored, least restrictive alternative)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

strict scrutiny: result

A

gvt usually fails

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

strict scrutiny: whe use

A

1) race
2) alienage by state
3) ntl origin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

de jure segregation: def + result

A

segregation by law

almost always unconst, def unconst if stigmatizing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

de facto segregation: def + result

A

seg by private choice (not by operation of law):

NO const problem bc no state action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

school segregation: currently

A

affirmative duty to eliminate past intentional race discrim of schools (not by classifying/moving individual students based on race)

bussing constitutional for htis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

times when racial classification may pass strict scrutiny

A

1) exceptional circs (race riot)

2) affirmative action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

affirmative action: def

A

classification intended to benefit historically discriminated group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
affirmative action: compelling interests
1) remedying state's past discrim | 2) diversity in higher ed (only)
26
affirmative action: 1) remedying state's past discrim: how to narrowly taiilor?
benefits go to same industry where there was discrim
27
affirmative action: diversity in higher ed: how to narrowly tailor?
race can be one factor among many, no fixed weight (quotas is not narrowly tailored)
28
alienage discrim by states: test
SS (wrt resident aliens)
29
alienage discrim by states: exception
public function exception: gvt jobs involving discretion: ok USCs only 1) police 2) gvt officials 3) pub school teachers but NOT purely ministerial function: notary
30
alienage discrim by states: illegal aliens
RBR if based on lawful presence
31
alienage discrim by states: illegal aliens: exceptions
1) alien children: intermediate scrutiny | 2) im preemption -- states can't enact own im policies
32
illegitimacy: examples
IS, usu fail (no impt gvt interest) | denying welfare, or worker's comp death benefits = both unconst
33
sex discrim: held unconst bc dn pass intermediate scrutiny
estate administration military housing benefits alimony drinking age
34
sex discrim: single sex education: "rule"
single sex education (prob ok if avail for all, but no unique opportunity)
35
sex discrim: held const bc did pass IS
1) draft | 2) statutory rape laws setting higher age of consent for women (actual bio basis)
36
sex discrim: general rule
more liekly to be const if based on real biological basis less likely to be const if based on stereoypes
37
gender affirmative action: rule
IS scrutiny --> it's ok to make up for past discrim by ANYONE (dnn race/SS)
38
wealth: scrutiny?
RBR
39
domestic travel: scrutiny?
SS
40
voting: scrutiny?
SS
41
sexual orientation: scrutiny?
RBR-ish: majority has never said that passing RBR is enough to make the law ok, bc have always held that dn pass even RBR
42
sexual orientation: DOMA case
def of "marriage" and "spouse" lacked const legit purpose bc was jsust movitaved by animus which violates DP
43
sexual orientation: Marriage
EPC + DPC both protect marriage
44
privileges + immunities: 2 sources
1) 14A 2) Art 4 Sec 2 (both against states)
45
14A priv + immunities: rule
"no state shall make or enforce any law which shall bridge the P or I of citizens of the US"
46
14A P+I: scope
"citizens," so NOT corporations, not aliens
47
14A priv + immunities: rights
1) travel (interestate + move) 2) petition Congress 3) vote for fed ofices 4) assemble 5) enter pub lands
48
Art 4 P+I: rule
Art 4 S 2: "the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privielges and immunities of citizens in the several states"
49
Art 4 P+I: aka
comity clause
50
Art 4 P+I: def
prohibits states from discriminating against nonresidents, re activities fundamental to the national union
51
Art 4 P+I: test (+ gloss)
substantial relation to substantial state interest | desire to favor locals is NOT a substantial interest
52
Art 4 P+I: scope
"citizens" -- no corps, no aliens corps can protect against oos discrim by DCC
53
Art 4 P+I: held INVALID
1) commercial licenses (fee higher) 2) commuter tax only for nonresidents 3) abortion (only locals) 4) hiring preference (all or private ers)
54
Art 4 P+I: held VALID
1) recreational licenses | 2) state's purpose is preserving in-state nat resources
55
contract clause: rule
Art 1 S 10: "No state shall...pass any...law impairing obligation of contracts"
56
contract clause: scope
1) state only not fed ("no state") 2) legislation only not court decs ("pass any law" 3) only existing ks!
57
contract clause: test
to decide if can modify the existing k, bal: 1) severity of impairment of k right, vs 2) importance of public interest
58
contract clause: result
state can usu modify ks, but less likely if state trying to get out of its own k
59
ex post facto laws: scope
against states AND fed
60
ex post facto: kinds prevented
1) new crime 2) more punishment 3) less evidence needed to convict 4) longer limitations period AFTER EXPIRATION
61
ex post facto: kinds prevented: less evidence needed: dx
(ok quasi procedural) | but making a broader inadmissibility standard does not violate EXPF clause
62
bills of attainder: scope
against states and fed
63
bill of attainder: def
1) legislation 2) that punshes 3) w/o trial 4) named indivs, or readily identifiable group 5) for past conduct
64
bill of attainder: example
YES a bill of attainder where made crime for communist to be officer of labor union (was like punishment)