6. Conflict/communication Flashcards

1
Q

Define conflict

A

“…incompatible activities, that is, the actions of one person…interfere, obstruct, or in some ways get in the way of the actions of another…” (interpersonal conflict)
Conflict is the process in which one party perceives that its interests are being opposed or negatively affected by another party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interpersonal conflict

A

when two interacting people have incompatible needs, goals, values, or approaches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

intragroup conflict

A

when two or more people have incompatible needs, goals, values, or approaches for group goals, activities, leadership or processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

intergroup conflict

A

When two or more groups have incompatible requirements for resources, tasks, processes, or information
e.g., departments in the same organization; management and unions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

international conflict

A

between states at the global level. Can include incompatible requirements for power and resources, but also contrasting values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sources of conflict

A
incompatible grops
scarce resources
poor communication
competitive reward system
different expertise
vale differences (political, moral)
Differing personal styles
Differing cultural practices
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

task conflict

A

(also called substantive conflict)
may arise over task outcomes or processes
Sometimes positive: small amounts may increase innovation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Relationship conflict

A

negative judgements about people’s personal styles, values, tastes
is almost always negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does task conflict and relationship conflict overlap?

A

Task conflict may be taken personally, leading to relationship conflict

This is more likely where…

  • trust is between people is low
  • discussions are loud and robust, suggesting stronger emotional involvement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When can conflict be positive?

A

conflicts are positive only under very narrow conditions

  1. Conflicts are task-related
  2. Conflicts are not (or do not become) about relationships
  3. Task-related conflicts should be at most moderate (not strong)
  4. Each party’s initial position/view is sub-optimal. i.e., there is a better solution that the conflict might uncover
  5. Trust and psychological safety are high
  6. Parties take a problem-solving approach to conflict
  7. Positive effects are restricted to innovation and decision quality in that setting
    - not considering longer-term effects, e.g., for later interactions
    - not considering other effects, e.g., for participants’ health and wellbeing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

attribution theory

A

explanations for why people act the way they do

involves correspondent inference bias and actor-observer effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Correspondent inference bias

A

(“fundamental attribution error”)

We tend to attribute behaviours of others relatively more to personal factors than to situational factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Actor-observer effect

A

We tend to attribute behaviours of others relatively more to personal factors, but our own behaviours relatively more to situational factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Social exchange theory

A

Perceived unfair balance of rewards and costs in relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Equity theory

A

lack of distributive justice

lack of procedural justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is a lack of distributive justice in the equity theory of conflict?

A

perceived unfair allocation of resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is a lack of procedural justice in the equity theory of conflict?

A

perceived unfair process for allocation of resources

perceived unfair opportunities for views to be heard and considered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

accommodating; yielding

A

high Concern about relationship and/or
others’ outcomes AND
low Concern about task and/or own outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Collaborating; Problem-solving;

A

high Concern about relationship and/or
others’ outcomes AND
high Concern about task and/or own outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Competing;

Forcing

A

low Concern about relationship and/or
others’ outcomes AND
high Concern about task and/or own outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Avoiding;

Withdrawal

A

low Concern about relationship and/or
others’ outcomes AND
low Concern about task and/or own outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Compromising

A

medium Concern about relationship and/or
others’ outcomes AND
medium Concern about task and/or own outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Accommodating/

Yielding is suitable when

A
  • You want to prevent chances of conflict escalating

- Your position is weak (e.g., the other party has more power)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

disadvantages of Accommodating/

Yielding

A

-Increases expectation you will yield in future conflicts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Compromising is suitable when

A
  • Time pressure

- Similar power and lack of trust

26
Q

disadvantages of Compromisiing

A

-Makes the search for more creative and valued options less likely

27
Q

Competing/ Forcing is suitable when

A
  • You have strong convictions about an issue
  • Pressing time constraints
  • You have greater power
28
Q

Disadvantages of competing/forcing

A
  • May damage longer-term relationships

- Impasse if others adopt same style

29
Q

Collaborating/ Problem-solving is suitable when

A
  • There is trust between parties

- Issues are complex

30
Q

Disadvantages of Collaborating/ Problem-solving

A

-The other party can gain advantage from information

31
Q

Avoiding/ Withdrawal is suitable when

A
  • You have high uncertainty about how to respond

- Conflict is generating heightened emotions

32
Q

Disadvantages of Avoiding/ Withdrawal

A
  • Conflict unresolved

- Increase frustration in other party

33
Q

what is the process of managing conflict constructively according to the conflict management model?

A

mutual benefit relationships -> open-minded discussion -> constructive conflict

34
Q

what does mutual benefit relationships involve in the conflict management model?

A

Dual concerns
Social value
Cooperative goal

Contexts where people know they will benefit from addressing conflict

35
Q

what does Open-minded discussion involve in the conflict management model?

A

Integrative style
Problem solving
Motivated information processing
Constructive controversy

Willingness to search for and fairly consider different ideas, and integrate them into acceptable solutions

36
Q

what does construcutive conflict involve in the conflict management model?

A

Quality resolutions
Strong relationships
Individual development

Conflicts where the benefits outweigh the costs

37
Q

What is the foundation for constructive conflict management?

A

open-minded discussion

38
Q

what is the cycle for engaging in open-minded discussion?

A

-> Express -> understand -> agree -> integrate ->

goes in a circle

39
Q

what is involved in EXPRESS in engaging in an open-minded discussion?

A

Each person/party communicates their needs, ideas, feelings, expectations

40
Q

what is involved in UNDERSTAND in engaging in an open-minded discussion?

A

Ask questions to gain more information and deepen knowledge of other views

41
Q

what is involved in INTEGRATE in engaging in an open-minded discussion?

A

Discussion to incorporate people’s views and needs, and to identify solutions that meet all people/parties, at least to some degree

42
Q

what is involved in AGREE in engaging in an open-minded discussion?

A

Communicate public acceptance of solution and discuss implementation

43
Q

Is the open-minded discussion model only effective for substantive conflicts?

A

“open-minded discussions of anger can strengthen relationships and restore respect”

  • Angered person communicates why they think another has frustrated them, and the reasons for this belief
  • Parties clarify their intentions and address misunderstandings
  • Apologies (where applicable) and commitments to changing behaviour
  • Reduced anger and improved interpersonal/group functioning
44
Q

Apologies

A

Apologies can help de-escalate conflict and repair relationships

45
Q

what are the 6 components of apologies?

A
  1. Expressing regret
  2. explanation
  3. accept responsibility
  4. declare repentance
  5. Propose a remedy
  6. request forgiveness
46
Q

what is EXPRESSING REGRET in the 6 components of apologies?

A

Saying sorry for the offence

47
Q

what is EXPLANATION in the 6 components of apologies?

A

Explain why the event occurred, esp. if unintentional

48
Q

what is ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY in the 6 components of apologies?

A

Demonstrate you understand what you did was wrong

49
Q

what is DECLARE REPENTANCE in the 6 components of apologies?

A

Promise not to repeat offence

50
Q

what is PROPOSE A REMEDY in the 6 components of apologies?

A

Offer to take action that reduces damage and repairs trust

51
Q

what is REQUEST FORGIVENESS in the 6 components of apologies?

A

Ask to be pardoned for actions

52
Q

how did Lewicki et al develop the 6 components of apologies?

A

experimentally manipulated apologies to contain different numbers and combinations of components
obtained measures of effectiveness (how adequate/credible)

53
Q

Which components in the 6 components of apologies were seen as more effective?

A

Additive effect: apologies containing more components were more effective

Importance hierarchy: components varied in their associations with apology effectiveness
Most important: Accept Responsibility, Explanation, Propose a remedy
Least important: Request forgiveness

54
Q

third party interventions

A

Involvement of a neutral outside party in conflict. IT is often necessary if parties are hostile. Third parties can help with the process, or in making decisions

55
Q

Mediation

A

facilitate interaction

high control over process and low control over the decision

56
Q

inquisition

A

conduct investigation and decide on resolution

high control over the process and high control over the decision

57
Q

arbitration

A

follow rules/ procedures and decide on resolution

low control over the process high control over the decision

58
Q

what is the order of preference for third party intervention methods?

A
Mediation = most preferred
Arbitration = okay 
inquisition = worse
59
Q

why is mediation the best preference of third party interventions?

A

Parties retain “voice” and control over issues
Parties “own” and contribute to resolution
Mediator presence can reduce antisocial behavior

60
Q

why is arbitration an okay preference for third party interventions?

A

Parties lose control over issues and resolution

Following rules/procedures adds to procedural fairness

61
Q

why is inquisition the worst preference for third party interventions?

A

Inquisitors may search for limited/biased information
Parties may feel they are not fairly heard
Parties feel they have little control