5.4 Human rights in the UK Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define Bill of Rights

A

Document that sets out civil rights for its citizens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Constitution

A

sets out fundamental principles by which the state is governed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In what way does the UK represent it’s citizens humans rights prior to the Human Rights Act 1998

A

They have a Bill of Rights, but it wasn’t a full Bill of Rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Due to UK not having a constitution or a full Bill of Rights, where were other freedoms found

A

Statute Law
Common Law
EU Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Statute law:

How can statute law form freedoms for its citizens?

A

It naturally creates freedoms as parliament passes law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Statute law:

Example of statute law and how it creates rights and freedoms

A

Magna carta 1215 - Guaranteed a right to appeal against unlawful imprisonment through a document called writ of habeas corpus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Statute law:

Why was the passing of the Magna Carta significant?

A

First document that put into writting the principle that the king and the government were not above the law, and that everyone is subject to the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common law:

What is common law

A

Laws that have been soread through customs and have been adopted and developed as a norm around the UK. Ratified by judges in legal cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Common Law:

Define Ratified

A

give formal consent to, making it officially valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Example of Common Law in human rights

A

Bushell’s Case (1670)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Common law:

Facts of Bushell’s case (1670)

A

judge ordered a jury to be detained in a room without food until they came to a decision the judge wanted. The case decided it went against the principle of a fair trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

EU law:

what are some ways the UK has benefitted from its close association with european countries in terms of human rights laws

A
  • Adopted many freedoms, such as in employment law.
  • European Convention on human rights fully incorporated into domestic law by the Human Rights Act 1998
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

EU law:

Example of employment law that has been adopted into UK law

A

Directives under Article 141 of Treaty of Rome banned discrimination on the basis of gender, sexual orientation, age and race

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998:

What was the main purpose of the Human RIghts Act 1998

A

To give further effect to rights and freedoms gueranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998:

What articles of the original Convention were incorporated into the Act?

A

Articles 1 and 3 of first protocol

Articles 2 - 12 and 14

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998:

WHat does section 6 state about the role of public authority in accourdance to the Human RIghts Act 1998

A

Its unlawful for them to act in a way that is incompatible with what is in the Articles in the Convention

17
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998:

What does the term public authority cover

A

Organisations and those in public sectors, like the police

  • not government figures
18
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998:

How does section 7 outline what a person can do in order to bring a claim against a public authority

A

a) bring proceedings against the authority under this act in appropriate court or tribunal

(b) rely on the Convention right or rights concerned in any legal proceedings.’

19
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998:

When a court or tribunal is determening a question that has risen in connection with a convention right, what must it take into account?

A

Any judgement, decision, declaration or advisory opinion of the European Court of Human Rights.

  • even if there’s conflicting interest by UK court
20
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act (1998)

Section 19, what is meant by ‘statement compatibility’

A

Before Second Reading of a Bill, Minister of the Crown in charge of the Bill must make a statement about his views on how the Bill is compatible with Convention Rights

21
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act (1998)

Section 19, if a minister makes a declaration of incompatibility, can the Bill still proceed?

A

Yes

22
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act (1998)

What does section 3 state about primary and subordinate legislation.

A

so far as is possible to do so, they must be read and given effect in a way which is compatible with the convention right

23
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act (1998)

What is primary legislation

A

acts passed by parliament

24
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act (1998)

What is subordinate legislation

A

law which is enacted under delegated powers

25
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act (1998)

Case that shows english courts giving precedence to the Convention even before 1998 act was passed.

A

R v DPP ex parte Kebiline (1999)

26
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act (1998)

facts of R v DPP ex parte Kebiline 1999

A

The 3 D were arrested in 1997 by officers of the anti-terrorist squad under section 16A of the Prevention of Terrorism act.

27
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act (1998)

Held in R DPP ex parte Kelibene

A

trial judge stated that s16A of the Prevention of Terrorism act was conflciting with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

  • House of lord also agreed with the trial judge.
28
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act (1998)

Section 10, what would court have to do if they are satisfied that there is incompatability of a Convention right

A

Make a declaration of incompatibility

29
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act (1998)

how would the courts deal with incompatability.

A

statutory instrument can be used to amend the act in question to comply with the convention

30
Q

After the enactment of the Human Rights Act (1998)

What are some critisms on the Human Rights Act 1998?

A

Act removes sovereignty of the Supreme court to the European Court of Human RIghts, this allows non UK judges to decide domestic UK law

If found incompatible, the UK government is not forced to amend these laws to make them compatible with the Convention

The Act relies on individuals to bring an action of incompatibility. There’s no committee which monitors an Act’s adherence to the Convention.